SC: Clarificatory Statement Does Not Constitute a Binding Undertaking for Contempt Proceedings || Supreme Court: Litigant Cannot be Worse Off for Filing an Appeal under ‘No Reformatio in Peius’ || Orissa HC: Article 22(1) Arrest Rights Pre-Exist, Written Grounds Ruling Not Prospective || Kerala HC: Kissing a Child’s Penis Constitutes Penetrative Sexual Assault under POCSO || Madras HC: Married Daughter Cannot be Denied Compassionate Appointment Solely for Her Marriage || Bombay High Court: Child Welfare Prevails as ‘Joint Parenting’ is Not Recognised in Indian Law || Kerala HC: Minor’s Consent or Relationship with Accused Holds No Relevance under POCSO Act || Bombay HC: Failure to Prove Exact Quantum of Loss Does Not Bar Compensation || CCPA Fines Dial4Trade Rs. 10 Lakh for Online Ammonium Nitrate Listing Featuring Blast Images || Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order

Applicability of provisions of Sec 45 of Insurance Act 1938 in various scenarios - (Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority) (28 Oct 2015)

IRDA clarifies provisions for refund of premium on repudiation of policy

MANU/IRDA/0041/2015

Insurance

The Insurance Regulatory Development Authority of India has released clarifications pursuant to amendment of Section 45 of the Insurance Act, 1938. The clarifications relate to late claim on behalf of deceased policyholder, misrepresentation or suppression of material fact at time of obtaining policy and the quantum of refund in case of repudiation of policy.

Tags : INSURANCE CLARIFICATIONS SECTION 45 REFUND MISREPRESENTATION

Share :