P&H High Court: Re-Investigation Cannot Nullify Existing Acquittal Despite Breach of Stay Order || Gujarat HC: Illegal Mining Vehicle Complaints Must Be Filed Before Sessions Court, Not Magistrate || Delhi High Court Lays Down Registry Directions for Dealing with Insufficiently Stamped Arbitral Award || Delhi High Court: Victims Need No Leave to Appeal Acquittal or Conviction for Lesser Offence || SC: Limitation Act Inapplicable to Revisions under Karnataka Land Revenue Act || SC: Banks Can Invoke SARFAESI for Loans Acquired from NBFCs Outside the Act || SC: Gujarat Prohibition Act Does not Bar Interim Seized Vehicle Release || Supreme Court Quashes Rs. 425-Crore Customs Penalty Based on AI-Generated Fake Case Laws || SC: Guilt cannot be Presumed Solely Due to Collusion Allegations against Investigating Officer || SC: Clarificatory Statement Does Not Constitute a Binding Undertaking for Contempt Proceedings

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :