Supreme Court Explains that Comprehensive Motor Insurance Covers Occupants of a Vehicle || Supreme Court: Judgments Operate Retrospectively Unless Made Prospective || Supreme Court Clarifies Principles Governing Witness Recall under Order 18 Rule 17 of CPC || Gujarat High Court: Res Judicata Prevents Trustees from Reopening Trust Property Disputes || Allahabad HC: Trial Courts Cannot Examine Witnesses to Generate Fresh Evidence Before Cognizance || Rajasthan HC: Funds Collected From an Illegal Toll Plaza Must Be Used For Tree Plantation || Delhi HC: Minor’s Signature Alone Cannot Establish Consent for Pregnancy Termination || Karnataka HC Allows ECIR Challenge under Article 226, Rejects ED’s Immunity Claim || Allahabad High Court Upholds Transfer of a Dissolved Society's Assets to its Successor Company || P&H HC: Cheque Bounce Cases Remain Compoundable Even After Appellate Courts Uphold Conviction

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :