NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC  ||  SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation  ||  SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job  ||  NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights  ||  NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation  ||  Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation  ||  Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices  ||  Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear    

ITAT: Normal Business Advances Not in Nature of ‘Loan’ are Not Deemed Dividend - (21 Jan 2020)

DIRECT TAXATION

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi has held that the transaction where advance is received in the normal course of business and which is not taken as a loan cannot be considered as Deemed Dividend. The Tribunal further observed that the advance received from the company by the Assessee is in the nature of trade advance against the booking of commercial place being built by the Assessee and cannot be considered as deemed dividend under section 2(22) (e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Tags : INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   BUSINESS ADVANCES   DEEMED DIVIDEND  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved