Chhattisgarh HC: Father Must Provide Maintenance and Marriage Expenses to Unmarried Adult Daughter  ||  Delhi HC Rules That ‘Hermès’ and the 3D Shape of its ‘Birkin’ Bag are Well-Known Trademarks in India  ||  Kerala HC: Arrest is Illegal if Accused isn’t Produced in 24 Hours and Rearrest From Prison is Barred  ||  Supreme Court: Treating Every Sour Relationship as Rape Undermines the Seriousness of the Offence  ||  Supreme Court: Section 7 IBC Application Cannot be Rejected for Curable Defects in Affidavit  ||  NCLT Kochi: Sec 7 Insolvency Cannot be Filed Against Guarantor Without First Enforcing the Guarantee  ||  Patna High Court: Mere Two-And-A-Half-Year Incarceration is Not Sufficient for Bail under UAPA  ||  Bombay HC: Insolvency Cannot be Used to Evade a Family Court’s Maintenance Order  ||  Kerala HC: Forklifts and Factory Cranes Are Motor Vehicles and Must be Registered under MV Act  ||  Guj HC: Edible Crude Palm Kernel Oil Qualifies for Duty Exemption; End-Use Condition not Applicable    

Application Under Order 2 Rule 2 CPC can’t be Considered by Court U/S 11 Arbitration Act: Delhi HC - (16 Nov 2018)

Delhi High Court has held that courts cannot consider the question of viability of a claim under Order 2 Rule 2 of Code of Civil Procedure, while hearing a petition under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   CPC   ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT   1996  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved