Calcutta HC: Demolition Orders Cannot be Challenged under Article 226 if a Statutory Appeal Exists || Kerala High Court: Disability Pension is Payable to Voluntary Dischargee For Service-Related Illness || Calcutta High Court: Partition Decree is Executable Only After Stamp Duty Payment || Calcutta HC: Contempt Court Cannot Grant New Relief Beyond Original Order Once Compliance is Met || Kerala High Court: Intentional Judicial Decisions Cannot be Altered as Clerical Errors under CPC || Supreme Court: Delay In Filing Appeals under Section 74 of 2013 Land Acquisition Act is Condonable || SC: Statutory Authorities may Intervene When Housing Societies Delay Membership Decisions || SC: Quasi-Judicial Authorities Cannot Exercise Review Powers Unless Expressly Granted By Statute || SC: Special Court Cannot Order Confiscation While Appeal Against Attachment Confirmation is Pending || SC: Photocopies are Not Evidence Unless Conditions for Leading Secondary Evidence are Proved

Jayaswal Neco Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Raipur - (Supreme Court) (06 Aug 2015)

Rule 173G payment from CENVAT Account

MANU/SC/0839/2015

Excise

The Supreme Court held in favour of an Assessee claiming payment from its CENVAT Account could be counted towards demand under Rule 173G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Court, affirming the position taken in a previous High Court judgment, added that since then the Central Excise Rules, 2002 themselves had been amended discontinuing this provision for payment. The Assessee's dispute had originated prior to the amendment.

Relevant : Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune v. Dai Ichi Karkaria Limited MANU/SC/0467/1999 Eicher Motors Ltd. v. Union of India MANU/SC/0051/1999

Tags : EXCISE CENVAT DUTY PAYMENT

Share :