Delhi HC Issues Notice on Contempt Plea filed by ANI Media Private Limited  ||  Rights of Mutation: Del. HC Initiates Suo Motu PIL Over Lack of Policies for Mutation of Property  ||  All. HC: Can’t Implicate Co-Accused u/s 149 when there is No Meeting of Mind Regarding Common Object  ||  SC: Factum of Causing Injury Not Relevant When Accused Roped in as Member of Unlawful Assembly  ||  Meghalaya Govt. to SC: Circular Issued Regarding Prohibition of 'Two Finger test' on Rape Survivors  ||  SC: No Minimum Sentence Prescribed for Conviction Under Section 304(A) and 338 of IPC  ||  Kar. HC: Offence Under Widlife Protection Act Shouldn’t be Kept Pending for Very Long  ||  Mad. HC: Courts Have Power to Grant Maintenance to Muslim Woman Who Has Filed for Divorce  ||  Bom. HC: Bail Granted to Man on Ground of Having No Intention to Disrupt Public Peace  ||  MP HC: Transferring Accused Merely Because ICC Proceedings are Pending is Unjustified    

The Indian Express and anr v. Chandra Prakash Shivhare - (High Court of Bombay) (23 Oct 2015)

Injunction granted against title phonetically similar to ‘Indian Express’

Intellectual Property Rights

The Bombay High Court accepted arguments that the Defendant’s use of the title ‘Indian Express’ in Devnagari script for its newspaper infringed the trade mark registered in favour of The Indian Express Limited. It noted that the longevity, widespread use and daily publication of the mark made it well known, particularly given the prevalence of the internet over which it made available its ‘epaper’. The Court granted injunction against use of the phrase ‘Indian Express’ by the Defendant for being phonetically, structurally and aurally similar to that of the popular news daily. It expressed bewilderment over the Defendant’s choice of name for the paper given the plethora of publications, and subsequent failure to explain his “unbidden epiphany” in choosing the same.

Tags : INDIAN EXPRESS   TITLE   TRADE MARK  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved