Calcutta HC: Demolition Orders Cannot be Challenged under Article 226 if a Statutory Appeal Exists || Kerala High Court: Disability Pension is Payable to Voluntary Dischargee For Service-Related Illness || Calcutta High Court: Partition Decree is Executable Only After Stamp Duty Payment || Calcutta HC: Contempt Court Cannot Grant New Relief Beyond Original Order Once Compliance is Met || Kerala High Court: Intentional Judicial Decisions Cannot be Altered as Clerical Errors under CPC || Supreme Court: Delay In Filing Appeals under Section 74 of 2013 Land Acquisition Act is Condonable || SC: Statutory Authorities may Intervene When Housing Societies Delay Membership Decisions || SC: Quasi-Judicial Authorities Cannot Exercise Review Powers Unless Expressly Granted By Statute || SC: Special Court Cannot Order Confiscation While Appeal Against Attachment Confirmation is Pending || SC: Photocopies are Not Evidence Unless Conditions for Leading Secondary Evidence are Proved

Report on revitalising PPP model of infrastructure development released- (Ministry of Finance ) (28 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1942/2015

Commercial

A Committee formed to revisit and revitalise the Public Private Partnership Model for infrastructural development has released its Report. PPP, provision of a public asset and service by a private partner who has been granted a ‘Concession’ to do so, has been a mainstay in Indian infrastructure development. The Report expounds the benefits of the PPP model and urges utilising the same to meet the growing infrastructural needs of the country. It also calls for greater oversight and transparency in the process to reduce ‘malafide action’, while also not punishing ‘bonafide intention’.

Tags : PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP TRANSPARENCY INFRASTRUCTURE

Share :