Supreme Court Rebukes RBI for Remaining a Bystander as YES Bank Operated Clandestinely || Supreme Court: Lower Fresh Bids Alone Cannot Justify Cancellation of an Auction || Supreme Court Directs Delhi Police to Produce Section 163 BNSS Orders and Preserve CCTV Footage || Supreme Court Affirms Menstrual Hygiene as a Fundamental Right, Warns States of Contempt || Supreme Court Flags AI-Generated Fake Judgments Submitted in a Party’s Case Compilation || Karnataka High Court: Vijay Mallya’s Flamboyant Lifestyle Hinders Settlement of Bank Claims || Delhi High Court: Women can be Booked for Gang Rape without Physically Committing it || Delhi High Court: Litigants Must Track Their Cases and Cannot Blame Lawyers for Their Own Inaction || Allahabad High Court: Contract Workers Must Prove Work Parity With Regular Staff for Equal Pay || Allahabad High Court Directs UP Trial Courts to Decide Maintenance Execution Cases Within Six Months

Applicability of provisions of Sec 45 of Insurance Act 1938 in various scenarios - (Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority) (28 Oct 2015)

IRDA clarifies provisions for refund of premium on repudiation of policy

MANU/IRDA/0041/2015

Insurance

The Insurance Regulatory Development Authority of India has released clarifications pursuant to amendment of Section 45 of the Insurance Act, 1938. The clarifications relate to late claim on behalf of deceased policyholder, misrepresentation or suppression of material fact at time of obtaining policy and the quantum of refund in case of repudiation of policy.

Tags : INSURANCE CLARIFICATIONS SECTION 45 REFUND MISREPRESENTATION

Share :