NCLAT: Consideration of Debt Restructuring by Lenders Doesn’t Bar Member from Initiating Proceedings  ||  Delhi High Court: In Matters of Medical Evaluation, Courts Should Exercise Restraint  ||  Delhi HC: Any Person in India Has Right to Legally Import Goods from Abroad and Sell the Same  ||  Delhi HC: Waiver to Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act to be Given Once Tribunal is Constituted  ||  Supreme Court Has Asked States to Regularise Existing Court Managers  ||  SC: Union & States to Create Special POSCO Courts on Top Priority  ||  SC Upholds Authority of CERC to Award Compensation for Delays  ||  SC: Arbitral Tribunal Has Discretion to Include in Sum Awarded, Interest at Rate as it Deems Reasonab  ||  SC: Cannot Use Article 142 to Frame Guidelines on Judicial Recusal  ||  SC: Satisfaction Recorder in One EP Won’t Affect Subsequent EPs for Future Breaches    

Prakash and ors v. Phulavati and ors. - (Supreme Court) (16 Oct 2015)

No retrospective relief for Hindu women in succession

Family

In a case where a daughter contested having only a share in the self-acquired property of her father, but not in the entire property, the Supreme Court held that she could not claim retrospective application of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, which would have put her on level pegging as a son. It determined that to avail benefit under the Amendment, her father should have been alive post its introduction for it to be the relevant law in force at the time of his death. The Court also deliberated gender discrimination, making several observations on bias against women by religious custom and in the workplace, inviting public interest litigation for the same.

Relevant : Ms. Vaishali Satish Ganorkar & Anr. v. Mr. Satish Keshaorao Ganorkar & Ors. MANU/MH/0090/2012 Gurupad Khandappa Magdum vs . Hirabai Khandappa Magdum and Ors . MANU/SC/0407/1978 Section 6 Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Act

Tags : HINDU SUCCESSION   RETROSPECTIVE   APPLICATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved