Supreme Court: Award Valid Even If Passed After Mandate Expiry When Court Extends Time  ||  Jharkhand HC: Regular Bail Plea During Interim Bail is Not Maintainable under Section 483 BNSS  ||  Cal HC: Theft Claims and Public Humiliation Alone Don’t Amount To Abetment of Suicide U/S 306 IPC  ||  Delhi High Court: Elective Surgery Does Not Bar Grant of Interim Bail on Medical Grounds  ||  Delhi HC: Consensual Romance With Minor Nearing 18 May be Considered For Bail in POCSO Case  ||  Delhi HC: Not Named In FIR Doesn’t Matter If Financial Links Show Active Role in NDPS Offence  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Rape is an Affront to Womanhood and a Brutal Violation of The Right To Life  ||  Supreme Court: Single Insolvency Petition Maintainable Against Linked Corporate Entities  ||  Supreme Court: Disputes are Not Arbitrable When the Arbitration Agreement is Alleged to be Forged  ||  Supreme Court: Temple Trust Does Not Qualify as an ‘Industry’ under the Industrial Disputes Act    

Calcutta HC: Authorities Undertaking Provisional Attachment Without Informing Bank, Contrary to Law - (27 Mar 2020)

GOODS AND SERVICES TAX

Calcutta High Court has held that Principal Additional Director General, Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (DGGI) and Additional Director General, DGGI are competent to pass orders under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Court further stated that the authorities undertaking provisional attachment beyond 1 year without informing the bank is contrary to the law.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   AUTHORITIES UNDERTAKING PROVISIONAL ATTACHMENT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved