Delhi HC: Property Disputes Between In-Laws and Daughter-In-Law are Not Exclusively For Family Court || Delhi High Court: After Probate is Granted, A Will Does Not Require Fresh Proof under Section 68 || Ker HC: Periodic Replacement and Maintenance of Prosthetic Limb Must Be Included in Compensation || Madras High Court: DNA Test Not Required For Mother to Donate Kidney to Her Son || Delhi HC: Pre-Summoning Evidence Opportunity Must be Granted Even in Civil-Natured Criminal Cases || J&K&L HC: UAPA Trials Cannot Linger and Must Proceed With Day-To-Day Hearing under NIA Act || Allahabad HC: FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Not Vitiated For Lack of Pre-Registration Hearing || Allahabad HC: FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Not Vitiated For Lack of Pre-Registration Hearing || Delhi HC: Private Schools May Increase Fees Without Prior Approval if Declared Before Session Begins || Supreme Court: Omission of Accused in Inquest Report Alone Does Not Indicate Innocence

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :