Supreme Court: Joint Disciplinary Proceedings Not Mandatory in Cases Involving Multiple Officers || Supreme Court: Transferred Students Cannot Claim Government Fees After College Loses Recognition || Supreme Court: Arbitration Clause Applies When Earlier Agreement is Imported “Body and Soul” || J&K&L High Court: Seasonal Labourers Cannot Be Regularised Amid Government’s Blanket Ban || Delhi High Court: Silence Amid Sustained Vilification May Undermine Public Confidence In Judiciary || Calcutta HC Stays Eastern Railway Eviction Drive Affecting Around 6,000 Slum Dwellers Near Station || J&K&L HC: Repeated Arrests U/S 107 Crpc After UAPA Bail Can be Fresh PSA Detention Grounds || Del HC: Arrest Memo Listing Only Reasons Cannot Substitute Person-Specific Grounds of Arrest || SC: Hostile Witness Testimony Can Support Acquittal as Well, Not Only Conviction || SC: Appointing Candidates on Contract Against Advertised Regular Posts is Patently Illegal

Rules regarding quoting of PAN for specified transactions amended - (15 Dec 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1806/2015

Direct Taxation

To bring a balance between burden of compliance on legitimate transactions and the need to capture information relating to transactions of higher value, the Government has enhanced the monetary limits of certain transactions which require quoting of Permanent Account Number. Some of the raised monetary limits are Rs. 10 lakh from Rs. 5 lakh for sale or purchase of immovable property; Rs.50,000 from Rs. 25,000 in the case of hotel or restaurant bills paid at any one time; and to Rs. 1 lakh from Rs. 50,000 for purchase or sale of shares of an unlisted company.

Tags : PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER BLACK MONEY TRANSACTIONS

Share :