Apparel Manufacturer Moves NCLT against Zomato Over Non-Payment of Dues  ||  Supreme Court: All the Sports Associations are Ailing Bodies  ||  Delhi HC Restrains Restaurants from Using Marks ‘Dominic Pizza’ ‘Domindo Pizza’  ||  J&K HC: Mere Filing of WS doesn’t Constitute Waiver of Right to Arbitration  ||  Karnataka HC: Today in the Form of Reels, Unlawful Activities are Glorified  ||  J&K HC Quashes Preventive Detention of former J&K High Court Bar Association President  ||  Supreme Court Sets Aside Bar by NGT on Auroville Township Project  ||  Supreme Court Extends Tenure of Justice Gita Mittal Committee  ||  BCI Issues Warning against Practice of Advocates Advertising their Legal Services  ||  SC: Act of Money Laundering Extends so Long as the Proceeds of Crime are Concealed    

Stantech Project Engg. Pvt. Ltd. v. Nicco Corporation Ltd. - (Supreme Court) (13 Aug 2015)

High Court "unjustifiably considerate" in setting aside order passed on mistaken concession by junior counsel

MANU/SC/0858/2015

Company

The Supreme Court differed with the finding of the High Court that a concession by a junior counsel before a Company Court was mistaken. It held that by recording the debt owed by the Respondent would be paid in installments, the counsel had 'displayed legal sagacity' in preventing the winding up of the Respondent. The Supreme Court rebuked the the High Court's "leniency that results in proliferation and prolongation of litigation".

Relevant : Shrimati Jamilabai Abdul Kadar v. Shankarlal Gulabchand MANU/SC/0518/1975 State of Maharashtra v. Ramdas Shrinivas Nayak MANU/SC/0117/1982

Tags : COUNSEL   MISTAKE   WINDING UP   CONCESSION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved