SC Takes Objection of Allahabad High Court Order Blaming Victim in Rape Case  ||  Kerala HC: Interest Received by Assessee as Compensation under LAA to be Classified as ‘Capital Gains  ||  Calcutta HC: Disputes u/s 31 of SRA though Arbitrable, Arbitral Awards Not Binding on 3rd Parties  ||  SC Dismisses PIL Seeking Balanced Protection for All Parties in Matrimonial Disputes  ||  SC: Immediate Acton of Suspension of License if Infant is Trafficked from Any Hospital  ||  SC Proposes Independent Tribunal for Conducting Bar Elections in Haryana  ||  Supreme Court Invites Suggestions for Amendment of Supreme Court Rules, 2013  ||  SC Resolves Overlap between 'Design' and 'Copyright' Protection u/s 15(2) of the Copyright Act  ||  SC Stays J&K HC Order Directing Reduction in Toll-Fee Until Completion of Entire Road  ||  Tamil Nadu Government Notifies Acts on Basis of ‘Deemed Assent’ of Governor    

Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kharagpur v. Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) and Ors. - (High Court of Delhi) (07 Aug 2015)

Pleadings allowed to be amended when 'petition ripe for hearing'

MANU/DE/2230/2015

Civil

The Court allowed an amendment of pleadings requiring a determination of jurisdiction by the court. The Court questioned whether the amendment was necessary for the determination of the dispute or if it added a new issue for adjudication. It concluded that there could not be any impediment in the determination of territorial jurisdiction as a preliminary issue.

Relevant : Revajeetu Builders and Developers vs. Narayanaswamy and Sons and Ors. MANU/SC/1724/2009 Vidyabai and Ors. vs. Padmalatha and Anr. MANU/SC/8401/2008 Kusum Ingots and Alloys Ltd. vs. Union of India (UOI) and Anr. MANU/SC/0430/2004

Tags : AMENDING PLEADING   TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved