Supreme Court: Award Valid Even If Passed After Mandate Expiry When Court Extends Time  ||  Jharkhand HC: Regular Bail Plea During Interim Bail is Not Maintainable under Section 483 BNSS  ||  Cal HC: Theft Claims and Public Humiliation Alone Don’t Amount To Abetment of Suicide U/S 306 IPC  ||  Delhi High Court: Elective Surgery Does Not Bar Grant of Interim Bail on Medical Grounds  ||  Delhi HC: Consensual Romance With Minor Nearing 18 May be Considered For Bail in POCSO Case  ||  Delhi HC: Not Named In FIR Doesn’t Matter If Financial Links Show Active Role in NDPS Offence  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Rape is an Affront to Womanhood and a Brutal Violation of The Right To Life  ||  Supreme Court: Single Insolvency Petition Maintainable Against Linked Corporate Entities  ||  Supreme Court: Disputes are Not Arbitrable When the Arbitration Agreement is Alleged to be Forged  ||  Supreme Court: Temple Trust Does Not Qualify as an ‘Industry’ under the Industrial Disputes Act    

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. The Station House Officer and Ors. - (High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for Telangana and Andhra Pradesh) (28 Jul 2015)

Courts should render all aid to the aggrieved party to enable him to derive the full benefits of the order

MANU/AP/0388/2015

Banking

The High Court held that the jurisdiction of the Civil Court did not need to be invoked in order to enforce its order. In a matter where Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited, had failed to comply with a court order to hand over possession of property to the Petitioner, Kotak Mahindra Bank, the Court directed the police to provide 'necessary assistance' to the Petitioners 'in taking absolute and exclusive control' of the property. It qualified, for a person to approach the Court seeking police intervention where possession was not clearly established in legal proceedings would constitute an abuse of process.

Relevant : South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. vs. State of M.P. and Ors. MANU/SC/0807/2003 Midnapore Peoples Coop. Bank Ltd. v. Chunilal Nanda MANU/SC/2810/2006 Rayapati Audemma vs. Pothineni Narasimham MANU/AP/0117/1971 P.R. Murlidharan and Ors. vs. Swami Dharmananda Theertha Padar and Ors. MANU/SC/1380/2006

Tags : SARFAESI   POLICE   ENFORCE   ORDER   POSSESSION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved