Supreme Court: Air Force Group Insurance Society qualifies as ‘State’ under Article 12 || SC: Anganwadi Workers With Degrees Are Eligible For The 29% Quota For Supervisors in Kerala || SC: Giving Accused the Option of Search Before a Police Officer Breaches Section 50 of the NDPS Act || Gujarat HC: Person is Entitled to Compensation For Injury or Death Within Railway Station Premises || Delhi HC: PMLA Can Apply Even if the Scheduled Offence Occurred Before the Law Came Into Force || J&K&L HC: Accused Can Admit Evidence Recorded under Section 299 Crpc After Appearing in Court || J&K&L HC: District Judge Serving as Reference Court under Land Acquisition Act Acts as a Civil Court || Del HC: Subsequent Bail Pleas From Same FIR Should Usually Go Before the Judge Who Denied the First || J&K&L HC: Vaishno Devi Shrine Board, Despite Statutory Status, is Not a ‘State’ under Article 12 || SC: Confirmation of an Auction Sale Does Not Bar Judicial Scrutiny of Reserve Price Valuation

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :