Supreme Court: Promotion Suitability Must be Decided by Experts, Courts Cannot Create New Methods  ||  SC: Market Integrity is Paramount; Rule Violators Cannot Escape Liability by Citing Investor Gains  ||  SC: Plaintiff's Reply to Counterclaim in Commercial Suits Must Meet Written Statement Deadline  ||  SC: Pre-2016 Debt Recovery Tribunal Recovery Certificates Cannot Support Insolvency Notices  ||  SC: Children's Court Cannot Try Child as Adult Without Passing a Reasoned Order under JJ Act  ||  SC: Contractual Clauses Denying Interest on Security Deposits Does Not Violate Public Policy  ||  J&K&L HC: Unamended Pleading Loses Effect After Amendment; Party Cannot Benefit From Own Default  ||  Allahabad HC: Wife's Maintenance Need Not be Fixed at 25% of Husband's Net Income  ||  Kerala HC: Social Customs Alone Cannot Prove Bride Entrusted Gold to Husband or In-Laws  ||  Karnataka HC: Century Club Qualifies as a Public Authority under the RTI Act Due to Land Grant    

Relaxation of additional fees and extension of last date in filing of forms MGT-7 (Annual Return) and AOC-4 (Financial Statement) under the Companies Act, 2013-UT of J&K and UT of Ladakh- (Ministry of Corporate Affairs) (31 Jan 2020)

MANU/DCAF/0012/2020

Company

Sir

In continuation to General Circular No. 15/2019 dated 28-11-2019 and keeping in view of the requests received from various stakeholders stating that due to disturbances in internet services and the normal work was affected in the UT of J&K and UT of Ladakh and sought extension of time for filing of financial statements for the financial year ended 31.03.2019. Therefore, it has been decided to further extend the due date for filing of e-forms AOC-4, AOC-4 (CFS) AOC-4 XBRL and e-form MGT-7 upto 31.03.2020, for companies having jurisdiction in the UT of J&K and UT of Ladakh without levy of additional fee.

2. This issues with the approval of the competent authority.

Tags : ANNUAL RETURN   COMPANIES ACT   2013  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved