Calling the Situation Grim, the Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Delays in NCLT Approvals  ||  Supreme Court: Admission of a Claim by a Resolution Professional is Not Debt Acknowledgment  ||  Supreme Court: Public Figures Must Exercise Caution as Their Words Have Consequences in Society  ||  SC: State Must Act as a Model Employer, Criticising the Union For Not Regularising ISRO Workers  ||  J&K&L High Court: Minor Minerals Have Major Environmental Impacts and Must be Regulated  ||  Del HC: Unexplained Money Received by Public Servant is Not Bribery Without Proof of Official Favour  ||  Del HC: There is No Absolute Bar on Granting Co-Convicts Parole/Furlough Together in Suitable Cases  ||  Bom HC: LARR Authority Can Examine Limitation Issues in Land Acquisition References under 2013 Act  ||  MP HC: Long-Serving Employees Cannot Be Denied Regularisation by Retrospective Statutory Amendments  ||  J&K&L HC: Routine Challenges to Lok Adalat Awards Defeat Their Purpose of Quick Dispute Resolution    

Divya Creations vs. The ACIT - (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) (24 Jun 2020)

Assessee is not required to deduct tax at source on payments of foreign agency commission

MANU/ID/0501/2020

Direct Taxation

Present appeal by Assessee has been directed against the Order of the Learned CIT(A), for the Assessment year (AY) 2014-2015, challenging the addition of Rs.13,67,739. The AO on perusal of Schedule-18 of Selling Expenses noticed that, assessee had debited expenses in the name of commission to non-resident other than a company or a foreign company amounting to Rs.13,67,739. The AO noted that similar disallowance were made under Section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (IT Act) and considering the fact that the expenses made in foreign agency commission are of the same nature as last year and no TDS has been deducted by the assessee, therefore, the amount in question was disallowed under Section 40(a)(i) of the IT Act. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of assessee.

Learned Counsel for the Assessee, at the outset submitted that, in AY 2010-2011, similar issue was considered by ITAT, in the case of assessee and disallowance have been deleted. The Tribunal held that, “where assessee-firm made payments of commission to those agents, since those agents had their offices situated abroad and, moreover, services were also rendered by them outside India, assessee was not required to deduct tax at source while making payments in question.”

It is not in dispute that, the issue is same as have already been considered in earlier year by the Tribunal. The parties are also same. The Tribunal examined the issue in the light of agreement and material on record and found that, the agent had their base situated in Abroad and moreover services were also rendered by them outside. Therefore, assessee is not required to deduct tax at source while making payments in question. The AO in the assessment order has also made disallowance since in earlier year also of the same issue and no TDS have been deducted. Therefore, the facts being identical, no disallowance is required in the matter. Therefore, in view of the Order of the Tribunal in the case of assessee for the AY 2010-2011, the Orders of the authorities below is set aside and the addition are deleted. Appeal of Assessee allowed.

Tags : EXPENSES   FOREIGN AGENCY COMMISSION   ADDITION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved