NCLAT: Can Seek Eviction of Tenant from Corporate Debtor's Property under Tenancy Law || NCLAT: For Calculating Limitation Period, Period from 15.3.2020 to 28.2.2022 shall stand excluded || NCLAT: Adjudicating Authority Can’t Decide Workers' Claims for Layoff Period Dues under ID Act || NCLAT: While Dismissing Appeal for Non-Prosecu., Adj. Authority Can’t Direct Dismissal on Merits Too || NCLAT: Claims Subsequent to Cut-off Date to be Dealt as Per RP by Adjudicating Authority || NCLAT Upholds Canara Bank’s Claims for Loans Advanced to CD on behalf of Homebuyers || Allahabad HC Stays Criminal Proceedings on Ground of Inordinate Delay Caused by State || Ker. HC Declares Rule 12(9) of the Kerala Paddy Land and Wetland Rules as Ultra Vires || Del. HC: Support to Terrorist Organisation through Money or Networking is Prohibited under UAPA || HP HC: Mentioning of Wong Provision Not Fatal to Application

SC Seeks WhatsApp, Facebook Response on Plea Seeking Data Protection on UPI Platforms - (02 Feb 2021)

MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION

Supreme Court has held that Section 43¬D (5) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA Act) per¬ se does not oust the ability of Constitutional Courts to grant bail on ground of violation of Fundamental Right to Speedy Trial. The Court has also observed that the rigours of the provision will melt down where there is no likelihood of trial being completed within a reasonable time and the period of incarceration already undergone has exceeded a substantial part of the prescribed sentence

Tags : SUPREME COURT ABILITY OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO GRANT BAIL

Share :