Supreme Court: Companies Can Face Prosecution Without Individual Officers Being Named || SC: Penalties on Insolvent Developers cannot be Recovered from Homebuyers as CIRP Costs || Allahabad HC: ‘Sar Tan Se Juda’ Hits Sovereignty, Unlike ‘Allahu-Akbar’, ‘Jai Shri Ram’ || Kerala High Court: Married Woman Cannot Claim Sex Was Based Solely on Promise of Marriage || Madras High Court Refuses Equal Recitation of Tamil Hymns With Sanskrit at Meenakshi Temple || Delhi HC: Absence of ‘Penetration’ In Child Victim’s Testimony Not Enough to Acquit Rape Accused || J&K High Court: Possession of Allegedly Anti-National Book Cannot Justify Preventive Detention || Delhi High Court: DNA Evidence Proves Sexual Intercourse, Not Consent || Madras High Court Upholds Appointment of District Judges as Tamil Nadu Lokayukta Secretary || Allahabad High Court: IO’s Mere Apprehension Cannot Justify Withholding Seized Items

Applicability of provisions of Sec 45 of Insurance Act 1938 in various scenarios - (Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority) (28 Oct 2015)

IRDA clarifies provisions for refund of premium on repudiation of policy

MANU/IRDA/0041/2015

Insurance

The Insurance Regulatory Development Authority of India has released clarifications pursuant to amendment of Section 45 of the Insurance Act, 1938. The clarifications relate to late claim on behalf of deceased policyholder, misrepresentation or suppression of material fact at time of obtaining policy and the quantum of refund in case of repudiation of policy.

Tags : INSURANCE CLARIFICATIONS SECTION 45 REFUND MISREPRESENTATION

Share :