NCLAT: Can’t Set Aside Liquidation Order u/s 33 IBC When 3rd Party has Taken Possession of Property  ||  NCLAT: Unless Amendment Application Filed, Authority Can’t Suo Motu Amend Date of Default  ||  Delhi HC Directs Removal of 'Kindpan' Trademark in Petition Filed by ‘Mankind’  ||  J&K HC: Limitation for Challenging Award Starts after Signed Copy is Received by Party  ||  Delhi HC: ‘High Speed’ Not Sufficient to Conclude Driver Acted in Rash and Negligent Manner  ||  Allahabad HC: Huge Difference between Executing a Particular Document and Being a Witness  ||  Kerala HC: Can’t Consider Co-Opted Members of Bar Council as Separate Class from Elected Members  ||  J&K HC: Govt. Failing to Communicate Rejection of Detenue’s Representation in Time Vitiates Order  ||  SC: Electricity Act Empowers State Commissions to Regulate Open Access Within their Respective States  ||  SC: Limitation Begins from Date of Registration of Sale Deed that Constitutes Constructive Notice    

Interglobe Aviation Ltd. and ors. v. Competition Commission of India and ors. - (Competition Appellate Tribunal) (09 Feb 2016)

CCI order against airlines’ cartelisation stayed

MRTP/ Competition Laws

The Competition Appellate Tribunal stayed an order of the Competition Commission of India against various airlines for having cartelised in the freight market. Though the Tribunal did not specify reasons, it seemed amenable to Appellants’ arguments of violation of principles of natural justice, claiming having not been sent a show cause notice by the Commission. Other arguments on behalf of Interglobe Aviation Ltd. (Indigo) and Spicejet Limited sought to distance them from the cartel and questioned the quantum of fine imposed.

Relevant : Express Industry Council of India v. Jet Airways (India) Ltd. and Ors. MANU/CO/0099/2015

Tags : COMPAT   AIRLINES   FREIGHT   CARTEL   FINE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved