Supreme Court Expresses Disappointment Over Inadequate Implementation of RPwD Act, 2016 || 24,000 Teaching and Non-Teaching Jobs Invalidated by Calcutta High Court || 24,000 Teaching and Non-Teaching Jobs Invalidated by Calcutta High Court || Del. HC: For Purposes of Article 19(6) of COI National Council for Teacher Education is ‘State’ || Karnataka High Court: Smoking Hookah as Addictive and Harmful as Smoking Cigarettes || All. HC: Interest Can’t be Awarded by Labour Court In Proc. for Money Recovery from Empl. u/s 33C(2) || All. HC: Rs. 5 Lakh Cost Imposed on CWC for Sending Minor Living With Mother to Children’s Home || Ker. HC Issues Guidelines for DNA Testing of Children of Rape Victims Who Are Given in Adoption || SC: Fourteen-Year-Old Rape Survivor Allowed to Terminate Twenty-Eight-Week Pregnancy || SC: Government of Himachal Pradesh Directed to Review its Policies on Child Care Leaves

SC Seeks WhatsApp, Facebook Response on Plea Seeking Data Protection on UPI Platforms - (02 Feb 2021)

MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION

Supreme Court has held that Section 43¬D (5) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA Act) per¬ se does not oust the ability of Constitutional Courts to grant bail on ground of violation of Fundamental Right to Speedy Trial. The Court has also observed that the rigours of the provision will melt down where there is no likelihood of trial being completed within a reasonable time and the period of incarceration already undergone has exceeded a substantial part of the prescribed sentence

Tags : SUPREME COURT ABILITY OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO GRANT BAIL

Share :