SC: Magistrates Should Not Record Prosecution Evidence in Sessions-Triable Cases || Supreme Court Lays Down Guidelines on Using ITRs to Assess Motor Accident Victims' Income || Supreme Court: Citing AI-Generated Fake Precedents Amounts to Advocate Misconduct || Bombay HC: Horse-Trading Rampant in Maharashtra, FIRs 'Washed' After Switching Sides || Tripura High Court: Senior Citizens Cannot be Penalised For Failing to Follow Cases Online || Delhi High Court: Parent Cannot Gain Advantage by Keeping a Child Against a Foreign Court Order || Allahabad HC: Places of Worship Act Bars Conversion of Religious Character, Not State Acquisition || Jharkhand HC: Single Instance of Mother-In-Law Abusing Daughter-In-Law Does Not Amount to Cruelty || Madras High Court: No Appeal Lies Against E-Court Status or Adjournment Orders || Chhattisgarh HC: Judicial Officer Promotion Cannot be Denied on Complaint Without Disciplinary Action

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :