Delhi HC: Maintenance is Intended to Safeguard Dependent Spouse & Child’s Right to Live With Dignity  ||  Delhi HC: Any Person in India Has the Right to Legally Import Goods from Abroad  ||  Bombay HC: Can’t Quash Rape Cases on the Basis of Compromise  ||  Madras HC: Can’t Tap Individual’s Phone to Uncover Suspected Crime  ||  Karnataka HC: Women Commuters Oppose Ban on Bike Taxis in Karnataka  ||  Delhi HC: Inclusive Education is About Recognising That Every Child Has a Place in Classroom  ||  Delhi HC: Patanjali to Not Run Ads that are Disparaging to Dabur Products  ||  Delhi HC Upholds Rule Restricting Retention of GPRA by Central Armed Police Forces  ||  Delhi HC: Disability Pension Ensures that a Soldier is Not Left Without Support  ||  SC Declines Petition by Lalit Modi against BCCI Seeking Indemnification    

Prakash and ors v. Phulavati and ors. - (Supreme Court) (16 Oct 2015)

No retrospective relief for Hindu women in succession

Family

In a case where a daughter contested having only a share in the self-acquired property of her father, but not in the entire property, the Supreme Court held that she could not claim retrospective application of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, which would have put her on level pegging as a son. It determined that to avail benefit under the Amendment, her father should have been alive post its introduction for it to be the relevant law in force at the time of his death. The Court also deliberated gender discrimination, making several observations on bias against women by religious custom and in the workplace, inviting public interest litigation for the same.

Relevant : Ms. Vaishali Satish Ganorkar & Anr. v. Mr. Satish Keshaorao Ganorkar & Ors. MANU/MH/0090/2012 Gurupad Khandappa Magdum vs . Hirabai Khandappa Magdum and Ors . MANU/SC/0407/1978 Section 6 Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Act

Tags : HINDU SUCCESSION   RETROSPECTIVE   APPLICATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved