Lok Sabha Passes the Disaster Management (Amendment) Bill, 2024  ||  NCLAT: Can’t Bar Petition u/s 7 of IBC for Default Committed Prior to S.10A Period  ||  NCLAT: Secured Creditor to Pay Liquidator's Fees Under Regulations if Option u/s 52 IBC Exercised  ||  Bom. HC: Authority Processing Duty Credit Scrip Application is the Adjudicating Authority for Appeals  ||  SC: Matters Exclusively Within Jurisdiction of Statutory Authorities are Not Arbitrable  ||  SC: Wife Not Filing Complaint of Cruelty for Years Doesn’t Mean There Was No Cruelty  ||  SC: Gift Deed Conditioned Upon Rendering of Services Without Remuneration is Unconstitutional  ||  SC: Can’t Invoke Preventive Detention against Every Alleged Breach of Peace  ||  SC: Mere Allegations of Harassment Not Enough to Hold Accused Guilty of Abetment of Suicide  ||  SC: No Registration of Further Suits against Places of Worship till Further Orders    

Bombay High Court upholds BCCI’s age determination test- (High Court of Bombay) (18 Nov 2015)

Civil

While public documents provide a right to vote, travel and open bank accounts, they may not be sufficient to permit playing cricket. A Division Bench of the Bombay High Court mallet-ed home the point “Chronological of birth through public documents cannot provide absolute right for selection in a sports activity”. It refused to interfere with the Board of Cricket Control rules that require a bone test for those aspiring to play in Under-16 (or other age restricted) tournaments.

In an earlier decision, the Delhi High Court had ruled that bone tests for age determination of players for all Under-16 tournaments were not arbitrary, unreasonable or discriminatory. It had noted that the tests, relied on as a method to avoid discrimination between players had been used for several years and the Petitioners in that case had acceded to the same. MANU/DE/3210/2015

Tags : CRICKET   AGE DETERMINATION   BONE   TEST  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved