SC: SARFAESI Act Was Not Applicable in Nagaland Before its 2021 Adoption, Dismisses Creditor’s Plea || SC: Lis Pendens Applies To Money Suits on Mortgaged Property, Including Ex Parte Proceedings || Kerala HC: Civil Courts Cannot Grant Injunctions in NCLT Matters and Such Orders Can Be Set Aside || Bombay High Court: Technical Breaks to Temporary Employees Cannot Deny Maternity Leave Benefits || NCLAT: Appellate Jurisdiction Limited to Orders Deciding Parties’ Rights, Not Procedural Directions || NCLAT: Personal Guarantors Involved In NCLT Proceedings Can Appeal Against Insolvency Admission || Supreme Court: Foreign Companies’ Head Office Expenses in India are Capped under Section 44C || SC Directs Trial Courts to Systematically Catalogue Witnesses and Evidence in Criminal Judgments || SC Calls For Sensitising Future Generations on Equality in Marriage to Combat Dowry Practices || SC: Separate Suits Against Confirmed Auction Sales are Barred; Remedy Available under Sec 47

Stantech Project Engg. Pvt. Ltd. v. Nicco Corporation Ltd. - (Supreme Court) (13 Aug 2015)

High Court "unjustifiably considerate" in setting aside order passed on mistaken concession by junior counsel

MANU/SC/0858/2015

Company

The Supreme Court differed with the finding of the High Court that a concession by a junior counsel before a Company Court was mistaken. It held that by recording the debt owed by the Respondent would be paid in installments, the counsel had 'displayed legal sagacity' in preventing the winding up of the Respondent. The Supreme Court rebuked the the High Court's "leniency that results in proliferation and prolongation of litigation".

Relevant : Shrimati Jamilabai Abdul Kadar v. Shankarlal Gulabchand MANU/SC/0518/1975 State of Maharashtra v. Ramdas Shrinivas Nayak MANU/SC/0117/1982

Tags : COUNSEL MISTAKE WINDING UP CONCESSION

Share :