Supreme Court: Vacancies From Resignations under CUSAT Act Must Follow Communal Rotation  ||  Supreme Court: Forest Land Cannot Be Leased or Used For Agriculture Without Centre’s Approval  ||  Supreme Court: Gravity of Offence and Accused’s Role Must Guide Suspension of Sentence under CrPC  ||  Supreme Court: Arbitral Awards Cannot be Set Aside For Mere Legal Errors or Misreading of Evidence  ||  SC Acknowledges Child Trafficking as a Grave Reality and Issues Guidelines to Assess Victim Evidence  ||  Allahabad HC: When Parties Extend an Agreement by Conduct, The Arbitration Clause Extends Too  ||  Supreme Court: Issues of Party Capacity and Maintainability Must Be Decided by Arbitral Tribunal  ||  Supreme Court: Omissions in Chief Examination Can Be Rectified During Cross-Examination  ||  Supreme Court: Items Given by Accused to Police Are Not Section 27 Recoveries under Evidence Act  ||  Gujarat High Court: Waqf Institutions Must Pay Court Fees When Filing Disputes in State Tribunal    

British India General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Captain Itbar Singh and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (11 May 1959)

Insurers cannot be excluded from proceedings on non-statutory grounds

MANU/SC/0148/1959

Motor Vehicles

In 1959 the Supreme Court answered the question – can a motor vehicle insurer escape being arrayed as a defendant on grounds not mentioned in statute – in the negative. Noting the inability of an insurer to not recover anything from the assured as “bad luck”, the Court was curt in its deliberations. “the loss had to fall on some one and the statute has thought fit that it shall be borne by the insurer”. It refused to read into Section 96 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 additional exceptions that would allow an insurer to escape responsibility. Perhaps more notable was the tort-esque reasoning of the court about the loss befalling one who had no hand in causing it.

Note: The laws are old, dark and potholed; drive with your headlights on.

Relevant : Sarupsing Mangatsing vs. Nilkant Bhaskar MANU/MH/0079/1953 Royal Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Abdul Mahomed Meheralli MANU/MH/0068/1955

Tags : MOTOR VEHICLES ACT   1939   INSURER   EXCLUSION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved