NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC  ||  SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation  ||  SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job  ||  NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights  ||  NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation  ||  Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation  ||  Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices  ||  Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear    

Calcutta HC: Authorities Undertaking Provisional Attachment Without Informing Bank, Contrary to Law - (27 Mar 2020)

GOODS AND SERVICES TAX

Calcutta High Court has held that Principal Additional Director General, Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (DGGI) and Additional Director General, DGGI are competent to pass orders under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Court further stated that the authorities undertaking provisional attachment beyond 1 year without informing the bank is contrary to the law.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   AUTHORITIES UNDERTAKING PROVISIONAL ATTACHMENT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved