Kerala HC: Persons With Down Syndrome Get Protection and Guardianship under National Trust Act, 1999 || J&K&L HC: Contractual Staff Cannot Claim Payment Beyond Contract Period Without Proving Work || J&K&L HC: Revisional Powers U/S 15 Must be Exercised in Reasonable Time, Not After 20-Year Delay || MP High Court: Revoking Building Permission Without Fraud Proof Violates Right to Property || Madras HC: Centre’s Consent For Remission is Needed only When Sentence under Central Act is Ongoing || Delhi HC: Private School Employees Entitled to Child Care Leave Equivalent to Government Employees || Supreme Court Has Released Draft Regulations on AI Use in the Judiciary and Invited Public Feedback || Supreme Court: MMDR Act Royalty Hikes Prevail over Contractual Terms || Delhi HC: Daughter-In-Law Has No Independent Right in Mother-In-Law’s Self-Acquired House || SC: Prolonged Separation Can Constitute Cruelty and Desertion

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :