Supreme Court: Registered Sale Deed Carries Strong Presumption of Genuineness || SC: Registry Cannot Intrude Into Judiciary’s Exclusive Domain By Questioning Why a Party is Impleaded || Calcutta HC: Third-Party Suits in a Deity’s Name are Allowed Only When The Sebait Loses Authority || Madras HC: Encroachment on a Public Street Cannot be Allowed Even If It Has a Religious Character || Karnataka HC: Bike Taxi Business Protected under Article 19(1)(G); State Can Regulate But Not Ban || Allahabad HC: Not Specifying Arrest Grounds in Memo is Dereliction; Erring Cops Must be Suspended || Del. HC Stresses Mandatory Legal Assistance to Preserve Fairness and Integrity of Criminal Trials || Supreme Court: Delhi High Court Ruling upheld on Taekwondo National Sports Federation Recognition || SC: Blockchain-Based Digitisation of Land Records Necessary to Reduce Property Document Litigation || Supreme Court to NCLT : Limit Power to Decide Intellectual Property Title Disputes under IBC

Jayaswal Neco Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Raipur - (Supreme Court) (06 Aug 2015)

Rule 173G payment from CENVAT Account

MANU/SC/0839/2015

Excise

The Supreme Court held in favour of an Assessee claiming payment from its CENVAT Account could be counted towards demand under Rule 173G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Court, affirming the position taken in a previous High Court judgment, added that since then the Central Excise Rules, 2002 themselves had been amended discontinuing this provision for payment. The Assessee's dispute had originated prior to the amendment.

Relevant : Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune v. Dai Ichi Karkaria Limited MANU/SC/0467/1999 Eicher Motors Ltd. v. Union of India MANU/SC/0051/1999

Tags : EXCISE CENVAT DUTY PAYMENT

Share :