Supreme Court Rebukes RBI for Remaining a Bystander as YES Bank Operated Clandestinely || Supreme Court: Lower Fresh Bids Alone Cannot Justify Cancellation of an Auction || Supreme Court Directs Delhi Police to Produce Section 163 BNSS Orders and Preserve CCTV Footage || Supreme Court Affirms Menstrual Hygiene as a Fundamental Right, Warns States of Contempt || Supreme Court Flags AI-Generated Fake Judgments Submitted in a Party’s Case Compilation || Karnataka High Court: Vijay Mallya’s Flamboyant Lifestyle Hinders Settlement of Bank Claims || Delhi High Court: Women can be Booked for Gang Rape without Physically Committing it || Delhi High Court: Litigants Must Track Their Cases and Cannot Blame Lawyers for Their Own Inaction || Allahabad High Court: Contract Workers Must Prove Work Parity With Regular Staff for Equal Pay || Allahabad High Court Directs UP Trial Courts to Decide Maintenance Execution Cases Within Six Months

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :