Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order  ||  Supreme Court: Certiorari Can Quash a Tribunal Decision That is Grossly Perverse  ||  Supreme Court: Informant’s Consent is Not Required to Quash a Case Settled With the Victim  ||  Madras High Court: False Posts Against a Minister are Not an Offence Without Intent to Cause Alarm  ||  Delhi High Court: Police Cannot Pick and Choose Among Accused Persons for Arrest  ||  J&K High Court: Bar Associations are Not ‘State’ under Article 12 and are Outside Writ Jurisdiction  ||  Calcutta High Court: Third Parties Can Challenge Inaction Against Unauthorised Construction  ||  Madras High Court: Being an Advocate Does Not Mean a Person Cannot Commit an Offence  ||  Delhi High Court: Husband Cannot Reopen Settled Marital Disputes to Avoid Maintenance Liability  ||  Calcutta High Court: State Cannot Deny CRMI Seats to Foreign Medical Graduates Citing Stipend Costs    

Pakistan Breached Vienna Convention on Consular Access Rules ICJ - (17 Jul 2019)

Criminal

The International Court of Justice (ICJ), the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, on 17th July, 2019, rendered its Judgment in the Jadhav case (India v. Pakistan). The Court accepted India’s submission and held against Pakistan. The Court finds by fifteen votes to one that, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, in the matter of the detention and trial of an Indian national, Mr. Kulbhushan Sudhir Jadhav, has acted in breach of the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations of 24th April, 1963 (Vienna Convention).

The Court finds unanimously, that it has jurisdiction, on the basis of Article I of the Optional Protocol concerning the Compulsory Settlement of Disputes to the Vienna Convention, to entertain the Application filed by the Republic of India. By not informing Mr. Jadhav without delay of his rights under Article 36, paragraph 1 (b), of the Vienna Convention, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan breached the obligations incumbent upon it under that provision. Further, Court observes that, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan deprived the Republic of India of the right to communicate with and have access to Mr. Jadhav, to visit him in detention and to arrange for his legal representation, and thereby breached the obligations incumbent upon it under Article 36, paragraph 1 (a) and (c), of the Vienna Convention. India and Pakistan have been parties to the Vienna Convention since 28th December, 1977 and 14th May, 1969, respectively. They also were, at the time of the filing of the Application, parties to the Optional Protocol without any reservations or declarations.

Since, 3rd March, 2016, an individual named, Kulbhushan Sudhir Jadhav who has been in the custody of Pakistani authorities. Mr. Jadhav was accused of performing acts of espionage and terrorism on behalf of India, and sentenced to death by a military Court in Pakistan in April, 2017. The Court thus concludes that the Convention is applicable in the present case, regardless of the allegations that Mr. Jadhav was engaged in espionage activities. Accordingly, the Court is of the view that, Pakistan is under an obligation to cease those acts and to comply fully with its obligations under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention.

Tags : DETENTION   INDIAN NATIONAL   OBLIGATION   BREACH  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved