Supreme Court: Driving Licence Renewal After a Gap Will Not Take Effect From Expiry Date || Supreme Court: High Courts Cannot Quash Cheque Bounce Cases by Pre-Trial Inquiry Into Liability || Supreme Court: Passport Renewal Cannot be Denied if Trial Court Has Permitted it Despite Pending Case || SC: Delay in Depositing Sale Balance Does not Make Specific Performance Decree Inexecutable || Supreme Court: Non-Compete Fees Qualify as Deductible Revenue Expenditure under Income Tax Act || Supreme Court: Section 311 CrPC Should be Invoked Sparingly, Only When Evidence is Vital || J&K&L High Court: Successive Bail Applications Can Be Filed Even Without Change in Circumstances || Kerala HC: Fresh Arbitration Notice is Required For Second Arbitration After Prior Award Set Aside || NCLT Hyderabad: Mortgaging Property Without Lending Money Does Not Constitute Financial Debt || Supreme Court: Vacancies From Resignations under CUSAT Act Must Follow Communal Rotation

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :