SC: Valid Bareboat Charter Termination Extinguishes Demise Charter, Vessel Arrest Vacated  ||  SC: Absence of Train Ticket No Ground to Deny Compensation for Passenger’s Death  ||  Patna HC: Routine FIR Involvement alone cannot Deny Arms Licence without Safety Threat  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: WhatsApp Chats Proving Mental Cruelty cannot be Ignored on Evidence Grounds  ||  Delhi HC: Foreign Travel Restrictions must not Obstruct Pregnant Foreigner's Medical Care  ||  MP High Court: Article 227 Cannot Be Invoked to Quash Wife’s Conjugal Rights Proceedings  ||  Kerala High Court Issues Directions on Driver Profiling, Bus Regulation and Road Safety  ||  Delhi HC: Prior Permission for Foreign Travel Unjustified When Accused Was Never Arrested  ||  Air India Penalised Rs. 50K Over De-boarding Disabled Woman and Wheelchair Damage  ||  Delhi HC: Muslim Personal Law cannot Shield Sex with Minor Wife from POCSO Case    

Smt. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Shri Raj Narain and Anr. - (Supreme Court) (07 Nov 1975)

Saving democracy from itself

MANU/SC/0304/1975

Constitution

This Supreme Court decision, arising out of an Allahabad High Court ruling that likely abetted a declaration of emergency, may have saved the nation’s democracy, and its unity. On trial stood Article 329-A of the Constitution, effected by the thirty-ninth Constitutional Amendment in 1975, purporting to take away challenge against election of the Prime Minister and Speaker of the House, save for by a body elected by Parliament. Essentially, it nullified all effect of the High Court’s decision calling into question Ms. Gandhi electoral tactics and voiding her election. Heavy handed? Definitely. Admirably diabolical? Possibly.

Unsurprisingly, the Court found the thirty-ninth Amendment, 1975 a bit damaging to the basic structure of the Constitution, which probably preferred “free, fair and pure election” over dictatorial rule. Clause (4) of Article 329-A of the Constitution was struck down for abolishing judicial review without providing another forum, extinguishing both the right and remedy to challenge validity of the election. However, the Supreme Court also noted that the High Court had been mistaken in its interpretation that voluntary expenditure by friends and relatives without request was expenditure by the candidate herself. Ultimately, Ms. Gandhi’s election was upheld, ironically, removing the need for all the political and constitutional machinations.

Relevant : His Holiness Kesavanada Bharati Sripadagalvaru v. State of Kerala MANU/SC/0445/1973 Kanwar Lal Gupta v. Amarnath Chawla MANU/SC/0277/1974 Article 329 of the Constitution Act Article 329-A of the Constitution Act

Tags : INDIRA GANDHI   PRIME MINISTER   ELECTION   MALPRACTICE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved