Supreme Court: Past Ad Hoc Service Counts for Pension, Not Seniority Against Direct Recruits  ||  SC: CPC Amendment Allowed When New Facts and Reliefs Directly Relate to Existing Dispute  ||  SC: Governing Law Clause Relevant to Determine Arbitral Seat When Two Venues Are Named  ||  Supreme Court: Section 161 CrPC Statements Can Be Considered at Cognizance Stage, Not at Trial  ||  Bombay High Court Directs Release of Protesters Held over Anti-ECI Agitations  ||  Kerala High Court Orders State to Pay Rs. 21,000 Post-Surgery Assistance to Transgender Person  ||  Madras High Court: DVAC Not Entitled to Blanket RTI Exemption in Corruption Cases  ||  Karnataka High Court Strikes Down Enhanced SC/ST Quota for Breaching 50% Reservation Cap  ||  Delhi HC: First-Come, First-Served Policy for Ramleela Ground Allotment is Unfair  ||  Kerala HC Upholds Automatic Revocation of Christian Wills on Marriage under S.69 Succession Act    

Tata Chemicals Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Ahmedabad - (Supreme Court) (06 Aug 2015)

Excluding value of packing material illegal in conditional return

MANU/SC/0841/2015

Excise

Not including the value of packing materials used to transport goods in the final sale price of goods is illegal, in the absence of an arrangement to return the same to the seller. The Court, upon perusing letters exchanged between the Assessee and the buyer, held that no arrangement existed between the two as the return of packing material by the buyer was conditional.

Relevant : Hindustan Polymers v. Collector of Central Excise MANU/SC/0298/1990 Mahalakshmi Glass Works (P) Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Bombay MANU/SC/0265/1988 Commissioner of Central Excise v. Hindustan National Glass and Industries Ltd. MANU/SC/0199/2005 K. Radha Krishnaiah v. Inspector of Central Excise MANU/SC/0301/1986

Tags : EXCISE   VALUE   PACKING MATERIAL  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved