SC Stays Delhi HC’s Direction to Azure Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. to pay PPL as Per Tariff of RMPL || IP Office Declares Starbucks, NDTV and Economic Times as Well-Known Trademark || IP Office Declares Starbucks, NDTV and Economic Times as Well-Known Trademark || Allahabad HC: Liking a Post Does Not Amount to Publishing or Transmitting it || Supreme Court Criticizes Tahsildar Disobeying Directions of High Court || SC: Fresh Suit Not Valid Remedy to Set Aside Decree Obtained on Basis of Coerced Compromise || SC: When Strong Circumstantial Evidence Exists, Absence of Motive No Ground For Acquittal || SC: Court Should Not Interfere With Order Granting Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA || SC Advises Man to File Suit for Alleged Disability Due to Covishield Vaccine || Supreme Court: Need to Impose Timelimit for Oral Submissions in Arbitration Cases

Calcutta HC: Authorities Undertaking Provisional Attachment Without Informing Bank, Contrary to Law - (27 Mar 2020)

GOODS AND SERVICES TAX

Calcutta High Court has held that Principal Additional Director General, Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (DGGI) and Additional Director General, DGGI are competent to pass orders under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Court further stated that the authorities undertaking provisional attachment beyond 1 year without informing the bank is contrary to the law.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT AUTHORITIES UNDERTAKING PROVISIONAL ATTACHMENT

Share :