Delhi HC: JD Cannot Move Objections u/s 47 of CPC against Execution of Award || Del HC Refers to Larger Bench the Issue if Suit for Infringement Lies Against Proprietors of TM || Delhi HC: For Wrongful Availment of ITC, Rampant Misuse of S.16 Will Create Enormous Dent || Del. HC: Wife Leaving Work to Take Care of Child Cannot be Called as Voluntary Abandonment || Bombay HC: Wife to Provide Voice Samples to Prove Allegations by Husband of Extra Marital Affair || SC Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sec. 5A of Kerala GST Act & Section 7A of Tamil Nadu GST Act || SC: Use of Volume-Based Rebates Does Not Constitute Abuse of Dominant Position || SC: Under P&C Act Non-Public Servant Can be Convicted for Abetting Offences || SC: IO’s Testimony Based Only on Section 161 CrPC Statements of Witnesses is Not Admissible || NCLT Delhi: Can’t Adjust Payment Made for Specific Invoice Against Back Dated Invoices

CESTAT, New Delhi: Importer Not Obliged to Pay Any Amount on Advertisement and Sale Promotion - (18 Feb 2020)

CUSTOMS

Custom, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi has held that the expenditure incurred on the activities of advertisement and sale promotion will not be borne by the importer especially when there is no contract. The Tribunal further observed that the activity of advertisement and sales promotion is a post-import activity incurred by the Applicant discharge on his own account and not for the discharge for any obligation of the seller under the terms of the sale.

Tags : CUSTOMS EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ADVERTISEMENT AND SALE PROMOTION

Share :