MP HC Sets Aside Order Recognising Saif Ali Khan & Family as Heirs of Nawab of Bhopal's Properties || Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Petitions Challenging Bihar Electoral Roll Revision on July 10 || NCLT: Dissolution under IBC Can’t Be Used to Frustrate Ongoing Criminal Prosecution under PMLA || Union Government Notifies Waqf Rules 2025 || Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Challenging Results & Answer Key of NEET-UG 2025 Exam || SC Introduces Reservations for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in Staff Recruitments || NCLAT: Restoration Application Can't Be Dismissed if Filed Within 30 Days of Dismissal of OA || NCLAT: Single WhatsApp Message Sent Long Ago Can't Become Foundation to Reject Petition U/S 9 of IBC || CJI Launches Live Streaming Of Bombay HC Proceedings || AP HC Directs Magistrates to follow SC Guidelines Before Remanding a Person Booked For Posts

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :