SC: Confirmation of an Auction Sale Does Not Bar Judicial Scrutiny of Reserve Price Valuation  ||  Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction of Four Men in a 1998 Gang Rape Case  ||  Supreme Court: Privy Purse Privileges of Princely Rulers are Not Enforceable Legal Rights  ||  Delhi HC: Repeated Court Summons May Distress and Re-Traumatize Child Sexual Assault Victims  ||  Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Labeling Someone as a Terrorist Associate Amounts to Defamation  ||  Delhi HC: Setting Aside or Altering a Judge’s Order by a Higher Court Doesn’t Affect Their Integrity  ||  Delhi High Court: Accused Cannot be Faulted For Smart Replies; Interrogator Must be Sharper  ||  Supreme Court: Belated Jurisdictional Challenge Impermissible After Participation in Arbitration  ||  Supreme Court: Failure to Prove Specific Overt Acts of Each Unlawful Assembly Member Not Fatal  ||  Supreme Court: Parental Salary Alone Cannot Determine OBC Creamy Layer Status    

Interglobe Aviation Ltd. and ors. v. Competition Commission of India and ors. - (Competition Appellate Tribunal) (09 Feb 2016)

CCI order against airlines’ cartelisation stayed

MRTP/ Competition Laws

The Competition Appellate Tribunal stayed an order of the Competition Commission of India against various airlines for having cartelised in the freight market. Though the Tribunal did not specify reasons, it seemed amenable to Appellants’ arguments of violation of principles of natural justice, claiming having not been sent a show cause notice by the Commission. Other arguments on behalf of Interglobe Aviation Ltd. (Indigo) and Spicejet Limited sought to distance them from the cartel and questioned the quantum of fine imposed.

Relevant : Express Industry Council of India v. Jet Airways (India) Ltd. and Ors. MANU/CO/0099/2015

Tags : COMPAT   AIRLINES   FREIGHT   CARTEL   FINE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved