Bombay HC: Judicial Remand Extension Beyond 60 Days Without Hearing, Reasons is Illegal  ||  Telangana HC: Changing Arbitration Venue Without Consent is Legally Perversive  ||  J&K&L HC: Properly Addressed and Sent Notice Deemed Served Under General Clauses Act  ||  Jharkhand HC: Fresh Anticipatory Bail Plea Not Maintainable After Earlier Rejection under S. 482 BNSS  ||  Orissa HC: Res Judicata Principle Doesn’t Apply to Execution Proceedings under Order 21 CPC  ||  Orissa HC: Railways Strictly Liable for Passenger’s Death After Falling From Train  ||  Del. HC: Director Not Individually Liable for Asset Transfer Without Consideration under S.276 IT Act  ||  Delhi HC: No Blanket Protection for Litigants from Counsel’s Negligence  ||  Bombay HC: Board under Mathadi Act Has No Power to Review its Own Orders  ||  Delhi HC: Father Granted Custody When Mother’s Adultery Allegation Includes Neglect    

Electronic Sealing-Deposit in and removal of goods from Customs Bonded Warehouses- (Ministry of Finance ) (18 May 2020)

MANU/CUCR/0024/2020

Customs

1. Circular-19/2018-Customs dated 18.06.2018 and Circular 10/2020-Customs dated 07.02.2020 provided for RFID sealing of goods to be deposited in or removed from Customs Bonded Warehouses. The implementation of these Circulars was deferred, vide Circulars No. 54/2018-Customs dated 31.12.2018 and 20/2020-Customs dated 21.04.2020.

2. In view of the representations received from stakeholders, Board has decided to review the modalities under the aforesaid circulars.

3. Accordingly, a comprehensive circular is under consideration and shall be soon placed in public domain (cbic.nic.in) to seek inputs/suggestions from all stakeholders before issuance.

4. In view of above, Circular-19/2018-Customs dated 18.06.2018 and Circular-10/2020-Customs dated 07.02.2020 issued previously in this matter and yet to be operationalized, stand rescinded.

Tags : REMOVAL   GOODS   BONDED WAREHOUSES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved