Supreme Court: SC/ST Act Does Not Apply to Alleged Casteist Abuse Inside a Private House || Supreme Court: Frictionless Relationship Between the Bar and the Bench Strengthens Justice Delivery || Delhi High Court: Eviction From Jhuggis With Rehabilitation Does Not Violate Article 21 || Madras HC: Courts Cannot Remain Silent When Single Disputed Vote Could Determine Government’s Fate || Allahabad HC Blamed State and Police For Delays and Ordered Reforms to Tackle “Tarikh Pe Tarikh” || Supreme Court: Banks Cannot Invoke IBC Against Debtors For Builder-Linked Loans || Supreme Court: Non-Disclosure of Failed Candidates’ Marks Does Not Imply They Passed Exams || Supreme Court: Murder Accused Cannot Inherit Property of the Person Allegedly Killed || Supreme Court: Delay in Deposit Does Not Automatically Cancel Contracts under Specific Relief Act || SC: Railways is Treated as a Consumer under the Electricity Act, Not a Distribution Licensee

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :