SC: Delhi HC Can Restrict Senior Advocate Designation to Its Own Retired Judges  ||  Supreme Court: ‘Himachal May Disappear’, Flags Environmental Crisis  ||  Delhi HC: Civil Courts Can Block Foreign Arbitration if it’s Oppressive  ||  Madras HC: No Political Symbols or Leader Photos in Welfare Ads  ||  Bombay HC: Fresh Corruption Trial Allowed After Valid Sanction  ||  Calcutta HC: Compromise Scheme Under Companies Act Overrides SARFAESI  ||  SC: Authority Imposing Minor Penalty Can Initiate Major Penalty Charges  ||  SC Slams HC for 2-Year Bail Delay, Calls for Sensitivity in Liberty Cases  ||  SC: Recalls Judgment in Bhushan Steel Case Citing Injustice Under Art. 142  ||  HP HC: No Detention Merely for Suspected Heroin in Blood    

COMPANY - Cheque Bounce Case Against Director: Must be Proved that Director responsible for Company's Conduct - (11 Mar 2019)

COMPANY

Supreme Court has reiterated that, a 'cheque bounce' complaint against a Company and its Director, must contain a specific averment that Director was in charge of, and responsible for, conduct of company's business at the time when offence U/S- 138/141 of Negotiable Instruments Act was committed.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   CHEQUE BOUNCE CASE AGAINST DIRECTOR  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved