Bombay High Court: ‘GIRNAR’ a Well Known Trademark in India || Kerala HC: Criminal Courts of District Judiciary Cannot Recall their Earlier Orders || Madras HC: Only ‘Preponderance of Probability’ Required in Disciplinary Proceedings || Raj HC: Non-Disclosure of Information Wasn’t a Ground for Disqualification Before 2015 Amendment Act || Bom. HC: Workers in Statutory Canteens are Principal Employer’s Employees || Supreme Court: NCLAT Cannot Use its ‘Inherent Powers’ to Subvert Legal Provisions || Supreme Court: NCLAT Cannot Use its ‘Inherent Powers’ to Subvert Legal Provisions || SC Refuses to Mark Presence of Advocate Who Did Not Argue the Matter || SC Sets Aside HC’s Decision to Accept Aadhaar Card as a Proof of Date of Birth || SC Permits Candidate with Blindness to Attend Interview for Selection of Civil Judges in Rajasthan

SC Seeks WhatsApp, Facebook Response on Plea Seeking Data Protection on UPI Platforms - (02 Feb 2021)

MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION

Supreme Court has held that Section 43¬D (5) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA Act) per¬ se does not oust the ability of Constitutional Courts to grant bail on ground of violation of Fundamental Right to Speedy Trial. The Court has also observed that the rigours of the provision will melt down where there is no likelihood of trial being completed within a reasonable time and the period of incarceration already undergone has exceeded a substantial part of the prescribed sentence

Tags : SUPREME COURT ABILITY OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO GRANT BAIL

Share :