SC: CIRP Need Not Be Set Aside Solely for Fraudulent Filing of Section 9 Plea || Supreme Court: Compromise Decree Passed Without Impleading Necessary Party is Void || SC: Cheque Dishonour Notice Valid if Sent to Drawer’s Address and Received by Family || J&K&L HC: Minority During Attestation Cannot Justify Decades-Long Delay in Challenging Mutation || Bombay HC: WhatsApp Circulation of Objectionable Photos Can Attract SC/ST Act || J&K&L HC: Cardiac Arrest From Stress of Long-Distance Driving is Compensable || Delhi HC: Accused Cannot Delay Trial and Then Rely on Delay to Seek Bail || Calcutta HC: Insurer Must Compensate Child’s Accidental Death Despite Driver’s Fake Licence || Bombay HC Tells X to Take Down Defamatory Post Targeting Serum Institute, CEO Adar Poonawalla || Delhi High Court Restores Arbitral Award in DMRC’s Favour Passed by Employee-Arbitrator

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :