NCLAT: Can’t Dismiss Restoration App. if Filed in 30 Days from Date of Dismissal of Original App.  ||  Delhi HC: Communication between Parties through Whatsapp Constitute Valid Agreement  ||  Delhi HC Seeks Response from Govt. Over Penalties on Petrol Pumps Supplying Fuel to Old Vehicles  ||  Centre Notifies "Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Rules, 2025"  ||  Del. HC: Can’t Reject TM Owner’s Claim Merely because Defendant Could have Sought Removal of Mark  ||  Bombay HC: Cannot Treat Sole Director of OPC, Parallelly with Separate Legal Entity  ||  Delhi HC: Can Apply 'Family of Marks' Concept to Injunct Specific Marks  ||  HP HC: Can’t Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree for Mere Irregularity  ||  Cal. HC: Order by HC Bench Not Conferred With Determination by Roster is Void  ||  Calcutta HC: Purchase Order Including Arbitration Agreement to Prevail Over Tax Invoice Lacking it    

Interglobe Aviation Ltd. and ors. v. Competition Commission of India and ors. - (Competition Appellate Tribunal) (09 Feb 2016)

CCI order against airlines’ cartelisation stayed

MRTP/ Competition Laws

The Competition Appellate Tribunal stayed an order of the Competition Commission of India against various airlines for having cartelised in the freight market. Though the Tribunal did not specify reasons, it seemed amenable to Appellants’ arguments of violation of principles of natural justice, claiming having not been sent a show cause notice by the Commission. Other arguments on behalf of Interglobe Aviation Ltd. (Indigo) and Spicejet Limited sought to distance them from the cartel and questioned the quantum of fine imposed.

Relevant : Express Industry Council of India v. Jet Airways (India) Ltd. and Ors. MANU/CO/0099/2015

Tags : COMPAT   AIRLINES   FREIGHT   CARTEL   FINE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved