Allahabad High Court : Deceased Farmer’s Odd Jobs Don’t Bar Family from Scheme Benefits || Secured Creditors' Dues Take Priority Over Govt Claims: Allahabad HC on SARFAESI & RDB Acts || Daughter Can’t Claim Mitakshara Father’s Property if He Died Pre-1956 & Son Survives: HC || Gujarat High Court: Sessions Court Can’t Suspend Sentence Just to Allow Revision Filing || Delhi High Court: Non-Combat Security Roles Crucial; Minor Lapse Risks National Safety || Punjab & Haryana HC: Allegation of Harassment Alone Insufficient to Prove Abetment to Suicide || Orissa HC: Directors Liable under S.138 NI Act Despite Company’s Insolvency || Bombay HC: GST Return Details of Company Exempt from Disclosure under RTI Act || Chhattisgarh HC: Timely Appointment of Electronic Evidence Examiners Vital in Cyber Crime Probes || Bombay HC: GST Return Details of Company Exempt from Disclosure under RTI Act

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :