Manipur HC: State Establishments Must Record Transgender Person’s New Name & Gender in Documents  ||  Delhi HC: Failure to Frame Counter Claim Despite Pleadings is Patently Illegal  ||  Mumbai Commission Holds Reliance Retail Liable for Defective AC Replacement Failure  ||  SC Orders ASI to Supervise Repair of Mehrauli’s Ancient Dargahs  ||  SC Reprimands Bihar IPS Officer for Affidavit Supporting Murder Convict  ||  SC Rejects Review Plea on WB SSC Jobs, Upholds Quashing of 25k Appointments  ||  SC Rejects Review Plea on WB SSC Jobs, Upholds Quashing of 25k Appointments  ||  Supreme Court Orders Haridwar Collector Inquiry into Maa Chandi Devi Trust  ||  SC Recommends Statutory Appeal Against DJ’s Compensation Orders  ||  SC Dismisses Petition Challenging 2024 Maharashtra Assembly Elections Over Bogus Voting    

Prakash and ors v. Phulavati and ors. - (Supreme Court) (16 Oct 2015)

No retrospective relief for Hindu women in succession

Family

In a case where a daughter contested having only a share in the self-acquired property of her father, but not in the entire property, the Supreme Court held that she could not claim retrospective application of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, which would have put her on level pegging as a son. It determined that to avail benefit under the Amendment, her father should have been alive post its introduction for it to be the relevant law in force at the time of his death. The Court also deliberated gender discrimination, making several observations on bias against women by religious custom and in the workplace, inviting public interest litigation for the same.

Relevant : Ms. Vaishali Satish Ganorkar & Anr. v. Mr. Satish Keshaorao Ganorkar & Ors. MANU/MH/0090/2012 Gurupad Khandappa Magdum vs . Hirabai Khandappa Magdum and Ors . MANU/SC/0407/1978 Section 6 Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Act

Tags : HINDU SUCCESSION   RETROSPECTIVE   APPLICATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved