Supreme Court: Wait-Listed Candidates Have No Vested Right After List Expiry || SC: Reserved Candidates Scoring Above General Cut-Off Must be Considered For Open Posts || SC: AICTE Regulations Do Not Govern Direct Recruitment of Engineering Professors by State PSCs || Supreme Court: High Courts To Decide Article 226(3) Applications Within Two Weeks || SC: State Agencies are Competent To Probe Corruption Cases Against Central Government Officers || Allahabad High Court: Wife May Claim Education Expenses; Adverse Inference If Husband Hides Income || Patna High Court: Cruelty Claims Against In-Laws are Unlikely Without Shared Residence or Interaction || Patna HC: Aadhaar and GPS-Based Attendance For Medical College Faculty Does Not Violate Privacy || Allahabad HC: Victim Compensation under POCSO Act Cannot be Withheld For Lack of Injury Report || MP HC: Diverting Goods From Delivery Point is Misappropriation under S.407 IPC

Jayaswal Neco Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Raipur - (Supreme Court) (06 Aug 2015)

Rule 173G payment from CENVAT Account

MANU/SC/0839/2015

Excise

The Supreme Court held in favour of an Assessee claiming payment from its CENVAT Account could be counted towards demand under Rule 173G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Court, affirming the position taken in a previous High Court judgment, added that since then the Central Excise Rules, 2002 themselves had been amended discontinuing this provision for payment. The Assessee's dispute had originated prior to the amendment.

Relevant : Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune v. Dai Ichi Karkaria Limited MANU/SC/0467/1999 Eicher Motors Ltd. v. Union of India MANU/SC/0051/1999

Tags : EXCISE CENVAT DUTY PAYMENT

Share :