Madras High Court Upholds Appointment of District Judges as Tamil Nadu Lokayukta Secretary  ||  Allahabad High Court: IO’s Mere Apprehension Cannot Justify Withholding Seized Items  ||  Patna High Court: Mere Sight of Spouse in Compromising Position doesn't Prove Adultery  ||  Sikkim High Court: POCSO Case not Quashed on Settlement after Survivor Turns Major  ||  Chhattisgarh High Court: Backward Classes Commission Cannot Decide Private Commercial Disputes  ||  SC: Futures & Options Investors Cannot Recover Trading Losses From Professional Clearing Members  ||  Supreme Court: NCTE Executive Committee Can Seek Annual Reports From Teacher Education Institutes  ||  SC: S.362 CrPC Cannot Limit HC’s Inherent Power to Recall Judgment Causing Miscarriage of Justice  ||  Supreme Court Upholds RBI’s Power to Supersede Multi-State Co-op Bank Boards Beyond Six Months  ||  Supreme Court: Retaining Victim in a Specific Role Cannot Reduce Functional Disability    

Veer Service Station and Ors. v. GNCT of Delhi and Ors. - (High Court of Delhi) (04 Aug 2015)

Levy of VAT on the sale price of transaction yet to take place not sustainable in law

MANU/DE/2196/2015

Civil

The Delhi High Court struck down Explanation 2 to Section 2 (1) (zd) of the Delhi Value Added Tax (Fourth Amendment) Act, 2012 as being ultra vires the Constitution. The Petitioners, the Delhi Petrol Dealers Association, had contended that under Explanation 2 VAT could be levied on the price charged for a sale which was yet to take place. The Court took note of a Supreme Court ruling that the "law prohibits taxing of a transaction which is not a completed sale".

Relevant : State of Rajasthan and Anr. vs. Rajasthan Chemists Association MANU/SC/3304/2006 Moriroku UT India (P) Ltd. vs. State of U.P. and Ors. MANU/SC/7350/2008 The Sales Tax Officer, Pilibhit vs. Budh Prakash Jai Prakash MANU/SC/0119/1954

Tags : VALUE ADDED TAX   DELHI   SALE   ULTRA VIRES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved