NCLAT: Can’t Dismiss Restoration App. if Filed in 30 Days from Date of Dismissal of Original App. || Delhi HC: Communication between Parties through Whatsapp Constitute Valid Agreement || Delhi HC Seeks Response from Govt. Over Penalties on Petrol Pumps Supplying Fuel to Old Vehicles || Centre Notifies "Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Rules, 2025" || Del. HC: Can’t Reject TM Owner’s Claim Merely because Defendant Could have Sought Removal of Mark || Bombay HC: Cannot Treat Sole Director of OPC, Parallelly with Separate Legal Entity || Delhi HC: Can Apply 'Family of Marks' Concept to Injunct Specific Marks || HP HC: Can’t Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree for Mere Irregularity || Cal. HC: Order by HC Bench Not Conferred With Determination by Roster is Void || Calcutta HC: Purchase Order Including Arbitration Agreement to Prevail Over Tax Invoice Lacking it

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :