Delhi High Court Releases Draft Arbitration Rules, 2023  ||  Delhi HC: Incumbent Upon Prosecution to Establish that Victim's Age Was Less Than 18 Years  ||  Rajasthan HC: Can’t Label FIR as Frivolous if Case Diaries Establish Commission of Offence  ||  Kerala High Court Quashes Order Imposing Internship Fees on Foreign Medical Graduates  ||  J&K HC: Cannot Allow Writ Petition to be Withdrawn on Basis of Unjustified Ground  ||  Gauhati HC Allows Wife to Stay Separately Due to Assault by Husband for Complexion of Child  ||  Gauhati HC: If Arrestee Taken to Hospital, Magistrate Must Verify Condition through VC or Visit  ||  Madras HC: NHAI is Under Obligation to Maintain the Highways Properly and thereafter Collect Toll Fee  ||  Madras HC: Welfare Govt. Should Strive to Enforce Prohibition Rather than Establishing Liquor Shops  ||  Delhi HC: While Investigating NDPS Cases Efforts Should Be Made to Use Technological Means    

The New India Assurance Company Limited v. Sunil Parsharam Garud - (High Court of Bombay) (29 Oct 2015)

Surviving spouse entitled to compensation even if both were earning members

Insurance

In a case regarding compensation for the death of a woman in a motor vehicle accident, the Bombay High Court determined that though the surviving husband was earning at the time of the incident, it could not be said that there was no loss of dependency. Aside from the need of the day of a husband and wife supplementing each other’s income, it noted that living together conferred benefits on both of reduced joint living expenses. The Court held not only was the claimant entitled to compensation for dependency, the insurance company had erred in taking the age of the deceased and ought to have considered the husband’s age in computing compensation.

Tags : DEPENDENCY   COMPENSATION   EARNING SPOUSE   SAVINGS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved