Supreme Court: Foreign Judgment Unenforceable in India Without Fair Opportunity to Defend || Supreme Court: High Court Cannot Decide Appeal Pending Before Statutory Authority Due to Delay || Supreme Court: SDO Lacks Authority to Change Land Classification under UP Zamindari Abolition Act || Supreme Court: Man Not Liable For Maintenance if DNA Test Proves He is Not the Child’s Father || SC: Prison Must Not Dilute Rights of Disabled Inmates; Oversight Given to High-Powered Panel || Delhi High Court: Judges Would Have to Recuse if Children as Central Govt Counsel is Treated as Bias || Delhi HC: Fresh Tenders Allowed Despite Existing Contracts; Anticipatory Grievances Not Entertained || Delhi High Court: Judges Cannot Respond Publicly; Criticism Must Be Responsible and Evidence-Based || J&K&L High Court: IO Not Bound By FIR; Can Modify Offences in Final Chargesheet U/S 173 CrPC || Supreme Court: Brief Service Breaks Do Not Bar Ad Hoc Employees From Regularisation

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :