NCLAT Sets Aside Insolvency, Imposes ?10L Costs Following Recusal over Attempt to Influence Member || J&K&L HC: Sec 195 CrPC Bars Cognizance Without Public Servant's Complaint, Not FIR or Investigation || Allahabad HC: Preliminary Issues Barred if Raised 18 Years After Issues Were Framed in a Suit || Guj HC: No Prior Hearing Needed to Dismiss Cop After Corruption Conviction under Article 311(2)(A) || Madras HC: Senior Citizens Act Applies Only To Post-2007 Property Transfers, Not Retrospective || Supreme Court: Private Insurer Not Liable For Accident by Vehicle under State Requisition || SC: Reserved Candidates Can Claim General Seats on Merit with Relaxation if Rules Allow || SC: No Vested Right to Appointment For Next Candidate if Selected One Doesn't Join || Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award, Rules State Cannot Be Judge in its Own Dispute Case || Delhi HC: Girl Being Friendly on Valentine’s Day Does Not Justify Forced Sexual Activity under POCSO

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :