MP HC: Policy of First Come, First Serve is Inherently Flawed  ||  Bombay HC: Arbitration Clause Giving Unilateral Power Does Not Render the Agreement Invalid  ||  Madras HC: Taxpayer Not Responding to Notices Should be Sent Reminder through RPAD  ||  Madras HC: Taxpayer Not Responding to Notices Should be Sent Reminder through RPAD  ||  Bombay HC: There is Prohibition Only on "Talaq-e-biddat" and Not on "Talaq-e-Ahsan"  ||  Bombay HC: Government Allottee Lacking Legal Occupation Can’t be Considered ‘Deemed Tenant’  ||  AP HC: If a “Necessary Party” is Not Impleaded, the Suit Itself is Liable to be Dismissed  ||  Delhi HC: No Affect on Charitable Trust’s Status for Making Payments for Services by Related Party  ||  Bombay HC Directs State Govt. to Upload State's Prison & Police Manual on Internet  ||  Delhi HC: If Use of Smoke Cannister a Terrorist Act then Every Holi & IPL Match Will Attract UAPA    

COMPANY - SC: Companies Act Does Not Stipulate Any Fixed Period for Completion of Serious Fraud Investigation - (28 Mar 2019)

COMPANY

SC while holding that there is no stipulation of any fixed period for completion of a Serious Fraud investigation observed that stipulation in Section 212(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, in relation to the submission of the report, is not mandatory, but directory.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   SECTION 212(3) OF THE COMPANIES ACT   2013   SERIOUS FRAUD INVESTIGATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved