SC: Tamil Nadu Governor’s Act of Withholding Assent for 10 Bills is Illegal and Erroneous || Wikimedia Moves Delhi HC against Order Directing it to Remove Defamatory Content of ANI || Rajasthan HC: Re-Evaluation Result Would Not Relate Back to the Date of Original Declaration of Resul || Delhi High Court Directs Maintenance of Status Quo on Construction inside Kalan Masjid || Delhi HC: Can’t Appreciate Delhi Govt.’s Callousness in Filling up DCPCR Vacancies || SC to Decide if Term 'Regulate' in Electricity Act Covers Trade Regulation in Electricity Industry || SC Expresses Displeasure at Instances of UP Police Turning Civil Disputes Being into Criminal Dispute || SC: Action of Public Officer in Excess of Authority Would Attract Protection if Reasonable Nexus Show || Supreme Court: Principle of Res Judicata Applies to Quasi-Judicial Proceedings || SC: No Provision Under Registration Act, 1908 Allows Authority to Ascertain if Vendor has Title

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :