Bombay HC: Wife Humiliating Husband in Front of His Friends is Amounts to Cruelty || Delhi HC Interprets Doctrine of “Compelled Self-Publication”, || Del. HC Issues Summons to Campus Sutra in Trademark Infringement Suit Filed by Footwear Brand Campus || Bombay HC Dismisses PIL Seeking Restraining Order against PRADA || Delhi HC: Cannot Bypass Bar on Revision of Interlocutory Order by Invoking Inherent Jurisdiction || Delhi HC: Prosecutrix’s Refusal to Undergo Medical Examination Weakens the Case || Bom. HC: No Provision under JJ Act that Allows Adoption of a Child of Foreign Citizenship || SC Passes Order to Prevent Russian Mother’s Attempt to Flee with Child || SC: Deprivation of Natural Heir from Will May Not Raise Suspicion || SC: Denying Female Heir Right in Property Only Exacerbates Gender Division

SC: Section 43D (5) UAPA Act Does Not Oust Ability of Constitutional Courts to Grant Bail - (02 Feb 2021)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has held that Section 43D (5) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA Act) per¬ se does not oust the ability of Constitutional Courts to grant bail on ground of violation of Fundamental Right to Speedy Trial. The Court has also observed that the rigours of the provision will melt down where there is no likelihood of trial being completed within a reasonable time and the period of incarceration already undergone has exceeded a substantial part of the prescribed sentence.

Tags : SUPREME COURT ABILITY OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO GRANT BAIL

Share :