Patna HC: Disciplinary Authority Cannot Impose Major and Minor Penalties in a Single Order || Calcutta HC: Landlord Decides His Residential Needs; Courts Cannot Set Living Standards in Eviction || Orissa HC: Second Marriage During Subsistence of First Remains Invalid Even After First Wife's Death || Karnataka HC: Appeals Against Acquittal in Bailable Offences Lie Only Before High Court || Supreme Court: Stamp Duty on an Agreement to Sell is Leviable Only if Possession is Transferred || SC: Motive Becomes Irrelevant When Direct Evidence Such as a Dying Declaration is Available || Supreme Court Issues Directions to CoC in Builder Insolvency Cases To Protect Homebuyers’ Interests || MP High Court: Women Retain Reservation Benefits After Marriage if Caste is Recognized in Both States || Allahabad HC: Police Must Prosecute Informants of False Firs, and IOs May Face Contempt if They Fail || MP HP: Over-Age Candidate Cannot Claim Age Relaxation Due to Delay in Earlier Recruitment

TRAI questions Facebook about soliciting Differential Pricing feedback- (Telecom Regulatory Authority of India) (12 Jan 2016)

MANU/TRAI/0006/2016

Media and Communication

Pursuant to its Consultation Paper on ‘Differential Pricing for Data Services' released on 9.12.2015, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India received 24 lakh responses from stakeholders. Of these, 5.44 lakh responses were received through email with the domain name 'facebookmail.com'; approximately 13.5 lakh responses were sent through '@support free basics.in', where only a mobile number of the sender was mentioned. Various queries were raised with Facebook regarding its use if influence to propositioning the responses. Correspondence between TRAI and Facebook is contained in the notification.

Tags : DIFFERENTIAL PRICING CONSULTATION FACEBOOK SOLICIT

Share :