Delhi HC: Non-Proof of Hearing Notice Dispatch Doesn’t by Itself Show no Personal Hearing Was Given  ||  Delhi High Court: No Construction or Residence Allowed on Yamuna Floodplains, Even For Graveyards  ||  J&K High Court: Right to Speedy Trial Includes Appeals; Closes 46-Year-Old Criminal Case Due to Delay  ||  J&K High Court: Courts Must Not Halt Corruption Probes, Refuses to Quash FIR  ||  J&K&L HC: Matrimonial Remedies May Overlap, But Cruelty Claims Cannot be Selectively Invoked  ||  Delhi High Court: Customs Officials Acting Officially Cannot be Cross-Examined as of Right  ||  J&K&L HC: Second Arbitral Reference is Maintainable if Award is Set Aside Without Deciding Merits  ||  J&K&L HC: Gold Voluntarily Given to Customer is 'Entrustment'; Theft Excluded from Insurance Cover  ||  Delhi HC: Working Mothers Cannot be Forced to Bear Full Childcare Burden While Fathers Evade Duty  ||  J&K&L HC: Arbitral Tribunal Not a “Court”; Giving False Evidence Before it Doesn’t Attract S.195 CrPC    

State of Kerala and Ors. vs. Rajesh and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (24 Jan 2020)

The jurisdiction of the Court to grant bail is circumscribed by the provisions of Section 37 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985

MANU/SC/0084/2020

Narcotics

The appellant-prosecution had challenged the direction exercised by the learned Single Judge of the Kerala High Court in granting post- arrest bail to accused respondents without noticing the mandate of Section 37(1)(b)(ii)of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS) under the order impugned dated 10 May 2019 followed with the 12 June 2019 rejecting the application filed by the Appellant under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) for recalling the order of post arrest bail dated 10 May 2019.

The Court observed that the scheme of Section 37 reveals the exercise of granting bail is subject to limitations under Section 439 of CrPC and the non obstante clause under Section 37.The operative part of the section prescribes two conditions which have to be satisfied to enlarge bail of a person accused under NDPS Act. The first condition entails giving the prosecution an opportunity to oppose the application and the second condition requires that the Court has to be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that he is not guilty of the offence.

If either of these two conditions is not satisfied, bail cannot be granted. The expression ‘reasonable grounds’ means something more than prima facie grounds and contemplated in the provision requires existence of such facts and circumstances as are sufficient in themselves to justify satisfaction that the accused is not guilty of the alleged offence.

There cannot be a liberal approaching the matter of bail in Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

Tags : JURISDICTION   NARCOTICS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved