Karnataka HC: A Neighbour Cannot be Charged With Matrimonial Cruelty under Section 498A IPC  ||  Revisional Power U/S 25B(8) of Delhi Rent Control Act is Supervisory; HC Cannot Revisit Facts  ||  Poverty Cannot Bar Parole; Rajasthan HC Waives Surety For Indigent Life Convict, Sets Guidelines  ||  Delhi High Court: Late Payment of TDS Does Not Absolve Criminal Liability under the Income Tax Act  ||  NCLT Kochi: Avoidance Provisions under Insolvency Code Aim to Restore, Not Punish, Parties  ||  Bombay High Court: In IBC Cases, High Courts Lack Parallel Contempt Jurisdiction over the NCLT  ||  Supreme Court: Concluded Auction Cannot Be Cancelled Merely To Invite Higher Bids at a Later Stage  ||  SC: In Customs Classification, Statutory Tariff Headings and HSN Notes Prevail over Common Parlance  ||  SC: Under the Urban Land Ceiling Act, Notice U/S 10(5) Must be Served on the Person in Possession  ||  Supreme Court: Only Courts May Condone Delay; Tribunals Lack Power Unless Statute Allows    

Interglobe Aviation Ltd. and ors. v. Competition Commission of India and ors. - (Competition Appellate Tribunal) (09 Feb 2016)

CCI order against airlines’ cartelisation stayed

MRTP/ Competition Laws

The Competition Appellate Tribunal stayed an order of the Competition Commission of India against various airlines for having cartelised in the freight market. Though the Tribunal did not specify reasons, it seemed amenable to Appellants’ arguments of violation of principles of natural justice, claiming having not been sent a show cause notice by the Commission. Other arguments on behalf of Interglobe Aviation Ltd. (Indigo) and Spicejet Limited sought to distance them from the cartel and questioned the quantum of fine imposed.

Relevant : Express Industry Council of India v. Jet Airways (India) Ltd. and Ors. MANU/CO/0099/2015

Tags : COMPAT   AIRLINES   FREIGHT   CARTEL   FINE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved