Karnataka High Court: Judicial Powers Cannot be Exercised by Conciliators in Lok Adalats  ||  Mad. HC: Registering Authorities Not Empowered to Cancel Sale Deed Through Summary Proceedings  ||  Telangana High Court: Section 18 UAPA is Penal in Nature, Needs to be Proved by Prosecution  ||  Karnataka High Court: Rights of Adopted Child of Indian Parents Cannot be Left Marooned  ||  All. HC: No Authority to Additional Chief Medical Officer to File Complaint Under PCPNDT Act  ||  Kar. HC: Cannot Prosecute Second Spouse or Their Family for Bigamy Under Section 494 IPC  ||  Calcutta High Court: Person Seeking to Contest Elections is Deemed Public Interest  ||  Mad HC: In Absence of Prohibitory Order u/s 144 CrPC People Assembling and Demonstrating Not Offence  ||  Bom. HC: Legal Action to be Taken Against Doctor for Gross Negligence in Conducting Postmortem  ||  Bom. HC: Husband Directed to Pay Wife Compensation of Rs. 3 Crore for DV & Calling Her ‘Second-Hand’    

Madras HC Directs Satellite Imaging of Taluks and Earmarking of Waterbodies - (19 Apr 2021)

FAMILY

Chhattisgarh High Court has observed that existence of a serious dispute between a husband and wife is not a prerequisite for grant of divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The Court also opined that a judicial separation, instead of divorce by mutual consent cannot be granted in a mechanical manner.

Tags : CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT   GRANT OF DIVORCE BY MUTUAL CONSENT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved