SC: POCSO Guilt Presumption Not Absolute, Acquits Accused || Supreme Court: Promotion Cannot Be Claimed as a Vested Right under Repealed Rules || Supreme Court: Promotion Cannot Be Claimed as a Vested Right under Repealed Rules || SC: Unexplained 5-Day Sample Custody Gap Breached S.52A, Acquits 2 after 20 Years || P&H High Court: Illegal Search Alone Does Not Justify Quashing of Complaint under PNDT Act || Bom HC: Creating WhatsApp Group Without Employer's Permission Not Ground for Compulsory Retirement || Madras HC: Lack of Son’s Moral Support Alone Cannot Sustain Father’s Maintenance Claim under CrPC || Kerala HC: University Professor doesn't Occupy 'Public Office', Quo Warranto Not Maintainable || Bombay HC Allows Cutting of 1,237 Mangroves for Connector Bridge in Mumbai’s Western Suburbs || Calcutta HC Orders Return of 3-Year-Old to Adoptive Couple, he wasn't Abandoned

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :