Supreme Court: Confession Without Corroboration Cannot Form the Basis of Conviction || SC: Higher Land Acquisition Compensation to Some Owners Cannot Invalidate Awards to Others || SC: Prior Written Demand is Not Mandatory For an Industrial Dispute to Exist or be Referred || SC: Complaint U/S 175(4) BNSS Against a Public Servant Must Meet the Conditions of Section 175(3) || P&H HC: Customary Restrictions Can't Stop Widow From Alienating Non-Ancestral Property || Delhi High Court: SC's 'Mihir Rajesh Shah' Directive on Written Arrest Grounds Applies Prospectively || MP HC: MPPSC Cannot Reject Doctors For PG Additional Registration Not Mentioned in the Advertisement || Supreme Court: Registered Sale Deed Carries Strong Presumption of Genuineness || SC: Registry Cannot Intrude Into Judiciary’s Exclusive Domain By Questioning Why a Party is Impleaded || Calcutta HC: Third-Party Suits in a Deity’s Name are Allowed Only When The Sebait Loses Authority

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :