IT Rules Amendment 2023: Bombay High Court Strikes Down Amendment on Fact Check Units  ||  IT Rules Amendment 2023: Bombay High Court Strikes Down Amendment on Fact Check Units  ||  Raj. HC: MACT Empowered to Recall Order if Obtained through Fraud or Misrepresentation  ||  MP HC: While Hearing Bail Plea of Juvenile, Gravity of Offence Shouldn’t be Considered  ||  Orissa HC: Permanent Committee Can’t Withhold Candidature Without Submitting Names to Full Court  ||  Bom. HC: Person Working as Waiter Where Women are Dancing Cannot be Booked for Obscenity  ||  SC Allows Candidate with 45% Speech & Language Disability to Pursue Medical Education  ||  SC: In Acquittal Appeal, HC to Record Clear Finding While Reversing Judgement  ||  SC: Cannot Attach Contributory Negligence of Driver Vicariously to Passengers  ||  SC: Literal Construction to Be Considered if Language of Instrument/Document Is Clear & Unambiguous    

Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation v. Apple Inc. - (16 Oct 2015)

Apple loses patent battle for mobile processors but pays less than expected

Intellectual Property Rights

A jury in Wisconsin has found Apple guilty of infringing patents owned by Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, or WARF. It awarded WARF $234 million in damages, which is probably less than was expected. At an earlier preliminary motion by Apple to strike out expert testimonies, a precursor to its trial strategy of proving the patent invalid, the judge had noted that Apple faced “prejudice…magnitudes greater than Microsoft” by a jury being swayed by enormous its revenue stream, despite the infringing part constituting only a fraction of the value. In Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., the jury had, after hearing submissions on Microsoft’s $19 billion revenues, awarded damages amounting to $388 million – ultimately leading to fresh trial for excessive damages.

WARF, the patent management organisation for the University of Wisconsin – Madison, had alleged that Apple had made unlicensed use of its patent in the architecture of processors, significantly improving their efficiency and performance. The infringing processors have been used in several versions of iPhones and iPads. Its complaint against Apple can be READ HERE, while Apple’s preliminary motion before commencement of trial can be ACCESSED HERE.

Tags : APPLE   PATENT   LOSE   WARF   PROCESSOR   IPHONE   IPAD   MILLION   DAMAGES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved