Del. HC: Denying Seat to Candidate Due to Administrative Fault Would be Unjust || All. HC: Not Mandatory for Passport Authority to Impound Passport of Accused Persons || Raj. HC: In Absence of Statutory Rules, Denying Appt. on Basis of Minimum Height is Discriminatory || MP HC: Party Required to Lay Factual Foundation for Getting Benefit of Section 65 of Evidence Act || Ker. HC: Settlement of Cases Including Offence of Rape & POCSO Act Offences is Not Permissible || Gujarat High Court: Wife Allowed to Become Guardian & Manager of Husband in Coma || SC: Partition of Property Can’t be Done by Metes & Bounds in Chandigarh || SC Approves Requirement for Judicial Officers to be Converse With Local Language || Kerala High Court: Denial of Ordinary Leave Reduces Convict’s Chances of Rehabilitation || Delhi HC Issues Circular Regarding Pass-Overs or Adjournments in Bail, Parole Matters

CESTAT, New Delhi: Importer Not Obliged to Pay Any Amount on Advertisement and Sale Promotion - (18 Feb 2020)

CUSTOMS

Custom, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi has held that the expenditure incurred on the activities of advertisement and sale promotion will not be borne by the importer especially when there is no contract. The Tribunal further observed that the activity of advertisement and sales promotion is a post-import activity incurred by the Applicant discharge on his own account and not for the discharge for any obligation of the seller under the terms of the sale.

Tags : CUSTOMS EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ADVERTISEMENT AND SALE PROMOTION

Share :