Bombay HC Conducts Emergency Hearing from CJ’s Residence as Court Staff Deployed for Elections || Madras HC: Preventive Detention Laws are Draconian, Cannot be Used to Curb Dissent or Settle Politics || HP HC: Mere Interest in a Project Cannot Justify Impleading a Non-Signatory in Arbitration || J&K&L HC: Women Accused in Non-Bailable Offences Form a Distinct Class Beyond Sec 437 CrPC Rigour || Bombay HC Restores IMAX’s Enforcement of Foreign Awards Against E-City, Applying Res Judicata || Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of Bail For Man Accused of Assault Causing Miscarriage || J&K&L High Court Invalidates Residence-Based Reservation, Citing Violation of Article 16 || Kerala HC Denies Parole to Life Convict in TP Chandrasekharan Murder Case For Cousin's Funeral || High Court Grants Bail to J&K Bank Manager in Multi-Crore Loan Fraud Case, Emphasizing Bail As Rule || J&K HC: Civil Remedy Alone Cannot Be Used To Quash Criminal Proceedings in Enso Tower Case

TRAI questions Facebook about soliciting Differential Pricing feedback- (Telecom Regulatory Authority of India) (12 Jan 2016)

MANU/TRAI/0006/2016

Media and Communication

Pursuant to its Consultation Paper on ‘Differential Pricing for Data Services' released on 9.12.2015, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India received 24 lakh responses from stakeholders. Of these, 5.44 lakh responses were received through email with the domain name 'facebookmail.com'; approximately 13.5 lakh responses were sent through '@support free basics.in', where only a mobile number of the sender was mentioned. Various queries were raised with Facebook regarding its use if influence to propositioning the responses. Correspondence between TRAI and Facebook is contained in the notification.

Tags : DIFFERENTIAL PRICING CONSULTATION FACEBOOK SOLICIT

Share :