Delhi HC: Maintenance is Intended to Safeguard Dependent Spouse & Child’s Right to Live With Dignity || Delhi HC: Any Person in India Has the Right to Legally Import Goods from Abroad || Bombay HC: Can’t Quash Rape Cases on the Basis of Compromise || Madras HC: Can’t Tap Individual’s Phone to Uncover Suspected Crime || Karnataka HC: Women Commuters Oppose Ban on Bike Taxis in Karnataka || Delhi HC: Inclusive Education is About Recognising That Every Child Has a Place in Classroom || Delhi HC: Patanjali to Not Run Ads that are Disparaging to Dabur Products || Delhi HC Upholds Rule Restricting Retention of GPRA by Central Armed Police Forces || Delhi HC: Disability Pension Ensures that a Soldier is Not Left Without Support || SC Declines Petition by Lalit Modi against BCCI Seeking Indemnification

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :