Madras HC: Police Superintendent not Liable For IO’s Delay In Filing Chargesheet or Closure Report  ||  Supreme Court: Provident Fund Dues Have Priority over a Bank’s Claim under the SARFAESI Act  ||  SC Holds Landowners Who Accept Compensation Settlements Cannot Later Seek Statutory Benefits  ||  Supreme Court: Endless Investigations and Long Delays in Chargesheets Can Justify Quashing  ||  Delhi HC: Arbitrator Controls Evidence and Appellate Courts Cannot Reassess Facts  ||  Delhi HC: ED Can Search Anyone Holding Crime Proceeds, not Just Those Named in Complaint  ||  Delhi HC: ED Can Search Anyone Holding Crime Proceeds, not Just Those Named in Complaint  ||  Delhi HC: Economic Offender Cannot Seek Travel Abroad For Medical Treatment When Available In India  ||  SC: Governors and President Have No Fixed Timeline To Assent To Bills; “Deemed Assent” is Invalid  ||  SC: Assigning a Decree For Specific Performance of a Sale Agreement Does Not Require Registration    

Calcutta HC: Authorities Undertaking Provisional Attachment Without Informing Bank, Contrary to Law - (27 Mar 2020)

GOODS AND SERVICES TAX

Calcutta High Court has held that Principal Additional Director General, Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (DGGI) and Additional Director General, DGGI are competent to pass orders under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Court further stated that the authorities undertaking provisional attachment beyond 1 year without informing the bank is contrary to the law.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   AUTHORITIES UNDERTAKING PROVISIONAL ATTACHMENT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved