Supreme Court: GPF Nomination in Favour of a Parent Becomes Invalid Once the Employee Marries  ||  Supreme Court: Candidate Not Disqualified if Core Subject Studied Without Exact Degree Title  ||  Supreme Court: Stamp Duty Relief for Co-Operative Societies Cannot Depend on Extra-Legal Verification  ||  Delhi High Court: Allegations of Forgery Alone Do not Bar NCLT From Examining Company Records  ||  J&K&L HC: Only Revenue Authorities Can Handle Agrarian Resumption; Civil Courts Cannot Intervene  ||  Delhi HC: CAPF Candidate's Height of 164.6 Cm Can be Rounded to 165 Cm; Rejection Prima Facie Illegal  ||  NCLT Mumbai: Bank Cannot Retain OTS Earnest Money After Accepting a Resolution Plan  ||  Supreme Court: Imminent Death Not Required For a Statement to Qualify as Dying Declaration  ||  SC: HC Cannot Grant Pre-Arrest Bail Without Quashing FIR; Accused Must Approach Sessions Court First  ||  SC: Agreed Interest Rate Cannot Be Challenged as Exorbitant; Arbitrator Cannot Override Contract    

Supreme Court strikes down Section 377 of IPC as unconstitutional - (06 Sep 2018)

Constitution

In a historic verdict, Supreme Court strikes down Section 377 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) as unconstitutional. Supreme Court, while decriminalizing gay sex in India recognized the fundamental rights of homosexuals. CJI Dipak Mishra said that, Section 377 of IPC is irrational, arbitrary and incomprehensible as it violates right to equality of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender (LGBT) community. The right to privacy has now been recognised to be an intrinsic part of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 of Constitution.

However, in the year 2013, the Supreme Court while setting aside Delhi High Court’s landmark verdict on homosexuality, decriminalising sexual relation between persons belonging to the same sex, upheld the constitutional validity of Section 377 of IPC that makes gay sex as punishable offence. In 2016, Supreme Court, while leaving the door open for a review of colonial-era ban on gay sex in India, agreed to hear LGBT matter and referred it to 5 judge bench.

In the landmark judgment, Supreme Court held that, Section 377 affects the private sphere of the lives of LGBT persons. It takes away the decisional autonomy of LGBT persons to make choices consistent with their sexual orientation, which would further a dignified existence and a meaningful life as a full person. Members of the LGBT community are entitled to the benefit of an equal citizenship, without discrimination, and to the equal protection of law.

Justice Indu Malhotra observed that, Section 377 as it criminalises consensual sexual acts of adults who are competent to consent) in private, is violative of Articles 14, 15, 19, and 21 of the Constitution. However, such consent must be free consent, which is completely voluntary in nature, and devoid of any duress or coercion. The judgment in Suresh K. Koushal & Anr. v. Naz Foundation & Ors. is overruled.

Tags : LGBT COMMUNITY   EQUAL RIGHTS   GRANT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved