Allahabad HC Reduces Cop's Sentence in 1984 Attempt-to-Murder Case, Awards Rs. 35,000 to Victim || Delhi High Court: Copyright Owners and ISPs Cannot Unilaterally Declare a Website 'Rogue' || Rajasthan HC: Teacher's Reprimand for Poor Attendance and Performance is Not Abetment of Suicide || Karnataka High Court: Police Assistance to Enforce Injunction Not Barred by Res Judicata || SC Upholds Validity of Section 16(2)(c) of CGST Act, Says ITC Depends on Supplier's Tax Payment || Supreme Court: Registration Certificate Alone Can't Secure Interim Release of Seized Vehicles || Supreme Court: IBC Moratorium Doesn't Shield Promoters, Directors From Consumer Complaints || Supreme Court: Accused Person's Advocate Cannot Remain Present During Entire Police Interrogation || Uttarakhand HC: Severity of POCSO Charges Alone Cannot Deny Juvenile Bail || Madras HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Man Accused of Watching CM Vijay's Unreleased Film Online

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :