SC: Magistrates Should Not Record Prosecution Evidence in Sessions-Triable Cases || Supreme Court Lays Down Guidelines on Using ITRs to Assess Motor Accident Victims' Income || Supreme Court: Citing AI-Generated Fake Precedents Amounts to Advocate Misconduct || Bombay HC: Horse-Trading Rampant in Maharashtra, FIRs 'Washed' After Switching Sides || Tripura High Court: Senior Citizens Cannot be Penalised For Failing to Follow Cases Online || Delhi High Court: Parent Cannot Gain Advantage by Keeping a Child Against a Foreign Court Order || Allahabad HC: Places of Worship Act Bars Conversion of Religious Character, Not State Acquisition || Jharkhand HC: Single Instance of Mother-In-Law Abusing Daughter-In-Law Does Not Amount to Cruelty || Madras High Court: No Appeal Lies Against E-Court Status or Adjournment Orders || Chhattisgarh HC: Judicial Officer Promotion Cannot be Denied on Complaint Without Disciplinary Action

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :