Gujarat HC Grants Bail to Marriage Bureau Owner, Finds No Link to Alleged ‘Looteri Dulhan’ Gang || Calcutta HC: Minor’s Consent has No Mitigating Effect in POCSO Sexual Assault Cases || Orissa HC Commutes Death Sentence, Says Emotion Cannot Override Established Law || Calcutta HC: Street Vendors Act Protects Lawful Vending, Not Illegal Encroachments || P&H HC: Courts Cannot Reveal Identities of Children in Conflict With Law in Court Records || Bombay HC: Government Cannot Fix ‘Politically Convenient’ Election Dates sets Goa Poll Timeline || SC: Major Port Trusts Liable for Customs Duty on Pilfered Goods under Customs Act || Supreme Court: General Fraud Allegations Cannot Extend Limitation under Section 74 CGST Act || SC: ‘No Coercive Steps’ Order Cannot Restrain Filing of Charge Sheet || Chhattisgarh HC: Maintenance for Autistic Child May Continue Beyond 18 Until Self-Sufficient

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :