Del. HC: Severity of Offence Can’t Disentitle Foreigner to Get Parole for Filing SLP || Cal. HC: Can’t Compound Proceedings u/s 138 NI Act at Revision Stage Without Complainant’s Consent || Bom. HC: There Should be Some Accountability Fixed on Courts in Cases of Prolonged Incarceration || Tel. HC: Employee Can’t be Denied Promotion on Pretext of Pendency Disciplinary Proceedings || All. HC: State Government has no Power to Cancel the NOC Granted by PCI || SC: Can’t Allow Revision Petition u/s 115 CPC Against Trail Court Order Rejecting Review of Decree || Mad. HC: Record Statements of Witnesses u/s 161 CrPC Using Electronic Means atleast in Serious Crime || Delhi HC to UGC: Ensure Strict Compliance of UGC Act, 1956, with Regard to Specification of Degree || Mad. HC: Notice Needn’t be Served to Victim in HCP by Accused Following Preventive Detention || SC to Centre/States: Ensure the Effective Implementation of HIV Act, 2017

Report on revitalising PPP model of infrastructure development released- (Ministry of Finance ) (28 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1942/2015

Commercial

A Committee formed to revisit and revitalise the Public Private Partnership Model for infrastructural development has released its Report. PPP, provision of a public asset and service by a private partner who has been granted a ‘Concession’ to do so, has been a mainstay in Indian infrastructure development. The Report expounds the benefits of the PPP model and urges utilising the same to meet the growing infrastructural needs of the country. It also calls for greater oversight and transparency in the process to reduce ‘malafide action’, while also not punishing ‘bonafide intention’.

Tags : PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP TRANSPARENCY INFRASTRUCTURE

Share :