Del. HC: Denying Seat to Candidate Due to Administrative Fault Would be Unjust  ||  All. HC: Not Mandatory for Passport Authority to Impound Passport of Accused Persons  ||  Raj. HC: In Absence of Statutory Rules, Denying Appt. on Basis of Minimum Height is Discriminatory  ||  MP HC: Party Required to Lay Factual Foundation for Getting Benefit of Section 65 of Evidence Act  ||  Ker. HC: Settlement of Cases Including Offence of Rape & POCSO Act Offences is Not Permissible  ||  Gujarat High Court: Wife Allowed to Become Guardian & Manager of Husband in Coma  ||  SC: Partition of Property Can’t be Done by Metes & Bounds in Chandigarh  ||  SC Approves Requirement for Judicial Officers to be Converse With Local Language  ||  Kerala High Court: Denial of Ordinary Leave Reduces Convict’s Chances of Rehabilitation  ||  Delhi HC Issues Circular Regarding Pass-Overs or Adjournments in Bail, Parole Matters    

Authors Guild v Google, Inc - (16 Oct 2015)

Google wins lawsuit against scanning of copyrighted works

Intellectual Property Rights

A United States Court of Appeal ruled in favour of Google in a lawsuit concerning its book scanning activities. It determined that such digitisation of books, housed under the ‘Google Books’ database, did not constitute an infringement of copyright law as the company was not displaying, advertising or commercially profiting from the exercise. Instead, the endeavour could provide valuable data if previously inaccessible data could be made available to analytics and data mining software, brining it under the umbrella of ‘fair use’. Mindful that having digital versions of physical books that were previously kept on library shelves could encourage infringing practices or leave them vulnerable to hacking, the Court dismissed concerns as “nothing more than a speculative possibility”.

Tags : GOOGLE   COPYRIGHT   BOOKS   SCAN   FAIR USE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved