Supreme Court: Uncrystallized Contractual Damages Not an Operational Debt under Section 9 IBC || Supreme Court: Interest Accrued in Suspense Account After NPA Classification is Recoverable as Debt || Supreme Court: S.69 GST Arrest Order with “Reasons to Believe” Must Precede Arrest || Supreme Court: Winding-Up Proceedings Period Cannot be Excluded under Section 14 Limitation Act || Supreme Court: Separate Appeals Unnecessary Against Common Judgment on Suit and Counterclaim || Supreme Court: Unsuccessful Party Can Seek Post-Award Section 9 Relief in Exceptional Cases || Delhi HC Rejects Black Money Act Challenge, Imposes Rs. 60,000 Costs over Prosecution Avoidance || Delhi HC Affirms Teacher's POCSO Conviction, Urges Schools to Encourage Children to Speak Up || Kerala HC: NGO Funding Peaceful Protests Can't Justify FCRA Renewal Denial || Delhi HC: Courts Cannot Judge Sufficiency of Material For Issuing Look Out Circular

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :