Supreme Court: Brief Service Breaks Do Not Bar Ad Hoc Employees From Regularisation || SC: Arbitral Awards May Be Challenged By Legal Representatives Only U/S 34, Not Via Article 227 || SC Stressed Caution in Uniformed Service Appointments and Restored Dismissal of an Unfit Constable || Supreme Court: Higher Qualifications Cannot Replace the Required Minimum Experience Criteria || Delhi High Court: Bank's Guard Post Involves Handling Arms, Strict Background Disclosure is Essential || Delhi High Court: CARA Must Obtain Foreign Clearances Before Issuing NOC For Inter-Country Adoption || Punjab & Haryana HC: Grounds of Arrest Need Not Be Reissued For a Second Arrest in the Same FIR || Chhattisgarh HC: Valid Caste Certificate Required To Prove SC/ST Act Offences; Oral Claim Not Enough || Supreme Court Directs Preventive Detention to Curb Illegal Mining in Chambal Sanctuary || SC: Courts Must Frame Points For Determination and Give Reasoned Judgments in Ex Parte Cases

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :