NCLAT: IRP Has Authority to Take Possession of Assets Owned by Corporate Debtor || NCLAT: NCLT Can Direct Forwarding a Copy of its Order to Relevant Statutory Authorities || Delhi HC: Centre to Expedite Process of Accessibility Features in OTT platforms for PwDs || Delhi HC: Once Worker Provides Testimony Under Oath ‘Burden of Proof’ Shifts on Employer || SC: There Cannot be Discrimination in Matter of Payment of Pension to Retired Judges || SC: India is Not a Dharamshala that Can Entertain Foreign Nationals from All Over || SC: Can Quash Domestic Violence Act Complaints Under Section 482 of CrPC || Supreme Court: Can’t Use Statement of One Accused against Another || SC: Inclusion of Name in Draft NRC Cannot Annul Foreigners Tribunal’s Declaration as Non-Citizen || Supreme Court: Minimum Practice of 3 Years Mandatory to Enter Judicial Service

Supreme Court: Electricity Supply Cannot Be Disconnected For Recovery of Additional Demand - (20 Feb 2020)

ELECTRICITY

Supreme Court has held that the licensee company cannot take recourse to the coercive measure of disconnection of electricity supply, for recovery of the additional demand raised after the expiry of two years limitation period. The Court observed that the Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 does not preclude the licensee company from raising an additional or supplementary demand after the expiry of the limitation period in the case of a mistake or bona fide error.

Tags : SUPREME COURT ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ADDITIONAL DEMAND

Share :