Calcutta HC: Award May Be Set Aside if Tribunal Rewrites Contract or Ignores Key Clauses  ||  Delhi HC Suspends Kuldeep Singh Sengar’s Life Term, Holding Section 5(C) of POCSO Not Made Out  ||  Calcutta High Court: Arbitration Clause in an Expired Lease Cannot be Invoked For a Fresh Lease  ||  Delhi High Court: 120-Day Timeline under Section 132B Of Income Tax Act is Not Mandatory  ||  NCLAT Reaffirms That Borrower's Debt Acknowledgment Also Extends Limitation Period for Guarantors  ||  NCLAT: Oppression & Mismanagement Petition Cannot Be Filed Without Company Membership on Filing Date  ||  Supreme Court Quashes Rajasthan Village Renaming, Says Government Must Follow its Own Policy  ||  NCLAT: NCLT Can Order Forensic Audit on its Own, No Separate Application Required  ||  NCLAT Reiterates That IBC Cannot be Invoked as a Recovery Tool for Contractual Disputes  ||  Delhi HC: DRI or Central Revenues Control Lab Presence in Delhi Alone Does Not Confer Jurisdiction    

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. The Station House Officer and Ors. - (High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for Telangana and Andhra Pradesh) (28 Jul 2015)

Courts should render all aid to the aggrieved party to enable him to derive the full benefits of the order

MANU/AP/0388/2015

Banking

The High Court held that the jurisdiction of the Civil Court did not need to be invoked in order to enforce its order. In a matter where Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited, had failed to comply with a court order to hand over possession of property to the Petitioner, Kotak Mahindra Bank, the Court directed the police to provide 'necessary assistance' to the Petitioners 'in taking absolute and exclusive control' of the property. It qualified, for a person to approach the Court seeking police intervention where possession was not clearly established in legal proceedings would constitute an abuse of process.

Relevant : South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. vs. State of M.P. and Ors. MANU/SC/0807/2003 Midnapore Peoples Coop. Bank Ltd. v. Chunilal Nanda MANU/SC/2810/2006 Rayapati Audemma vs. Pothineni Narasimham MANU/AP/0117/1971 P.R. Murlidharan and Ors. vs. Swami Dharmananda Theertha Padar and Ors. MANU/SC/1380/2006

Tags : SARFAESI   POLICE   ENFORCE   ORDER   POSSESSION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved