NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC  ||  SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation  ||  SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job  ||  NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights  ||  NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation  ||  Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation  ||  Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices  ||  Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear    

Foale v. The State of Western Australia - (22 Aug 2019)

Court can refuse bail pending sentence where Applicant has been convicted of a serious offence that is very likely to result in a sentence of immediate imprisonment for a significant term

Criminal

The Applicant is a 33 year old man who was found guilty for possession of methylamphetamine with intent to sell or supply, contrary to Section 6(1)(a) of the Misuse of Drugs Act, 1981. The learned trial judge, Birmingham DCJ, adjourned sentencing until 9 August 2019. By his counsel, the applicant applied for bail pending sentencing. The learned trial judge refused the application and the applicant has made an application to this court. The learned trial judge said that the applicant's release on bail pending sentence would be 'wholly inappropriate'

The need to arrange one's affairs before serving a term of immediate imprisonment, as well as the difficulties associated with the preparation of an appeal from prison, are common to all persons who are being held in custody awaiting the disposition of an appeal. Further, the facts about the applicant's previous good character and the unlikelihood of his absconding, cannot, on their own, constitute such circumstances. These, too, are not exceptional. In some cases the strength of an appellant's case may go some way towards establishing exceptional circumstances but, as counsel for the respondent has pointed out, in this application there is no material upon which the court could make any assessment of that kind.

In a case in which the applicant has been convicted of a serious offence that is very likely to result in a sentence of immediate imprisonment for a significant term, as in this case, that fact alone will generally justify a refusal of bail pending sentence.

The low risk of offending that, the applicant seems to present, as well as the undoubted inconvenience that immediate imprisonment will cause to the applicant's preparation of his appeal, could not outweigh the other factors, namely the convictions for serious offences and the imminence of the sentence of immediate imprisonment. Application dismissed.

Tags : SERIOUS OFFENCES   BAIL   GRANT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved