SC: Revisional Jurisdiction Cannot Correct Factual Errors Despite Alleged Concealment || Supreme Court: Wrong Statement in Pleadings is Not Always a False Statement, Perjury Case Quashed || SC: Under JJ Act, Murder Falls Within Heinous Offences; S. 302 IPC Prescribes Minimum Life Sentence || Supreme Court: Cognisance of FERA Complaint is Invalid Without Prior Notice to the Accused || Supreme Court: Terror Cases Cannot Curtail Constitutional Safeguards and the Right to Fair Trial || Supreme Court: Terror Cases Cannot Curtail Constitutional Safeguards and the Right to Fair Trial || SC Upheld Husband's Conviction For Murdering His Wife over an Extramarital Affair || J&K&L High Court: Mere Admission of Issuing Cheque is Not a Plea of Guilt under S.138 NI Act || Calcutta HC: Aadhaar Card Prima Facie Establishes Occupation; Demolition Without Notice is Unlawful || Gauhati High Court: Wildlife Law Doesn't Bar Trade in Unprotected Ornamental Fish Species

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :