Supreme Court: Spouse Cannot Withdraw Consent for Mutual Divorce After Settlement Agreement || Supreme Court Suspends PC Act Sentence of Former Minister Anosh Ekka, Flags Overlapping CBI Cases || Supreme Court: Magistrate’s Probe Order Can’t be Quashed on Accused’s Defence || Delhi High Court: No Adverse Inference if Handwriting Sample Refused Without Section 73 Disclosure || J&K&L HC: Bank Officials Not Entitled to Section 197 CrPC Protection Despite Public Servant Status || Kar HC Orders CBI Probe into 53-Acre Land Acquisition, Citing Alleged Monumental Fraud & Conspiracy || Supreme Court Grants Probation to Convicts; Rules Fine-Only Cases Also Eligible || SC Disposes Plea on Allied Health Course Moratorium After NCAHP Issues 2026–27 Guideline || Supreme Court Grants Promotion Relief to Employee Denied Relaxation, Calling it Discrimination || Patna HC: Tender Lapses if Not Extended on Time & Delay Cannot be Cured by Repeated Representations

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :