Bombay HC: National Security Justifies Denial of Police Clearance Certificate || Bombay HC: Comic Remarks Without Malicious Intent Not Religious Insult || J&K&L High Court: Scandalous Allegations Against Judicial Officers in Pleadings Impermissible || P&H HC: Writ Petition Against Private Trust's Contractual Employment Dismissed || Gujarat HC: Customary Divorce Entitles Daughter to Family Pension || Calcutta HC: ECI's Prerogative to Deploy Central Employees as Counting Supervisors Upheld || Calling the Situation Grim, the Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Delays in NCLT Approvals || Supreme Court: Admission of a Claim by a Resolution Professional is Not Debt Acknowledgment || Supreme Court: Public Figures Must Exercise Caution as Their Words Have Consequences in Society || SC: State Must Act as a Model Employer, Criticising the Union For Not Regularising ISRO Workers

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :