Kerala HC Imposes Rs. 1 Lakh Cost for Filing Two Appeals Leading to Conflicting Verdicts || Gujarat HC: Giving Probe Papers to Complainant Before Chargesheet is filed Is 'Prima Facie Dangerous' || SC Quashes Army’s Gender-Biased JAG Policy as ‘Against Equality’ || SC to Jharkhand HC Judges: Take Leave to Clear Pending Judgments || SC Stays NGT’s Rs. 50 Cr Fine on DJB & MCD Over Yamuna Pollution || SC: Bar Councils Can't Collect "Optional Fees" During Enrolment || Calcutta HC: In Framing Arbitration Agreement Words Used Must be Certain, Definite || J&K HC: Can’t Evaluate Performance of Employee When on Sanctioned Leave During Covid || Kerala HC: Public Paying Toll Fees Casts Responsibility on NHAI to Ensure Smooth Traffic || Calc. HC: Writ Court Rejecting Claims Over Disputed Issues Doesn’t Bar Arbitration if Clause Exists

SC Seeks WhatsApp, Facebook Response on Plea Seeking Data Protection on UPI Platforms - (02 Feb 2021)

MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION

Supreme Court has held that Section 43¬D (5) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA Act) per¬ se does not oust the ability of Constitutional Courts to grant bail on ground of violation of Fundamental Right to Speedy Trial. The Court has also observed that the rigours of the provision will melt down where there is no likelihood of trial being completed within a reasonable time and the period of incarceration already undergone has exceeded a substantial part of the prescribed sentence

Tags : SUPREME COURT ABILITY OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO GRANT BAIL

Share :