SC: Every Member of Armed Forces Who Gets Disability Pension Need Not be Dragged to the Court  ||  SC: Every Member of Armed Forces Who Gets Disability Pension Need Not be Dragged to the Court  ||  NCLAT: When Revival Not Viable Option, Decision to Liquidate Corporate Debtor can’t be Faulted  ||  NCLAT: Creditors Not Party to Trusteeship Deed are Not Barred from Enforcing Personal Guarantee  ||  Del. HC: Courts Must Consider Social Background and Circumstances in Which Offences Take Place  ||  Del. HC: In Cases Covered Under S. 479 of BNSS, Courts Must Not Mechanically Adjourn Bail Pleas  ||  P&H HC: Before Issuing Notice to Lawyer for Misconduct, SBC must Have ‘Reason to Believe’  ||  SC: Can’t Infer Bias if Alleged Relatives of Appointees Did Not Participate in Interview  ||  SC: RP Containing Proposed Combination Should be Placed before CoC after Approval by CCI  ||  SC Set to Decide if Property of Accused under PC Act Can be Seized or Frozen    

Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kharagpur v. Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) and Ors. - (High Court of Delhi) (07 Aug 2015)

Pleadings allowed to be amended when 'petition ripe for hearing'

MANU/DE/2230/2015

Civil

The Court allowed an amendment of pleadings requiring a determination of jurisdiction by the court. The Court questioned whether the amendment was necessary for the determination of the dispute or if it added a new issue for adjudication. It concluded that there could not be any impediment in the determination of territorial jurisdiction as a preliminary issue.

Relevant : Revajeetu Builders and Developers vs. Narayanaswamy and Sons and Ors. MANU/SC/1724/2009 Vidyabai and Ors. vs. Padmalatha and Anr. MANU/SC/8401/2008 Kusum Ingots and Alloys Ltd. vs. Union of India (UOI) and Anr. MANU/SC/0430/2004

Tags : AMENDING PLEADING   TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved