CCPA Fines Chaayos Rs.50,000 for Default Inclusion of Service Charge in Bills || MP HC: Major Unmarried Daughter Need Not Prove Disability to Claim Maintenance if Unable to Earn || Madras HC: Travel Costs Must be Reimbursed to Independent Special Public Prosecutors || MP HC: Timely Coordination Between Police, Banks and Telecom Bodies is Crucial in Cyber Fraud || Kerala HC: Foreign Counsel Cannot Conduct Cross-Examination Before Commissioners || Allahabad HC: Proclaimed Offenders Get Anticipatory Bail Only in Rare and Exceptional Cases || Madras HC: Repeated Intimacy Alone Doesn't Prove Consent; Coercion & Deception Must be Examined || SC: Government Can Revise Royalty under the MMDR Act Despite a Silent Lease Deed || SC: Recovery of a Weapon Alone is Insufficient to Prove Guilt Without Conscious Possession || SC: Section 68 of Evidence Act Does Not Require Attesting Witnesses to Prove Registered Sale Deeds

Applicability of provisions of Sec 45 of Insurance Act 1938 in various scenarios - (Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority) (28 Oct 2015)

IRDA clarifies provisions for refund of premium on repudiation of policy

MANU/IRDA/0041/2015

Insurance

The Insurance Regulatory Development Authority of India has released clarifications pursuant to amendment of Section 45 of the Insurance Act, 1938. The clarifications relate to late claim on behalf of deceased policyholder, misrepresentation or suppression of material fact at time of obtaining policy and the quantum of refund in case of repudiation of policy.

Tags : INSURANCE CLARIFICATIONS SECTION 45 REFUND MISREPRESENTATION

Share :