Bombay HC: Wife Humiliating Husband in Front of His Friends is Amounts to Cruelty || Delhi HC Interprets Doctrine of “Compelled Self-Publication”, || Del. HC Issues Summons to Campus Sutra in Trademark Infringement Suit Filed by Footwear Brand Campus || Bombay HC Dismisses PIL Seeking Restraining Order against PRADA || Delhi HC: Cannot Bypass Bar on Revision of Interlocutory Order by Invoking Inherent Jurisdiction || Delhi HC: Prosecutrix’s Refusal to Undergo Medical Examination Weakens the Case || Bom. HC: No Provision under JJ Act that Allows Adoption of a Child of Foreign Citizenship || SC Passes Order to Prevent Russian Mother’s Attempt to Flee with Child || SC: Deprivation of Natural Heir from Will May Not Raise Suspicion || SC: Denying Female Heir Right in Property Only Exacerbates Gender Division

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 Aug 2015)

Number of transactions, not number of documents for stamp duty

MANU/SC/0851/2015

Civil

In a case where the mortgagor borrowed from 13 banks in one instrument, the agreement fell under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, the Court held. Though there was one instrument chronicling the transactions, the borrower had entered into 13 distinct loan agreements.

Relevant : Section 5 Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Act The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall MANU/SC/0002/1955

Tags : STAMP DUTY NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS ONE INSTRUMENT

Share :