SC: Completed Trial can't be Remanded for Procedural Lapse Unless Prejudice is Proven || SC: Sessions Courts Cannot Bar Statutory Remission and Commutation Through Special Sentences || SC: Article 311 Bar Inapplicable If Removing Officer Equals Appointing Authority in Status || SC: Contractual Bar Prevents Arbitral Tribunal From Awarding Pre-Reference Interest || SC Frames Guidelines to Prevent POCSO Act Misuse by Parents in Custody Disputes || Delhi HC Directs DLSA to Convey Trial Court’s Encouraging Message and Compensation to POCSO Survivor || Delhi HC: Gravity of UAPA Offence Cannot Justify Prolonged PMLA Detention || Delhi HC Affirms Equestrian Federation's Youth Olympics Selection, Calls for Clearer Norms & Timeline || Delhi HC: Ajeet Bharti Used Caste Superiority to Humiliate Chandrashekhar Azad || Supreme Court: Anti-Suit Injunction Cannot Rest on Speculation of Unenforceable Foreign Decree

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :