P&H HC: Eyewitness Account Not Credible if Eyewitness Directly Identifies Accused in Court  ||  Delhi HC: Conditions u/s 45 PMLA Have to Give Way to Article 21 When Accused Incarcerated for Long  ||  Delhi High Court: Delhi Police to Add Grounds of Arrest in Arrest Memo  ||  Kerala High Court: Giving Seniority on the Basis of Rules is a Policy Decision  ||  Del. HC: Where Arbitrator has Taken Plausible View, Court Cannot Interfere u/s 34 of A&C Act  ||  Ker. HC: No Question of Estoppel Against Party Where Error is Committed by Court Itself  ||  Supreme Court: Revenue Entries are Admissible as Evidence of Possession  ||  SC: Mere Breakup of Relationship Between Consenting Couple Can’t Result in Criminal Proceedings  ||  SC: Bar u/s 195 CrPC Not Attracted Where Proceedings Initiated Pursuant to Judicial Order  ||  NTF Gives Comprehensive Suggestions on Enhancing Better Working Conditions of Medical Professions    

R.Narayanan Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (05 Feb 2021)

Despite the stipulation of absolute performance casted upon the licensee, lockdown shall be treated as a force majeure event for performance of obligation under the contract.

MANU/TN/0330/2021

Contract

Petitioner a successful bidder and licensee of one of the shops of the respondent had paid one year advance license fee to the respondent. Following the outbreak of COVID-19, the petitioner has suffered considerable financial loss due to which the petitioner did not get his license renewed even though there was a clause providing for it. The petitioner filed a petition demanding waiver of the license fee for the lockdown period and partial waiver of subsequent period.

The issue in the instant case was whether notwithstanding the stipulation of absolute performance casted upon the licensee, this court would be justified in treating the lockdown as a force majeure event which will relieve the licensee from performing his obligations to the corresponding event.

The court observed that although the license agreement between the petitioner and the respondents did not have an express ‘force majeure’ clause, the COVID-19 pandemic has to be treated as a force majeure event. Since, the local body itself directed the shutting down of the bus stand and the shops, it cannot demand license fee during the period when the shop remained close.

The court criticized the order on the recommendation of Commissioner of Municipal Administration to grant two months waiver of license fee on account of lockdown as it would have been made without considering the fact that the lockdown was further extended.Hence, the court while allowing the writ petition directed the complete waiver of license fee from March 24 to September 6, 2020.

Tags : FORCE MAJEURE   LOCKDOWN  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved