SC: ‘Abandonment of Service is Not Voluntary Retirement’, Denying SBI Clerk Pension Benefits  ||  Supreme Court: Stranger Affected by an Interim Order is Entitled to be Impleaded in Writ Proceedings  ||  Supreme Court: Courts Cannot Replace an Authority’s Discretion, and Sets Aside Direction to Governor  ||  SC: Title Suit Hit by Constructive Res Judicata if Omitted in Prior Injunction Suit Disputing Title  ||  SC Clarifies Whether a Co-Operative Society Can Act as a Resolution Applicant under the IBC  ||  Chhattisgarh High Court: Innocent Litigants Should Not be Penalized For Lapses by Their Lawyers  ||  Delhi High Court: Marriage With the Victim Cannot Absolve an Accused of Rape under POCSO  ||  J&K&L HC: Acquisition Lapses if 80% Compensation is Unpaid Before Possession under Section 17A  ||  Delhi HC: Policy Number is Not Mandatory For LIC Details under RTI, But Basic Details are Required  ||  SC: Courts Must Curb Unlicensed Money Lenders; Probes Need Not Wait For New Law    

Authors Guild v Google, Inc - (16 Oct 2015)

Google wins lawsuit against scanning of copyrighted works

Intellectual Property Rights

A United States Court of Appeal ruled in favour of Google in a lawsuit concerning its book scanning activities. It determined that such digitisation of books, housed under the ‘Google Books’ database, did not constitute an infringement of copyright law as the company was not displaying, advertising or commercially profiting from the exercise. Instead, the endeavour could provide valuable data if previously inaccessible data could be made available to analytics and data mining software, brining it under the umbrella of ‘fair use’. Mindful that having digital versions of physical books that were previously kept on library shelves could encourage infringing practices or leave them vulnerable to hacking, the Court dismissed concerns as “nothing more than a speculative possibility”.

Tags : GOOGLE   COPYRIGHT   BOOKS   SCAN   FAIR USE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved