Madhya Pradesh High Court: Victims Must be Given a Hearing Even Before Closure Report Rejection || Delhi HC: Payment of ‘Pagri’ Does Not Render Tenancy Non-Terminable, Allowing Eviction || Ker HC Examined Whether Electro-Homeopathy Can be Practised Without Registration under Medical Laws || Delhi HC: Better Possessory Title Holder Can Recover Property From Occupant Without Superior Right || Bombay High Court: Compensatory Afforestation Must Be in Same or Nearby Locality For Residents || Bombay High Court Protects ‘MEFTAL-SPAS’, Restrains Use of Similar Drug Brand || Supreme Court: Inclusion in Revised Select List Does Not Give TN MV Inspectors a Vested Right || Bombay HC: ICC Cannot Hear Sexual Harassment Complaint over Non-Employer Transport Incident || Ker HC Upholds Rule that Homeopathic Doctors Must Cancel Registration Before Enrolment as Advocates || J&K&L HC: Evidence Negating Penetration Warrants Conviction For Attempt to Rape, Not Rape

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :