P&H HC: Eyewitness Account Not Credible if Eyewitness Directly Identifies Accused in Court  ||  Delhi HC: Conditions u/s 45 PMLA Have to Give Way to Article 21 When Accused Incarcerated for Long  ||  Delhi High Court: Delhi Police to Add Grounds of Arrest in Arrest Memo  ||  Kerala High Court: Giving Seniority on the Basis of Rules is a Policy Decision  ||  Del. HC: Where Arbitrator has Taken Plausible View, Court Cannot Interfere u/s 34 of A&C Act  ||  Ker. HC: No Question of Estoppel Against Party Where Error is Committed by Court Itself  ||  Supreme Court: Revenue Entries are Admissible as Evidence of Possession  ||  SC: Mere Breakup of Relationship Between Consenting Couple Can’t Result in Criminal Proceedings  ||  SC: Bar u/s 195 CrPC Not Attracted Where Proceedings Initiated Pursuant to Judicial Order  ||  NTF Gives Comprehensive Suggestions on Enhancing Better Working Conditions of Medical Professions    

Interglobe Aviation Ltd. and ors. v. Competition Commission of India and ors. - (Competition Appellate Tribunal) (09 Feb 2016)

CCI order against airlines’ cartelisation stayed

MRTP/ Competition Laws

The Competition Appellate Tribunal stayed an order of the Competition Commission of India against various airlines for having cartelised in the freight market. Though the Tribunal did not specify reasons, it seemed amenable to Appellants’ arguments of violation of principles of natural justice, claiming having not been sent a show cause notice by the Commission. Other arguments on behalf of Interglobe Aviation Ltd. (Indigo) and Spicejet Limited sought to distance them from the cartel and questioned the quantum of fine imposed.

Relevant : Express Industry Council of India v. Jet Airways (India) Ltd. and Ors. MANU/CO/0099/2015

Tags : COMPAT   AIRLINES   FREIGHT   CARTEL   FINE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved