All HC: Municipal Corp. to Ensure Availability of Clean Drinking Water to Residents of Lucknow || Bom. HC: Bail Granted to Accused Who Wasn’t Produced Before Court on Seventy Previous Dates || Delhi HC Seeks Explan. from Legal Services Committee on Failure to Assist Litigant Despite Requests || Hemant Soren, Former CM of Jharkhand Moves SC After HC Dismissed Challenge to His Arrest by ED || CESTAT: No Provision in Cenvat Credit Rules to Allow Cash Refund of Cess in Cenvat Credit Balance || Delhi High Court: Parents to Bear Cost of Air Conditioning Services in Schools || Ker. HC: Declining a Rape Victim to Terminate Pregnancy Violates Right to Live With Dignity || SC: Can’t Apply Section 498A IPC Mechanically in All Cases of Ill-Treatment by Husband || SC: To Summon Person u/s 319 CrPC as Additional Accused, Stronger Evidence is Needed || SC: Trial Judges Should Take Participatory Role in Trial & Not Act as Mere Tape Recorders

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :