Supreme Court: Banks Cannot Invoke IBC Against Debtors For Builder-Linked Loans || Supreme Court: Non-Disclosure of Failed Candidates’ Marks Does Not Imply They Passed Exams || Supreme Court: Murder Accused Cannot Inherit Property of the Person Allegedly Killed || Supreme Court: Delay in Deposit Does Not Automatically Cancel Contracts under Specific Relief Act || SC: Railways is Treated as a Consumer under the Electricity Act, Not a Distribution Licensee || Bom HC: Genuine Residents Cannot be Denied Relief Due to Aadhaar Deactivation or Biometric Mismatch || Punjab & Haryana High Court: Raid on Rajinder Gupta’s Factory Soon After He Joined BJP From AAP || Madhya Pradesh HC: Delay Can Be Condoned under Limitation Act Where Statute Has No Express Bar || Cal HC Upholds PILs on Great Nicobar Project, Noting Alleged FRA Violations and Tribal Vulnerability || Calcutta HC: Vodafone Idea Must Obtain Copyright Society Licence to Use Songs as Caller Tunes

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :