SC: Consumers Cannot Bear Power Plant Depreciation Costs When No Electricity Was Supplied || Supreme Court: Para-Teachers’ Regularisation Depends On Educational Standards Set By States || Bombay High Court: State Cannot Withhold Aid to Child Homes While Supporting Ladki Bahin Yojana || Delhi High Court: Husband Cannot Seek to Strike off Wife’s Defence over Unpaid Litigation Costs || Calcutta HC: Bank Accounts Cannot Be Frozen Solely on Complaints Filed Via MHA Cybercrime Portal || J&K&L HC: Unregistered Agreement to Sell Can be Considered For Assessing Possession at Interim Stage || Raj HC: Cybercrime Cases Can't be Quashed Only on Compromise as They Impact Society at Large || Gujarat High Court: Separate Compensation is Payable For Stillborn Child in Railway Accident Case || Delhi HC: Hymen Rupture is Not Required to Prove Penetrative Sexual Assault under the POCSO Act || Delhi HC: Organised Crime Groups Exploit Juveniles, Misuse Juvenile Justice Laws for Serious Crimes

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :