SC: Appeal U/S 374 CrPC/415 BNSS is Not Maintainable Against Sessions Court's Reversal of Acquittal || SC Asked the Centre to Promote Awareness About the Consequences of Driving With an Expired Licence || SC Explains How a Deceased Christian Wife's Property Devolves under the Indian Succession Act || Supreme Court: Reach Stacker isn't a Motor Vehicle; MACT Claim Not Maintainable || Supreme Court: Lift Makers, Operators and Owners Share Responsibility for User Safety || Patna HC: Pressure to Sign Divorce and Child Custody does not Amount to Cruelty || Bombay HC: Externment under the Police Act Requires Satisfaction About a Gang's Activities || Bombay HC: False Travel Distance Claim Alone Doesn't Constitute Misappropriation || J&K&L High Court: Interest on Delayed Gratuity is Not a Mandatory Pre-Deposit For an Appeal || Meghalaya HC: Meritorious Candidate Cannot Be Denied Admission For a Two-Minute Delay

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :