Supreme Court: States Have the Power to Regulate Industrial Alcohol || Ker. HC: If a Legislation Confers Benefit on Some Persons it Can be Applied Retrospectively || All. HC: When Warrant of Arrest is Issued, Applicant Not Entitled to Invoke Extraordinary Power || Del. HC: Non-Signatory's Action Aligning With Signatories Impresses that it’s a Veritable Party || SC: Order Passed Under Public Premises Act Doesn’t Bar Invocation of Arbitration Clause || SC Reserves Judgement on Striking Down UP Madarsa Education Act, 2004 || Supreme Court: HDFC Bank is a Juristic Person, Question of Mens Rea Does Not Arise || Mad. HC: Family Court should Ensure Conducting Proceedings Without Insisting Presence of Parties || Delhi High Court: Court Can Waive of Requirement to Furnish Surety, if Satisfied || Del. HC: Standard Required to be Met by Post Award S.9 Relief is Higher than Pre-Award S.9 Relief

Applicability of provisions of Sec 45 of Insurance Act 1938 in various scenarios - (Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority) (28 Oct 2015)

IRDA clarifies provisions for refund of premium on repudiation of policy

MANU/IRDA/0041/2015

Insurance

The Insurance Regulatory Development Authority of India has released clarifications pursuant to amendment of Section 45 of the Insurance Act, 1938. The clarifications relate to late claim on behalf of deceased policyholder, misrepresentation or suppression of material fact at time of obtaining policy and the quantum of refund in case of repudiation of policy.

Tags : INSURANCE CLARIFICATIONS SECTION 45 REFUND MISREPRESENTATION

Share :