Supreme Court Issues Directions to Speed Up MACT Claims Amid Six-Year Average Pendency || Supreme Court: Sex Selection Practices Continues Due to Preference For Male Children || Supreme Court: Injury From a Fallen Tree is Not a Motor Accident for MACT Claims || Madras HC: Recent Tamil Nadu Elections Reflect Voting Beyond Caste and Community Considerations || Supreme Court: Children Should Not Undergo Psychological Tests in Custody Cases Unless Necessary || Jharkhand HC: Lokayukta Cannot Delegate Core Adjudicatory Powers Even in Case Against Brother || Ker HC: Complainant Can Invoke Presumptions After Proving Transaction, Cheque Execution Convincingly || Supreme Court Cancels SARFAESI Auction Sale After 16 Years Due to a 5-Day Payment Delay || Jhar HC Orders 2-Month Probe Deadline, DGP Monitoring to Overhaul Sexual Violence Response in State || Delhi HC: Social Media Cannot Undermine Judiciary; Intermediaries Must Act Without Court Orders

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :