Madhya Pradesh High Court: Victims Must be Given a Hearing Even Before Closure Report Rejection  ||  Delhi HC: Payment of ‘Pagri’ Does Not Render Tenancy Non-Terminable, Allowing Eviction  ||  Ker HC Examined Whether Electro-Homeopathy Can be Practised Without Registration under Medical Laws  ||  Delhi HC: Better Possessory Title Holder Can Recover Property From Occupant Without Superior Right  ||  Bombay High Court: Compensatory Afforestation Must Be in Same or Nearby Locality For Residents  ||  Bombay High Court Protects ‘MEFTAL-SPAS’, Restrains Use of Similar Drug Brand  ||  Supreme Court: Inclusion in Revised Select List Does Not Give TN MV Inspectors a Vested Right  ||  Bombay HC: ICC Cannot Hear Sexual Harassment Complaint over Non-Employer Transport Incident  ||  Ker HC Upholds Rule that Homeopathic Doctors Must Cancel Registration Before Enrolment as Advocates  ||  J&K&L HC: Evidence Negating Penetration Warrants Conviction For Attempt to Rape, Not Rape    

Reserve Bank of India imposes monetary penalty on Central Bank of India- (Reserve Bank of India) (10 Nov 2020)

MANU/RPRL/0165/2020

Banking

Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has, by an order dated November 10, 2020, imposed a monetary penalty of Rs. 50 lakh (Rupees Fifty lakh only) on Central Bank of India (the bank) for non-compliance with certain provisions of directions issued by RBI contained in the circular on "Housing Sector- Innovative Housing Loan Products - Upfront disbursal of housing loans" dated September 3, 2013.

The penalty has been imposed in exercise of powers vested in RBI under the provisions of Section 47A(1)(c) read with Section 46(4)(i) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. This action is based on the deficiencies in regulatory compliance and is not intended to pronounce upon the validity of any transaction or agreement entered into by the bank with its customers.

Background

An off-site examination of the records pertaining to some housing loans disbursed by the bank was conducted by RBI. The examination and related documents revealed non-compliance with the abovementioned directions issued by RBI. In furtherance to the same, a notice was issued to the bank advising it to show cause as to why penalty should not be imposed on it for non-compliance with the directions. After considering the bank's reply to the notice, oral submissions made in the personal hearings and examination of additional submissions, RBI concluded that the charges of non-compliance with the aforesaid directions were substantiated and warranted imposition of monetary penalty.

Tags : PENALTY   IMPOSITION   CENTRAL BANK  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved