CCI Dismisses Complaint Against Rapido over Use of Private Vehicles in Bike Taxi Service || Allahabad HC: State Must Protect Individuals Threatened for Conducting Prayers in Private Spaces || Madras HC: Habeas Corpus Petition Cannot Be Used if Wife Voluntarily Elopes with Another Man || Calcutta High Court: Post-VRS Service Benefits Cannot be Denied; Ex-Employees Entitled to Arrears || SC: SAIL Can Withhold Gratuity to Adjust Penal Rent if Ex-Employees Illegally Retain Quarters || Supreme Court: Appellate Courts Should Not Easily Alter MACT Compensation Awards || Supreme Court: Quashing FIR in Forgery Case Unjustified While Handwriting Expert’s Report Pending || Raj HC: Convicted Minor Gang Rapist Not Fully Barred From Open-Air Camps; Rules Allow Exceptions || Calcutta High Court: Serving a Show-Cause Notice Via Email is Valid under PMLA Regulations || Del HC: Candidate’s Independent Medical Opinions Don’t Justify Fresh Medical Exam in SSC Recruitment

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :