Authorities Holding Public Auctions Must Disclose All Known Encumbrances and Related Litigation || SC: Compensatory Allowances Must Be Included While Computing Overtime Wages U/S 59 of Factories Act || SC: NGT Has No Jurisdiction to Decide Disputes Relating to Building Plan Violations || SC: Evidence is Often Fabricated Using AI And False Allegations are Rampant in Matrimonial Cases || SC: While Declining to Quash an FIR, A High Court Should Not Direct Police To Follow Section 41A CrPC || Allahabad High Court: Recruitment Rules Cannot Override Compassionate Appointments || Rajasthan HC: Single Blunt Blow Causing Grievous Injury is Not Attempt to Murder Without Intent || Karnataka High Court Holds Mining Leases Granted in Violation of Rule 22-D are Void Ab Initio || Supreme Court: Wait-Listed Candidates Have No Vested Right After List Expiry || SC: Reserved Candidates Scoring Above General Cut-Off Must be Considered For Open Posts

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :