Supreme Court: Breach of Contract is Not Cheating Unless Fraud Existed From the Outset || Supreme Court: Specific Performance of an Agreement to Sell May be Denied After a Long Delay || Supreme Court: Section 498A IPC Applies to Live-In Relationships in Nature of Marriage || Supreme Court Awards Rs.83.38 Lakh to Child Left Paralysed, Stressing Impact on the Victim’s Future || J&K and Ladakh High Court: Private Trust Cannot Oppose Wakf Takeover Without Legal Authority || P&H HC: Courts Cannot Grant Protection to a Minor’s Live-In Relationship Prohibited By Law || Chhattisgarh High Court: NEET OMR Tampering Allegations Cannot Rest on Mere Suspicion || Allahabad High Court Upholds Conviction, Says a Reliable Dying Declaration Alone Can Sustain Guilt || Bombay HC Criticises ITAT for Delays in Pronouncing Orders Beyond 90-Day Limit || P&H High Court Criticises Punjab For Spending on Freebies and Ads While Delaying Employee Dues

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :