Delhi HC: Woman's Right to a Shared Household Does Not Allow Indefinite Occupation of In-Laws' Home  ||  Delhi HC: Director Disputes in a Company Do Not Qualify as Genuine Hardship to Delay ITR Filing  ||  Delhi HC: ECI Cannot Resolve Internal Disputes of Unrecognised Parties; Civil Court Must Decide  ||  Bombay High Court: Senior Citizens Act Cannot be Misused to Summarily Evict a Son  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Service Tax Refund Can't Be Denied on Limitation When Payment Was Made During Probe  ||  Supreme Court: If Tribunal Ends Case For Unpaid Fees, Parties Must Seek Recall Before Using S.14(2)  ||  SC: Article 226 Writs Jurisdiction Cannot be Used to Challenge Economic or Fiscal Reforms  ||  Supreme Court: Hostile Witness Testimony Can't Be Discarded; Consistent Parts Remain Valid  ||  Supreme Court: GPF Nomination in Favour of a Parent Becomes Invalid Once the Employee Marries  ||  Supreme Court: Candidate Not Disqualified if Core Subject Studied Without Exact Degree Title    

C.T.K.CHANDRAN v. STATE OF KERALA - (High Court of Kerala) (20 Mar 2020)

Imprisonment in default of payment of fine awarded on an accused in different cases cannot be ordered to run concurrently

MANU/KE/1008/2020

Criminal

The question that arises for consideration in this petition is, whether imprisonment in default of payment of fine awarded on an accused in a case can be ordered to run concurrently with imprisonment in default of payment of fine awarded on him in other cases.

The cases were instituted upon the complaints filed against the Petitioner by different persons for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Learned Magistrate convicted the Petitioner for the offence under Section 138 of the Act, 1881 in all the three cases.

This petition is filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) by the accused praying that the imprisonment awarded to him in the three cases, in default of payment of fine, may be ordered to run concurrently.

Section 427(1) of the CrPC provides that, when a person already undergoing a sentence of imprisonment is sentenced on a subsequent conviction to imprisonment or imprisonment for life, such imprisonment or imprisonment for life shall commence at the expiration of the imprisonment to which he has been previously sentenced, unless the Court directs that the subsequent sentence shall run concurrently with such previous sentence.

It is manifest from Section 427(1) of the CrPC that, the Court has the power and the discretion to issue a direction that the subsequent sentence of imprisonment shall run concurrently with the previous sentence of imprisonment. But, in the very nature of the power so conferred upon the Court, the discretionary power shall have to be exercised along judicial lines and not in a mechanical or pedantic manner. The legal position favours exercise of discretion to the benefit of the prisoner in cases where the prosecution is based on a single transaction.

In the case of the Petitioner, the three cases arise out of three different transactions. The complainant in the three cases are also different persons. The more important question is whether the provision contained in Section 427(1) of the CrPC has application to imprisonment in default of payment of fine awarded to an accused. Section 68 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) provides that the imprisonment which is imposed in default of payment of a fine shall terminate whenever that fine is either paid or levied by process of law.

Imprisonment in default of payment of fine cannot be deemed to be a sentence. It is a penalty which is incurred on account of non- payment of fine. A sentence is something which must be undergone unless it is set aside or remitted in part or in whole in appropriate proceedings. However, in case of imprisonment awarded in default of payment of fine, the accused may avoid it, by payment of the fine.

Since imprisonment in default of payment fine is not a sentence, Section 427(1) of the CrPC can have no application to such imprisonment awarded on an accused. Petition dismissed.

Tags : FINE   PAYMENT   DEFAULT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved