Delhi HC: Maintenance is Intended to Safeguard Dependent Spouse & Child’s Right to Live With Dignity  ||  Delhi HC: Any Person in India Has the Right to Legally Import Goods from Abroad  ||  Bombay HC: Can’t Quash Rape Cases on the Basis of Compromise  ||  Madras HC: Can’t Tap Individual’s Phone to Uncover Suspected Crime  ||  Karnataka HC: Women Commuters Oppose Ban on Bike Taxis in Karnataka  ||  Delhi HC: Inclusive Education is About Recognising That Every Child Has a Place in Classroom  ||  Delhi HC: Patanjali to Not Run Ads that are Disparaging to Dabur Products  ||  Delhi HC Upholds Rule Restricting Retention of GPRA by Central Armed Police Forces  ||  Delhi HC: Disability Pension Ensures that a Soldier is Not Left Without Support  ||  SC Declines Petition by Lalit Modi against BCCI Seeking Indemnification    

Express Industry Council of India v. Jet Airways (India) Ltd. and Ors. - (Competition Commission of India) (17 Nov 2015)

CCI finds cartel in “intensely competitive” air cargo

MANU/CO/0099/2015

MRTP/ Competition Laws

The Competition Commission of India found Jet Airways, Indigo Airlines and SpiceJet Limited guilty of contravening competition guidelines. It noted that the airlines had overcharged for freighting cargo, colluding to artificially raise the Fuel Surcharge at a time when costs were reducing. In so doing, the Commission disagreed with the findings of the Director General of Civil Aviation, which had assessed the air cargo industry to be “intensely competitive”. It determined from the close proximity of the surcharge manipulations that “It is neither the requirement of law nor any other jurisprudence that cartels must originate symmetrically, progress symmetrically…colluding parties would like to break the patterns through artificial gaps and arrangements so as to create a facade of competitive behaviour.”

Relevant : Section 3 Competition Act, 2002 Act

Tags : COMPETITION   AIR CARGO   CARTEL   SURCHARGE   COLLUSION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved