Patna HC: Possessing Cough Syrup With under 2.5% Codeine Without Authorisation Attracts the NDPS Act || Madras HC: Person Who Converts to Islam Cannot Claim Backward Class Muslim Status || Madras High Court Lays Down Guidelines For Surrogacy Custody and Parentage Applications || Bombay High Court: Residence Proof is Mandatory For RTE Neighbourhood School Admissions || Madras HC Strikes Down TN Law Mandating Registrar’s Title Verification Before Property Registration || Bombay HC Allows Galli News to Report Medical Negligence But Bars Defamatory Hospital Imputations || Supreme Court: Parents’ Loss Cannot Be Measured With Arithmetical Precision || Supreme Court: Registered Sale Deed Remains Valid Despite Minor Attestation Discrepancies || Calcutta High Court: Section 107 BNSS Property Attachment Cannot be Used as a Recovery Tool || Ker HC: Elected Representatives Must Swear by God or Affirm, Cannot Invoke Specific Deities in Oath

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :