Kerala High Court: ED Can Investigate Without FIR in Scheduled Offence Cases (CMRL Matter) || Delhi High Court Upholds TRAI Rule Capping TV Advertisements at 12 Minutes Per Hour || Supreme Court Directs High Courts to Deliver Judgments in 3 Months and Bail Orders in One Day || Supreme Court: Successful Resolution Applicant Cannot Negotiate Further After CoC Approval || Supreme Court: Succession Law Applies, Not Primogeniture, to Ex-Royal’s Private Estate Inheritance || Supreme Court: Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Challenge Arbitrator’s Section 16 Decision || Supreme Court: Sanyasi Status Cannot Be Ground to Reject Land Compensation Claim || Supreme Court: Section 33(1)(a) of Arbitration Act Cannot Alter Nature of Interest in Award || Supreme Court: Society Office Bearers Not Liable for Cheque Dishonour Without Active Business Role || Supreme Court: Asking a Woman to Adjust in Marriage Does Not Amount to Cruelty By In-Laws

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :