P&H HC: Eyewitness Account Not Credible if Eyewitness Directly Identifies Accused in Court  ||  Delhi HC: Conditions u/s 45 PMLA Have to Give Way to Article 21 When Accused Incarcerated for Long  ||  Delhi High Court: Delhi Police to Add Grounds of Arrest in Arrest Memo  ||  Kerala High Court: Giving Seniority on the Basis of Rules is a Policy Decision  ||  Del. HC: Where Arbitrator has Taken Plausible View, Court Cannot Interfere u/s 34 of A&C Act  ||  Ker. HC: No Question of Estoppel Against Party Where Error is Committed by Court Itself  ||  Supreme Court: Revenue Entries are Admissible as Evidence of Possession  ||  SC: Mere Breakup of Relationship Between Consenting Couple Can’t Result in Criminal Proceedings  ||  SC: Bar u/s 195 CrPC Not Attracted Where Proceedings Initiated Pursuant to Judicial Order  ||  NTF Gives Comprehensive Suggestions on Enhancing Better Working Conditions of Medical Professions    

Foale v. The State of Western Australia - (22 Aug 2019)

Court can refuse bail pending sentence where Applicant has been convicted of a serious offence that is very likely to result in a sentence of immediate imprisonment for a significant term

Criminal

The Applicant is a 33 year old man who was found guilty for possession of methylamphetamine with intent to sell or supply, contrary to Section 6(1)(a) of the Misuse of Drugs Act, 1981. The learned trial judge, Birmingham DCJ, adjourned sentencing until 9 August 2019. By his counsel, the applicant applied for bail pending sentencing. The learned trial judge refused the application and the applicant has made an application to this court. The learned trial judge said that the applicant's release on bail pending sentence would be 'wholly inappropriate'

The need to arrange one's affairs before serving a term of immediate imprisonment, as well as the difficulties associated with the preparation of an appeal from prison, are common to all persons who are being held in custody awaiting the disposition of an appeal. Further, the facts about the applicant's previous good character and the unlikelihood of his absconding, cannot, on their own, constitute such circumstances. These, too, are not exceptional. In some cases the strength of an appellant's case may go some way towards establishing exceptional circumstances but, as counsel for the respondent has pointed out, in this application there is no material upon which the court could make any assessment of that kind.

In a case in which the applicant has been convicted of a serious offence that is very likely to result in a sentence of immediate imprisonment for a significant term, as in this case, that fact alone will generally justify a refusal of bail pending sentence.

The low risk of offending that, the applicant seems to present, as well as the undoubted inconvenience that immediate imprisonment will cause to the applicant's preparation of his appeal, could not outweigh the other factors, namely the convictions for serious offences and the imminence of the sentence of immediate imprisonment. Application dismissed.

Tags : SERIOUS OFFENCES   BAIL   GRANT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved