CCPA Fines Chaayos Rs.50,000 for Default Inclusion of Service Charge in Bills || MP HC: Major Unmarried Daughter Need Not Prove Disability to Claim Maintenance if Unable to Earn || Madras HC: Travel Costs Must be Reimbursed to Independent Special Public Prosecutors || MP HC: Timely Coordination Between Police, Banks and Telecom Bodies is Crucial in Cyber Fraud || Kerala HC: Foreign Counsel Cannot Conduct Cross-Examination Before Commissioners || Allahabad HC: Proclaimed Offenders Get Anticipatory Bail Only in Rare and Exceptional Cases || Madras HC: Repeated Intimacy Alone Doesn't Prove Consent; Coercion & Deception Must be Examined || SC: Government Can Revise Royalty under the MMDR Act Despite a Silent Lease Deed || SC: Recovery of a Weapon Alone is Insufficient to Prove Guilt Without Conscious Possession || SC: Section 68 of Evidence Act Does Not Require Attesting Witnesses to Prove Registered Sale Deeds

SC Seeks WhatsApp, Facebook Response on Plea Seeking Data Protection on UPI Platforms - (02 Feb 2021)

MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION

Supreme Court has held that Section 43¬D (5) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA Act) per¬ se does not oust the ability of Constitutional Courts to grant bail on ground of violation of Fundamental Right to Speedy Trial. The Court has also observed that the rigours of the provision will melt down where there is no likelihood of trial being completed within a reasonable time and the period of incarceration already undergone has exceeded a substantial part of the prescribed sentence

Tags : SUPREME COURT ABILITY OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO GRANT BAIL

Share :