Del. HC: Assessing Officer to Decide Whether Case is Fit for Issuance of Notice u/s 148 of IT Act  ||  Delhi HC: Under Arbitration Act, Date of Receipt of Corrected Award Would be Taken as Disposal Date  ||  MP HC: Punishment of Termination of Employee for Single Clerical Mistake ‘Excessive’  ||  Ker. HC: Can Extend Principle of Res Ipsa Loquitur to Criminal Cases Only for Assessment of Evidence  ||  P&H HC: While Adju. Pre-Arrest Bail Plea Manner in Which Accused is Arraigned in FIR is Important  ||  P&H HC: While Adju. Pre-Arrest Bail Plea Manner in Which Accused is Arraigned in FIR is Important  ||  Guj. HC: Can’t Use Nylon Threads, Cotton Threads With Glass Coating for Flying Kites  ||  Tel. HC: Parent Who is Lawful Guardian Taking Child from Custody of Other Parent is Not Kidnapping  ||  Mad. HC: Surplus Funds of Temple Cannot be used to Construct Shopping Complexes  ||  Del. HC: For Filing Additional WS After, Comm. Court Act Doesn't Prevent Appl. of Order 8 Rule 9 CPC    

SC: Pvt Counsel Engaged by Victim Cannot Make Oral Argument or Cross Examine Witnesses - (21 Nov 2019)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has observed that though a victim can engage a private counsel to assist the prosecution such Counsel could not be given the right to make oral arguments or examine and cross examine witnesses. The Court further noted that the victim’s Counsel has a limited right of assisting the prosecution which may extend to suggesting questions to the Court or prosecution but not putting them by himself.

Tags : SC   VICTIM   COUNSEL  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved