Calcutta HC: Demolition Orders Cannot be Challenged under Article 226 if a Statutory Appeal Exists  ||  Kerala High Court: Disability Pension is Payable to Voluntary Dischargee For Service-Related Illness  ||  Calcutta High Court: Partition Decree is Executable Only After Stamp Duty Payment  ||  Calcutta HC: Contempt Court Cannot Grant New Relief Beyond Original Order Once Compliance is Met  ||  Kerala High Court: Intentional Judicial Decisions Cannot be Altered as Clerical Errors under CPC  ||  Supreme Court: Delay In Filing Appeals under Section 74 of 2013 Land Acquisition Act is Condonable  ||  SC: Statutory Authorities may Intervene When Housing Societies Delay Membership Decisions  ||  SC: Quasi-Judicial Authorities Cannot Exercise Review Powers Unless Expressly Granted By Statute  ||  SC: Special Court Cannot Order Confiscation While Appeal Against Attachment Confirmation is Pending  ||  SC: Photocopies are Not Evidence Unless Conditions for Leading Secondary Evidence are Proved    

TRAI releases consultation paper on Issues related to Interconnection Regulation, 2017- (Telecom Regulatory Authority of India) (25 Sep 2019)

MANU/TRAI/0086/2019

Media and Communication

The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has issued the consultation paper on 'Issues related to Interconnection Regulation 2017'. TRAI has received representations from quite a few regional broadcasters wherein they have highlighted their concerns regarding the declaration of the target market by Distributors of television channels (DPOs). The existing regulations provide freedom to the DPOs to declare their target market for the purpose of ascertaining the carriage fee. Some of the distribution platform operators have declared multiple states (or entire country in some cases) as their target market. In such cases these regional broadcasters are required to pay very high carriage fee. Not only does this put undesired financial burden on regional broadcasters, it makes them prone to undue arm twisting by the distributors, as their subscription continues to remain lower than the minimum prescribed threshold of five percent (5%), which is the limit under which a DPO is not mandated to carry any channel.

Further, the placement agreement, marketing agreements or any other technical or commercial arrangements between broadcasters and Distributors (apart from RIO based agreements) are in forbearance. But now, quite a few complaints have been received from various broadcasters whereby it is being alleged that some DPOs are resorting to pushing for marketing/placement/promotion agreement, by exploiting the available forbearance. The objective of this consultation process is to review the provisions of the existing Interconnection Regulation 2017 and consult all the stakeholders on issues related to Target Market and issues related to Placement and other agreements between broadcasters and Distributors.

Tags : CONSULTATION PAPER   RELEASE   INTERCONNECTION REGULATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved