Bombay HC: Railway Employee With Valid Privilege Pass is Bona Fide Passenger Despite Missing Entries || Delhi High Court: Mere Pleadings Made To Prosecute or Defend a Case Do Not Amount To Defamation || Delhi High Court: Asking an Accused To Cross-Examine a Witness Without Legal Aid Vitiates The Trial || Delhi High Court: Recruitment Notice Error Creates No Appointment Right Without Vacancy || Supreme Court: Subordinate Legislation Takes Effect Only From its Publication in The Official Gazette || Supreme Court: DDA Must Adopt a Litigation Policy To Screen Cases and Avoid Unnecessary Filings || Authorities Holding Public Auctions Must Disclose All Known Encumbrances and Related Litigation || SC: Compensatory Allowances Must Be Included While Computing Overtime Wages U/S 59 of Factories Act || SC: NGT Has No Jurisdiction to Decide Disputes Relating to Building Plan Violations || SC: Evidence is Often Fabricated Using AI And False Allegations are Rampant in Matrimonial Cases

TRAI questions Facebook about soliciting Differential Pricing feedback- (Telecom Regulatory Authority of India) (12 Jan 2016)

MANU/TRAI/0006/2016

Media and Communication

Pursuant to its Consultation Paper on ‘Differential Pricing for Data Services' released on 9.12.2015, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India received 24 lakh responses from stakeholders. Of these, 5.44 lakh responses were received through email with the domain name 'facebookmail.com'; approximately 13.5 lakh responses were sent through '@support free basics.in', where only a mobile number of the sender was mentioned. Various queries were raised with Facebook regarding its use if influence to propositioning the responses. Correspondence between TRAI and Facebook is contained in the notification.

Tags : DIFFERENTIAL PRICING CONSULTATION FACEBOOK SOLICIT

Share :