Kerala HC: Physiotherapists and Occupational Therapists Cannot Use “Dr.” Without Medical Degree  ||  Delhi High Court: Law Firms Must Verify Cited Case Laws; Senior Counsel Not Responsible for Finality  ||  MP High Court Dismisses Shah Bano’s Daughter’s Plea, Rules ‘Haq’ Movie is Fiction  ||  Bombay HC Cancels ERC Order, Rules Stakeholders Must Be Heard Before Amending Multi-Year Tariff  ||  Calcutta High Court Rules Dunlop’s Second Appeal Not Maintainable under the Trade Marks Act  ||  Kerala HC: Revisional Power U/S 263 Not Invocable When AO Grants Sec 32AC Deduction After Inquiry  ||  J&K&L HC: Section 359 BNSS Doesn’t Limit High Court’s Inherent Power U/S 528 to Quash FIRs  ||  Bombay HC: BMC Ban on Footpath Cooking via Gas/Grill Doesn’t Apply to Vendors Using Induction  ||  Madras HC: Buyer Not Liable for Seller’s Tax Default; Purchase Tax Can’t Be Imposed under TNGST Act  ||  Kerala HC: Oral Allegations Alone Insufficient to Sustain Bribery Charges Against Ministers    

The Commissioner of Income Tax v. HCL Infosystems Ltd - (High Court of Delhi) (21 Dec 2015)

Terminated venture between HP and HCL not chargeable to capital gains tax

Direct Taxation

The Delhi High Court ruled in favour of HCL Infosystems in a long running tax case arising from termination of a joint venture agreement between HCL and Hewlett Packard. Though it agreed with Department’s assessment that receipt of Rs 60.80 crores by HCL upon termination was a capital receipt, however it could not be charged to capital gains tax because there had existed no such provision at the time of transacting. Amendments to Section 55(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding ‘right to manufacture’ were effected prospectively from 1998, whereas the joint venture between the companies was terminated in 1997.

Relevant : Section 55 Income Tax Act, 1961 Act

Tags : CAPITAL GAINS   JOINT VENTURE   RIGHT TO MANUFACTURE   SECTION 55  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved