Allahabad HC: Employees of Constituent Institutions are not Entitled to Central University Benefits  ||  Calcutta High Court: Juvenile Accused Eligible to Apply for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 CrPC  ||  J&K & L HC: Departmental Proceedings Not Halted by Pending Criminal Case Without Showing Prejudice  ||  Cal HC: CESTAT Appeals Abate After Resolution Plan Success; CENVAT Reversal Requires No Pre-Deposit  ||  Bom HC: SEBI Settlement Doesn’t Protect Accused from Criminal Liability in Serious Economic Offences  ||  SC Directs States to Notify Eco-Sensitive Zones Around Tiger Reserves and Regulate Tiger Safaris  ||  SC: Its 2024 Order Letting Union Review Benami Act Cases Based on 'Ganpati Dealcom' was Incorrect  ||  SC: Rejection of Income Tax Settlement Application Doesn’t Bar Assessee from Contesting Assessment  ||  SC Informed Accessibility Facilities for Visually Impaired Candidates in AIBE and CLAT Expected Soon  ||  Supreme Court: Pendency of Writ Proceedings Does Not Bar Availing Alternative Statutory Remedies    

Smt. Sarojni Bhoi v. State of Chhattisgarh and ors. - (30 Nov 2015)

A little more compassion for married daughters

Service

It may not quite be the “but-for-sex”, but Chhattisgarh High Court’s ruling took a step in quelling another probably archaic, certainly egregious government policy. In a petition challenging State policy disentitling married women, but not married men, from being granted compassionate appointment in lieu of their deceased parent, the Court held such policy “plainly arbitrary and violative of constitutional guarantee…in Article 14, 15 and 16(2)”. Aside from basing itself on the constitutionally enshrined principles of not discriminating on the basis of gender, the Court tendered legal precedent that a woman remains a daughter even after marriage.

Compassionate appointment, manifesting from welfare considerations, is schemed to prevent families of government employees from falling into impoverishment upon death of a sole breadwinner. Over many years the policy has transformed from what was at inception an unfettered access into government service without regard for qualification, eligibility or, occasionally, actual financial need. Be it time taken to apply for compassionate appointment, financial means of the family and suitability for position, Courts have endeavoured to make compassionate appointments fairer not only for the government subjected to them, but also for those being granted benefit. A Rajasthan High Court decision, for instance, was faced with the dilemma whether a daughter-in-law could be granted compassionate appointment in the event of her husband and father-in-law’s death. It held that a ‘widowed daughter-in-law’, regardless of religion, could seek appointment under the definition of ‘widowed daughter’. However, Courts have been belaboured by inconsonant Central and State policies, particularly those that are insufficient to cover the vast array of peculiar circumstances that have arisen.

Relevant : Scheme for Compassionate Appointment

State of J and K and Ors. v. Sajad Ahmed Mir MANU/SC/3077/2006 Smt. Pinki v. State of Rajasthan and Ors. MANU/RH/0685/2011

Tags : COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT   MARRIED DAUGHTER   CHHATTISGARH  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved