NCLAT: Can’t Dismiss Restoration App. if Filed in 30 Days from Date of Dismissal of Original App.  ||  Delhi HC: Communication between Parties through Whatsapp Constitute Valid Agreement  ||  Delhi HC Seeks Response from Govt. Over Penalties on Petrol Pumps Supplying Fuel to Old Vehicles  ||  Centre Notifies "Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Rules, 2025"  ||  Del. HC: Can’t Reject TM Owner’s Claim Merely because Defendant Could have Sought Removal of Mark  ||  Bombay HC: Cannot Treat Sole Director of OPC, Parallelly with Separate Legal Entity  ||  Delhi HC: Can Apply 'Family of Marks' Concept to Injunct Specific Marks  ||  HP HC: Can’t Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree for Mere Irregularity  ||  Cal. HC: Order by HC Bench Not Conferred With Determination by Roster is Void  ||  Calcutta HC: Purchase Order Including Arbitration Agreement to Prevail Over Tax Invoice Lacking it    

Vijay Kumar Vs. Pankaj Sharma and Ors. - (High Court of Himachal Pradesh) (10 Oct 2018)

Waiver of imprisonment in lieu of payment of additional compensation is permissible, though under exceptional circumstances

MANU/HP/1472/2018

Limitation

In present matter, the original complainant instituted a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ('Act') against the Petitioner on the allegations that, the cheque of Rs. 22,000 handed over by the Petitioner to the complainant in order to discharge his liability had been dishonoured. The complaint was decided in favour of the complainant by the learned trial Magistrate and the Petitioner was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month and to pay a compensation of Rs. 33,000 to the complainant.

Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the learned trial Magistrate, though the Petitioner preferred an appeal before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, however, the same came to be dismissed vide judgment, constraining the Petitioner to file the instant revision petition.

Learned counsel for the parties jointly stated that, the matter has been compromised between the parties as the Petitioner has deposited the entire compensation amount of Rs. 33,000 in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate. Since, the Petitioner has already deposited not only the cheque amount of Rs. 22,000, but an additional amount of Rs. 11,000, totalling to Rs. 33,000 as compensation amount as directed by the learned trial Magistrate, therefore, the matter can be given quietus in terms of the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Priyanka Nagpal v. State (NCT of Delhi) and another and P. Ramadas v. State of Kerala and another, wherein it is clearly held that, waiver of imprisonment in lieu of payment of additional compensation is permissible, though under exceptional circumstances.

The impugned substantive sentence of simple imprisonment imposed in this case shall stand modified and substituted in lieu of the amount of compensation of Rs. 33,000 that stands already deposited in the trial Court. The trial Court is directed to release the entire compensation amount deposited in this case by the Petitioner directly to the bank accounts of Respondents No. 1(a) and 1(b), who are the legal representatives of original complainant, forthwith, as per procedure. The revision petition stands disposed off.

Relevant : Priyanka Nagpal v. State (NCT of Delhi) and another, MANU/SC/0051/2018: (2018) 3 SCC 249 and P. Ramadas v. State of Kerala and another, MANU/SC/0145/2018: (2018) 3 SCC 287

Tags : LIABILITY   DISCHARGE   SENTENCE   LEGALITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved