Supreme Court: Right to a Speedy Trial Cannot Override NDPS Act Bail Conditions || SC: Relatives Cannot be Implicated in Bigamy Solely Based on Knowledge of a Second Marriage || Supreme Court: Service Inam Land Attached to a Mosque Constitutes Waqf Property and is Inalienable || Supreme Court: Court Cannot Order an Accused to Surrender While Denying Anticipatory Bail || Supreme Court: Landlord’s Legal Heirs May Amend an Eviction Suit to Include Bona Fide Need || Supreme Court: Unsuccessful Party Can Invoke Section 9 of the Arbitration Act Even After an Award || Karnataka High Court: Accused Cannot be Required to Share Live GPS Location as a Condition of Bail || Guj HC: Plaintiff in Specific Performance Suit Must Prove Readiness &Willingness to Perform Contract || Madras HC: Transgenders are Children of God, Tragedy Lies in Society’s Blindness, Not Their Birth || Del HC: False Educational Qualification Declaration does not amount to Corrupt Practice U/S 123(4)

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :