Supreme Court: States Have the Power to Regulate Industrial Alcohol || Ker. HC: If a Legislation Confers Benefit on Some Persons it Can be Applied Retrospectively || All. HC: When Warrant of Arrest is Issued, Applicant Not Entitled to Invoke Extraordinary Power || Del. HC: Non-Signatory's Action Aligning With Signatories Impresses that it’s a Veritable Party || SC: Order Passed Under Public Premises Act Doesn’t Bar Invocation of Arbitration Clause || SC Reserves Judgement on Striking Down UP Madarsa Education Act, 2004 || Supreme Court: HDFC Bank is a Juristic Person, Question of Mens Rea Does Not Arise || Mad. HC: Family Court should Ensure Conducting Proceedings Without Insisting Presence of Parties || Delhi High Court: Court Can Waive of Requirement to Furnish Surety, if Satisfied || Del. HC: Standard Required to be Met by Post Award S.9 Relief is Higher than Pre-Award S.9 Relief

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :