J&K&L High Court: Maternity Leave is a Constitutional Right and Cannot be Treated as State Charity  ||  P&H High Court: Second Anticipatory Bail Plea is Not Maintainable After Supreme Court Rejection  ||  Bombay High Court: No Prior Sanction is Required to Prosecute Police For Custodial Assault  ||  Allahabad High Court: Strict Proof of Marriage is Unnecessary if Couple Lived as Husband and Wife  ||  Delhi High Court: UP Passport Disputes Cannot be Filed in Delhi Only Because MEA is Based There  ||  Bombay High Court: Revenue Officers Cannot Decide Caste Status to Remove Tribal Land Protections  ||  Calcutta High Court: Punjab National Bank Liable to Compensate Farmers For Crop Insurance Lapse  ||  Calcutta High Court: Joint Settlement of Liquor Licence is Allowed if All Eligible Heirs Consent  ||  Delhi High Court Holds Multiple Sclerosis is a Specified Disability under the RPWD Act  ||  Allahabad High Court: An Alibi Must be Proved at Trial and Cannot be Accepted by the IO Alone    

Central Board of Direct Taxes amends the Income-tax Rules, 1962 for faster resolution of disputes in terms of tax treaties - (06 May 2020)

Direct Taxation

The Central Board of Direct Taxes amends the Income-tax Rules, 1962 aiming to speed-up dispute resolution and settle cases of multinational corporations (MNCs) that have opted for mutually agreeable procedure (MAP). The new amended rule brings in hope and certainty for faster resolution of disputes instead of chronic litigation process. The amendment will make it easier for Assessees, particularly MNCs operating in the country, to resolve their dispute with the tax department in a time-bound manner and as per the terms of tax treaties existing between the two Countries. These notified rules are termed as Income-tax (8th Amendment) Rules, 2020.

As per the amended Rule 44G, if an Assessee, being a resident of India, is aggrieved by any action of the tax authorities of any country or specified territory outside India may make an application to the Competent Authority of India seeking to invoke the mutual agreement procedure, if provided in such agreement, in Form No. 34F. The Competent Authority shall endeavour to arrive at a mutually agreeable resolution of the tax disputes, arising from such actions of the income-tax authorities, in accordance with the agreement between India and the other country or specified territory within an average time period of twenty-four months.

If a resolution is arrived at between the Competent Authority in India and that of the other country or specified territory, the same shall be communicated in writing to the Assessee. The Assessee is required to give consent, either accepting or rejecting the resolution within 30 days, if mutually agreeable dispute resolution has reached. MAP is an alternative dispute resolution mechanism under the tax treaties is popularly used to resolve the dispute relating to tax matters.

Tags : RULES   AMENDMENT   DISPUTE RESOLUTION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved