SC: Absence of Independent Witnesses is Not Fatal if Injured Eyewitness Testimony is Sterling || Supreme Court: Prosthetic Limb Costs Must Be Compensated To Restore Victims’ Dignity || Supreme Court: Probate Can be Revoked For Non-Impleadment of Parties and Suppression of Facts || SC: Plaint Cannot be Rejected For Valuation or Court Fee Defects Without Chance to Rectify || SC Rules Government Grants Act Overrides Rent Law, Sets Aside Eviction Proceeding Against Union Govt || SC: Civil Court Has No Jurisdiction in Boundary Dispute Between Maharashtra Panchayat & Municipality || Allahabad HC: Two Criminal Cases Insufficient to Label a Person as 'Goonda' and Harm Reputation || Bom HC: Sprinkling Mustard Without Ill Intent Before a House is Not an Offence under Black Magic Act || J&K&L HC: Preventive Detention Invalid When Based on Speculative Fear of Election Disturbance || Bombay High Court: POSH Act Penalises False Complaints by Women But Not Those Who Instigate Them

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :