Supreme Court Upholds Conviction as Husband Failed to Explain Wife’s Death in Matrimonial Home || Supreme Court: Crime Scene Re-Enactment Does Not Always Violate Right Against Self-Incrimination || Supreme Court: Cognizance Taken Without Hearing Accused under BNSS Section 223 is Void Ab Initio || Supreme Court Upholds Will in Sister’s Favour, Says Excluding Natural Heirs is Not Suspicious || Delhi HC: Absence of Public Witnesses and Videography in NDPS Recovery Relevant for Bail Decisions || Raj HC Initiates Suo Motu Cognizance Over Severe Water Crisis in Jodhpur, Issues Interim Directions || Del HC: Courts Cannot Direct, Monitor Inquiry Into Police Delay in Investigation After Bail Decision || Supreme Court: After the BNSS, a Pre-Cognizance Hearing is Mandatory in PMLA Cases || SC: Landowners Cannot be Forced to Waive Statutory Compensation to Claim Other Benefits || Supreme Court: Banks are Lenient With Big Borrowers But Strict With Ordinary Loan Applicants

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :