Delhi HC: Hymen Rupture is Not Required to Prove Penetrative Sexual Assault under the POCSO Act || Delhi HC: Organised Crime Groups Exploit Juveniles, Misuse Juvenile Justice Laws for Serious Crimes || Patna HC Directs Smooth Lok Adalat For Traffic Challan Settlement, Ensuring Access to Justice || Supreme Court Holds Revenue Records Alone Do Not Confer Title Over Land Ownership || SC: Disciplinary Authority Cannot Punish Employee Without Fresh Show-Cause Notice on New Charges || Supreme Court: No Separate Plea is Needed to Cancel Agreement to Sell For Buyer’s Default || Supreme Court Directs District Collectors to Strictly Implement Solid Waste Management Rules 2026 || Bombay HC: Courts Cannot Mandate Mediation under Mediation Act 2023 Without Mutual Consent || Kerala HC: Embassy NOC Not Required For Indian-Foreigner Marriage under Special Marriage Act || MP High Court: Penalty May Stand if Misconduct is Proven, Even if Inquiry is Vitiated

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :