NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC  ||  SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation  ||  SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job  ||  NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights  ||  NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation  ||  Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation  ||  Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices  ||  Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear    

The State of Bombay v. Narasu Appa Mali - (High Court of Bombay) (24 Jul 1951)

Personal laws not disturbed by fundamental rights

MANU/MH/0040/1952

Constitution

What could the Bombay High Court have said that stung Finance Minister Arun Jaitley so, leading him to call it “one of the most adverse judgments”. After all in 1951 the Bombay High Court, dissecting the Bombay Prevention of Hindu Bigamous Marriages Act, 1946, held that “even if the State Legislature has infringed upon Hindu religion or its practice as alleged, it would be perfectly competent for the State Legislature to do so, if it is legislating for social welfare and reform”. Subsequently upholding the aforementioned Act, it appears to have concreted positive social change in the shift away from bigamy to monogamous marriages in Hindus. Perhaps Mr Jaitley’s angst lies in personal laws being escaped from the ambit of Article 13 of the Constitution. Held to not form part of the “laws in force”, the decision allowed polygamy to subsist in other religions, possibly in contravention of Article 15.

Relevant : Article 13 of the Constitution of India Act Article 15 of the Constitution of India Act Article 25 of the Constitution of India Act

Tags : PERSONAL LAWS   BIGAMY   FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS   SOCIAL CUSTOM  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved