Supreme Court: Permanent Alimony Should not Penalize the Husband || SC Reserves Judgement on Plea by Transwoman Whose Appointment was Cancelled on Gender Identity || Lok Sabha Introduces the Merchant Shipping Bill, 2024 || NCLAT: If Liquidation Cost Not Paid as Per Regulations, Security Interest Shall Stand Relinquished || SC Refers to Larger Bench Conflicting Interpretation Surrounding Sections 14(1) & 14(2) of HSA || Supreme Court: There Has Been a Growing Tendency to Misuse Section 498A of IPC by Wife || Inordinate Delay in Execution of Death Sentence has a Dehumanising Effect on Accused || PC Granted to Woman Army Officer Who Was Denied Benefits Given to Similarly Situated Others || If Bodily Injury Caused with Lethal Weapon, Lack of Intention to Cause Murder Irrelevant || Must AddSection 304(II) of IPC In Accidents Involving Drunk Drivers

Supreme Court: Electricity Supply Cannot Be Disconnected For Recovery of Additional Demand - (20 Feb 2020)

ELECTRICITY

Supreme Court has held that the licensee company cannot take recourse to the coercive measure of disconnection of electricity supply, for recovery of the additional demand raised after the expiry of two years limitation period. The Court observed that the Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 does not preclude the licensee company from raising an additional or supplementary demand after the expiry of the limitation period in the case of a mistake or bona fide error.

Tags : SUPREME COURT ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ADDITIONAL DEMAND

Share :