Kerala High Court: ED Can Investigate Without FIR in Scheduled Offence Cases (CMRL Matter) || Delhi High Court Upholds TRAI Rule Capping TV Advertisements at 12 Minutes Per Hour || Supreme Court Directs High Courts to Deliver Judgments in 3 Months and Bail Orders in One Day || Supreme Court: Successful Resolution Applicant Cannot Negotiate Further After CoC Approval || Supreme Court: Succession Law Applies, Not Primogeniture, to Ex-Royal’s Private Estate Inheritance || Supreme Court: Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Challenge Arbitrator’s Section 16 Decision || Supreme Court: Sanyasi Status Cannot Be Ground to Reject Land Compensation Claim || Supreme Court: Section 33(1)(a) of Arbitration Act Cannot Alter Nature of Interest in Award || Supreme Court: Society Office Bearers Not Liable for Cheque Dishonour Without Active Business Role || Supreme Court: Asking a Woman to Adjust in Marriage Does Not Amount to Cruelty By In-Laws

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :