Supreme Court: Non-Signatory That is Not a Veritable Party Cannot Invoke an Arbitration Clause || SC: Bail Can't be Cancelled For Police Non-Appearance Once Chargesheet is Filed and Trial is Attended || SC: New Arbitration Bill Fails To Provide a Statutory Appeal Against Tribunal Termination Orders || SC: Employees Who Resign or Retire After Five Years of Service Are Entitled to Receive Gratuity || SC: Employees Who Resign or Retire After Five Years of Service Are Entitled to Receive Gratuity || Supreme Court: Higher Courts Should Avoid Unnecessary Remand of Cases to Lower Courts || J&K&L HC: Under SARFAESI Act, Borrower's Right To Redeem a Secured Asset Ends With Auction Notice || Calcutta HC: Income Tax Returns Can Be Used to Assess Victim's Income; ?39 Lakh Compensation Granted || Delhi HC: Woman's Right to a Shared Household Does Not Allow Indefinite Occupation of In-Laws' Home || Delhi HC: Director Disputes in a Company Do Not Qualify as Genuine Hardship to Delay ITR Filing

TRAI questions Facebook about soliciting Differential Pricing feedback- (Telecom Regulatory Authority of India) (12 Jan 2016)

MANU/TRAI/0006/2016

Media and Communication

Pursuant to its Consultation Paper on ‘Differential Pricing for Data Services' released on 9.12.2015, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India received 24 lakh responses from stakeholders. Of these, 5.44 lakh responses were received through email with the domain name 'facebookmail.com'; approximately 13.5 lakh responses were sent through '@support free basics.in', where only a mobile number of the sender was mentioned. Various queries were raised with Facebook regarding its use if influence to propositioning the responses. Correspondence between TRAI and Facebook is contained in the notification.

Tags : DIFFERENTIAL PRICING CONSULTATION FACEBOOK SOLICIT

Share :