P&H High Court: Re-Investigation Cannot Nullify Existing Acquittal Despite Breach of Stay Order || Gujarat HC: Illegal Mining Vehicle Complaints Must Be Filed Before Sessions Court, Not Magistrate || Delhi High Court Lays Down Registry Directions for Dealing with Insufficiently Stamped Arbitral Award || Delhi High Court: Victims Need No Leave to Appeal Acquittal or Conviction for Lesser Offence || SC: Limitation Act Inapplicable to Revisions under Karnataka Land Revenue Act || SC: Banks Can Invoke SARFAESI for Loans Acquired from NBFCs Outside the Act || SC: Gujarat Prohibition Act Does not Bar Interim Seized Vehicle Release || Supreme Court Quashes Rs. 425-Crore Customs Penalty Based on AI-Generated Fake Case Laws || SC: Guilt cannot be Presumed Solely Due to Collusion Allegations against Investigating Officer || SC: Clarificatory Statement Does Not Constitute a Binding Undertaking for Contempt Proceedings

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :