SC: Suit Alleging Coercion or Undue Influence Cannot be Rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC  ||  Cal HC: Once ED Attachment is Confirmed, Challenge Becomes Academic; PMLA Remedy Must be Pursued  ||  MP HC: Pen-Drive Evidence Cannot be Introduced At a Late Trial Stage Without Proof or Relevance  ||  Calcutta HC: Employee Can't be Stopped From Joining Rival Post-Resignation; Trade Secrets Protected  ||  Calcutta HC: Banks Must Provide Forensic Audit Report Before Calling an Account Fraudulent  ||  Del HC: Woman Cannot Demand Re-Entry to Abandoned Matrimonial Home if Alternate Accommodation Exists  ||  Calcutta HC: Land Acquisition For Industrial Park is Public Purpose; Leasing to Industry is Valid  ||  Patna HC: PwD Recruitment Must Comply With RPwD Act; Executive Resolutions Cannot Override the Law  ||  Madras HC: Individuals Facing Criminal Trial Must Get Court Permission Even to Renew Passports  ||  Calcutta HC: Demolition Orders Cannot be Challenged under Article 226 if a Statutory Appeal Exists    

Madras High Court: Non Co-operation by Assessee Not Ground to Rationalize Assessment - (14 Jun 2019)

SERVICE TAX

Madras High Court has held that the revenue cannot take the defence of non-co-operation of the Assessee during the assessment period to justify the Assessment order. While granting relief to the Assessee, the Court observed that an assessment has to be framed in accordance with law and application of all relevant notifications/circulars/ clarifications issued by the Board/Government.

Tags : MADRAS HIGH COURT   ASSESSMENT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved