SC: ‘Abandonment of Service is Not Voluntary Retirement’, Denying SBI Clerk Pension Benefits  ||  Supreme Court: Stranger Affected by an Interim Order is Entitled to be Impleaded in Writ Proceedings  ||  Supreme Court: Courts Cannot Replace an Authority’s Discretion, and Sets Aside Direction to Governor  ||  SC: Title Suit Hit by Constructive Res Judicata if Omitted in Prior Injunction Suit Disputing Title  ||  SC Clarifies Whether a Co-Operative Society Can Act as a Resolution Applicant under the IBC  ||  Chhattisgarh High Court: Innocent Litigants Should Not be Penalized For Lapses by Their Lawyers  ||  Delhi High Court: Marriage With the Victim Cannot Absolve an Accused of Rape under POCSO  ||  J&K&L HC: Acquisition Lapses if 80% Compensation is Unpaid Before Possession under Section 17A  ||  Delhi HC: Policy Number is Not Mandatory For LIC Details under RTI, But Basic Details are Required  ||  SC: Courts Must Curb Unlicensed Money Lenders; Probes Need Not Wait For New Law    

British India General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Captain Itbar Singh and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 May 1959)

Insurers cannot be excluded from proceedings on non-statutory grounds

MANU/SC/0148/1959

Motor Vehicles

In 1959 the Supreme Court answered the question – can a motor vehicle insurer escape being arrayed as a defendant on grounds not mentioned in statute – in the negative. Noting the inability of an insurer to not recover anything from the assured as “bad luck”, the Court was curt in its deliberations. “the loss had to fall on some one and the statute has thought fit that it shall be borne by the insurer”. It refused to read into Section 96 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 additional exceptions that would allow an insurer to escape responsibility. Perhaps more notable was the tort-esque reasoning of the court about the loss befalling one who had no hand in causing it.

Note: The laws are old, dark and potholed; drive with your headlights on.

Relevant : Sarupsing Mangatsing vs. Nilkant Bhaskar MANU/MH/0079/1953 Royal Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Abdul Mahomed Meheralli MANU/MH/0068/1955

Tags : MOTOR VEHICLES ACT   1939   INSURER   EXCLUSION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved