Delhi HC: Woman's Right to a Shared Household Does Not Allow Indefinite Occupation of In-Laws' Home || Delhi HC: Director Disputes in a Company Do Not Qualify as Genuine Hardship to Delay ITR Filing || Delhi HC: ECI Cannot Resolve Internal Disputes of Unrecognised Parties; Civil Court Must Decide || Bombay High Court: Senior Citizens Act Cannot be Misused to Summarily Evict a Son || Chhattisgarh HC: Service Tax Refund Can't Be Denied on Limitation When Payment Was Made During Probe || Supreme Court: If Tribunal Ends Case For Unpaid Fees, Parties Must Seek Recall Before Using S.14(2) || SC: Article 226 Writs Jurisdiction Cannot be Used to Challenge Economic or Fiscal Reforms || Supreme Court: Hostile Witness Testimony Can't Be Discarded; Consistent Parts Remain Valid || Supreme Court: GPF Nomination in Favour of a Parent Becomes Invalid Once the Employee Marries || Supreme Court: Candidate Not Disqualified if Core Subject Studied Without Exact Degree Title

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :