Allahabad High Court: Husband's Liability under the Domestic Violence Act Continues Despite Divorce || Bombay HC: Municipal Council Must Pay for Land Used as DP Road Despite Fund Shortage || Uttarakhand HC: Previous Service Pay Protection Does Not Confer Right to Career Progression Benefits || Supreme Court Revives POCSO Case Against Headmistress, Says Verifying Abuse Claims is No Excuse || SC: Voluminous Documents are No Excuse For Their Delayed Production under Commercial Courts Act || Supreme Court Orders Merged Bank's Eviction For Transferring Tenancy Without Landlord's Consent || SC: Oraon Tribe Custom Doesn't Allow Uncle-In-Law to Adopt Niece's Husband as Ghar Damad || Kerala HC Approves New Public Prosecutor Appointment Guidelines After a Minor Revision || Rajasthan HC Clarifies Criminal Writ Petitions Have No Separate Constitutional Status || Delhi HC Clarifies if Whatsapp Acknowledgment Can Make an Arbitral Award Binding

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :