Del. HC: Rs. 1 Lakh Cost Imposed on Person Who Made Lord Hanuman Party in Property Dispute  ||  Ker. HC: Termination of 27 Weeks Pregnancy Citing Foetal Abnormalities Permitted  ||  SC: Inclined to Hold That Accused in One Case Shouldn’t be Denied Anticipatory Bail in Another Case  ||  Bom. HC: Bank Regis. with CERSAI has Priority Over DCST Against Proceeds of Enforce. under SARFAESI  ||  Bom. HC: Govt’s Amendment Exempting Private Schools from RTE Quota If Govt-Run School Nearby, Stayed  ||  Del. HC: Apart from ‘Good and Bad Touch’ Children Need to be Taught About ‘Virtual Touch’  ||  SC: Minimum 1/3rd Women's Reservation in SCBA Posts is on Experimental Basis  ||  SC: Can Apply Doctrine of ‘Lis Pendens’ Even if Section 52 of TPA Inapplicable in a State  ||  SC: Can Apply Doctrine of ‘Lis Pendens’ Even if Section 52 of TPA Inapplicable in a State  ||  Del HC: Accused’s Mobile Having Photos of Osama Bin Laden Not Enough to Label Him as ISIS Member    

SC: Statement u/s 161 CrPC Inadmissible in Evidence and Cannot be Relied Upon for Conviction - (03 Mar 2020)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has reiterated that a Statement recorded under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is inadmissible in evidence and cannot be relied upon or used to convict the accused, but can be used only to prove the contradictions and/or omissions.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   EVIDENCE TO UPHOLD CONVICTION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved