Supreme Court: IBC Mechanism Cannot Replace Decree Execution or Recovery Proceedings || SC Orders Closure of School Over Loan Default, Directs Police-Assisted Takeover under SARFAESI Act || MP HC: HC Lacks Jurisdiction to Appoint an Arbitrator in International Commercial Disputes || Allahabad HC Imposes Rs 15L Costs on Husband For Filing False Affidavits in Maintenance Proceedings || MP HC Directs ASI to Upload Bhojshala–Kamal Maula Survey Video on Secure Platform For Litigant || Bombay HC: Public Gathering Does Not Justify Handcuffing, Awarded ?50,000 Compensation || Madras HC: Woman’s Dignity Linked to Right to Shelter; Orders Restoration of Demolished Home || SC: Absence of Independent Witnesses is Not Fatal if Injured Eyewitness Testimony is Sterling || Supreme Court: Prosthetic Limb Costs Must Be Compensated To Restore Victims’ Dignity || Supreme Court: Probate Can be Revoked For Non-Impleadment of Parties and Suppression of Facts

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :