SC: POCSO Guilt Presumption Not Absolute, Acquits Accused || Supreme Court: Promotion Cannot Be Claimed as a Vested Right under Repealed Rules || Supreme Court: Promotion Cannot Be Claimed as a Vested Right under Repealed Rules || SC: Unexplained 5-Day Sample Custody Gap Breached S.52A, Acquits 2 after 20 Years || P&H High Court: Illegal Search Alone Does Not Justify Quashing of Complaint under PNDT Act || Bom HC: Creating WhatsApp Group Without Employer's Permission Not Ground for Compulsory Retirement || Madras HC: Lack of Son’s Moral Support Alone Cannot Sustain Father’s Maintenance Claim under CrPC || Kerala HC: University Professor doesn't Occupy 'Public Office', Quo Warranto Not Maintainable || Bombay HC Allows Cutting of 1,237 Mangroves for Connector Bridge in Mumbai’s Western Suburbs || Calcutta HC Orders Return of 3-Year-Old to Adoptive Couple, he wasn't Abandoned

Applicability of provisions of Sec 45 of Insurance Act 1938 in various scenarios - (Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority) (28 Oct 2015)

IRDA clarifies provisions for refund of premium on repudiation of policy

MANU/IRDA/0041/2015

Insurance

The Insurance Regulatory Development Authority of India has released clarifications pursuant to amendment of Section 45 of the Insurance Act, 1938. The clarifications relate to late claim on behalf of deceased policyholder, misrepresentation or suppression of material fact at time of obtaining policy and the quantum of refund in case of repudiation of policy.

Tags : INSURANCE CLARIFICATIONS SECTION 45 REFUND MISREPRESENTATION

Share :