Supreme Court: Anti-Suit Injunction Cannot Rest on Speculation of Unenforceable Foreign Decree || SC: High Court’s Location doesn't Become Arbitration Seat Merely by Appointing Arbitrator || SC Disapproves PIL Challenging Inter-Se Evaluation of Tender Bids || Delhi HC: Bail Grant or Cancellation Cannot Depend on Monetary Settlement With Complainant || Kerala HC Directs Bar Council to Publish List of Advocates Practising Without AIBE Clearance, CoP || Rajasthan HC: Candidate Cannot Blame E-Mitra for Failing to Correct Caste Category Within Deadline || Patna HC: Mere FIR Registration cannot Justify Cancellation of PDS Licence || Calcutta HC: NEET Medical Board Cannot Reassess Disability Percentage of PwBD Candidates || Madras HC: MLAs Cannot Challenge Assembly Vote Later if They Raised No Objection During Voting || Karnataka HC Upholds DRDO Land Acquisition, Citing Primacy of National Security

Applicability of provisions of Sec 45 of Insurance Act 1938 in various scenarios - (Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority) (28 Oct 2015)

IRDA clarifies provisions for refund of premium on repudiation of policy

MANU/IRDA/0041/2015

Insurance

The Insurance Regulatory Development Authority of India has released clarifications pursuant to amendment of Section 45 of the Insurance Act, 1938. The clarifications relate to late claim on behalf of deceased policyholder, misrepresentation or suppression of material fact at time of obtaining policy and the quantum of refund in case of repudiation of policy.

Tags : INSURANCE CLARIFICATIONS SECTION 45 REFUND MISREPRESENTATION

Share :