Supreme Court: Bail Remains the Rule and Jail the Exception, Even under the UAPA Law || Supreme Court: Principle of Res Judicata Also Applies Between Stages of the Same Case || Supreme Court: Govt Servant Has No Right to Old Rule Promotion Just Due to Earlier Vacancies || Delhi High Court: Students Having Zero Attendance Cannot be Promoted to the Next Semester || J&K&L HC: Replacing 'State' With 'Union Territory' in Public Safety Act Does Not Change its Nature || Kerala High Court: Doctor Cannot Enrol as an Advocate Without First Cancelling Medical Registration || Supreme Court: VAT is Not Applicable on Reliance’s Inter-State Gas Supply from KG Basin to UP || Supreme Court: Co-Owner Can File Eviction Suit as Landlord under Bombay Rent Act || Supreme Court: Mediclaim Reimbursement Cannot be Set off Against Accident Compensation || SC: Hindu Succession Act 2005 Amendment Does Not Curtail Daughters’ Existing Inheritance Rights

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :