Supreme Court Outlines Principles Governing Exercise of Jurisdiction under Article 227 || Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Pawan Khera in an FIR Filed by Assam Police || SC Issues Guidelines on Summary Judgment in Commercial Suits under Order XIII-A CPC || J&K&L High Court: Post-Conviction NDPS Bail Cannot Rest on Long Incarceration Alone || Gauhati HC: Promotion Cannot be Withheld Merely Because Investigation is Pending Without Chargesheet || Kar HC: Preventive Detention under Goonda Act Cannot Rest on Offences Committed During Juvenile Age || Bombay HC: National Security Justifies Denial of Police Clearance Certificate || Bombay HC: Comic Remarks Without Malicious Intent Not Religious Insult || J&K&L High Court: Scandalous Allegations Against Judicial Officers in Pleadings Impermissible || P&H HC: Writ Petition Against Private Trust's Contractual Employment Dismissed

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :