Delhi HC: Girl Being Friendly on Valentine’s Day Does Not Justify Forced Sexual Activity under POCSO || Delhi HC: Street Vendors Must Maintain Cleanliness and Not Encroach on Public Spaces || Delhi HC: Victim’s Negligence Cannot Bar Compensation in Railway Accident Cases || Jharkhand HC: Pre-1947 Transfers Exempt from Section 46; 45-Year Delay Blocks Restoration || Delhi HC: Mediation Settlement Does Not Remove Criminal Liability But Can be Considered For Bail || Delhi High Court: Newslaundry Acted Maliciously and Showed Intolerance Toward TV Today || SC: New Tree Growth on Land Approved For Development Does Not Qualify it as 'Deemed Forest' || SC: Confiscation Proceedings Can Continue Against Wife of Deceased Public Servant with Illicit Asset || Supreme Court: Strict Procedure Must be Followed under UP Gangsters Act Due to Serious Consequences || Supreme Court: HCs Can Go Beyond FIR to Quash Frivolous or Vexatious Criminal Cases

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :