Calcutta HC: Cannot Deny Electricity Solely on Ground of Not Furnishing Ownership || Madras HC: Cannot Hold Protests at Whim and Fancies || Bombay HC: March of Development in Mumbai Cannot Trample Heritage Structures || P&H HC: Seriousness of Offence of Drug Trafficking Can’t Trample Constitutional Safeguards || Bombay HC: Cannot Deny ‘Right to Life’ to Accused who is in Custody || Ker HC: Action Must be Taken against Private Nursing Colleges Not Paying Teachers as per Regulations || Kerala HC: Can Make IRCTC Responsible for Managing Waste in Railway Stations || J&K HC: Magistrate Can Revoke Orders or Drop Proceedings if No Case is Made Out || Kerala HC Directs Placing of Draft Guidelines for Dealing With Snake Bites in Schools || J&K HC: Cannot Equate Irregular Appointments with Illegal Appointments

Applicability of provisions of Sec 45 of Insurance Act 1938 in various scenarios - (Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority) (28 Oct 2015)

IRDA clarifies provisions for refund of premium on repudiation of policy

MANU/IRDA/0041/2015

Insurance

The Insurance Regulatory Development Authority of India has released clarifications pursuant to amendment of Section 45 of the Insurance Act, 1938. The clarifications relate to late claim on behalf of deceased policyholder, misrepresentation or suppression of material fact at time of obtaining policy and the quantum of refund in case of repudiation of policy.

Tags : INSURANCE CLARIFICATIONS SECTION 45 REFUND MISREPRESENTATION

Share :