MP High Court: Estranged Husband Entitled to Loss of Consortium Compensation After Wife’s Death || J&K & Ladakh HC: Claims under Roshni Act Void Ab Initio, Ownership Rights Null from Inception || Madras High Court Directs Expedited Trials in 216 Pending Criminal Cases Against MPs and MLAs || MP High Court: Allowing Minor to Drive Without Valid License Constitutes Breach of Insurance Policy || Punjab & Haryana High Court: Cyber Fraud Cases Uphold Public Trust, Cannot Be Quashed by Compromise || SC: Customer-Banker Relationship Based on Mutual Trust, Postmaster’s Reinstatement Quashed || Supreme Court: Company Buying Software for Efficiency and Profit Is Not a ‘Consumer’ under CPA || SC: Long Custody or Trial Delay Not Ground for Bail in Commercial Narcotic Cases if S.37 Unmet || Calcutta HC Disqualifies Politician Mukul Roy from Assembly under Anti-Defection Law || Supreme Court Bans Mining in and Around National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :